Caroline Heimhofer, Marc Bächinger, Rea Lehner, Stefan Frässle, Joshua Henk Balsters, Nicole Wenderoth
{"title":"动态因果建模强调了感觉运动皮层自我抑制能力下降对运动性疲劳的重要性。","authors":"Caroline Heimhofer, Marc Bächinger, Rea Lehner, Stefan Frässle, Joshua Henk Balsters, Nicole Wenderoth","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02840-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Motor fatigability emerges when challenging motor tasks must be maintained over an extended period of time. It is frequently observed in everyday life and affects patients as well as healthy individuals. Motor fatigability can be measured using simple tasks like finger tapping at maximum speed for 30 s. This typically results in a rapid decrease of tapping frequency, a phenomenon called motor slowing. In a previous study (Bächinger et al, eLife, 8 (September), https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46750 , 2019), we showed that motor slowing goes hand in hand with a gradual increase in blood oxygen level dependent signal in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). It is unclear what drives the activity increase in SM1 caused by motor slowing and whether motor fatigability affects the dynamic interactions between SM1, SMA, and PMd. Here, we performed dynamic causal modelling (DCM) on data of 24 healthy young participants collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging to answer this question. The regions of interest (ROI) were defined based on the peak activation within SM1, SMA, and PMd. The model space consisted of bilateral connections between all ROI, with intrinsic self-modulation as inhibitory, and driving inputs set to premotor areas. Our findings revealed that motor slowing was associated with a significant reduction in SM1 self-inhibition, as uncovered by testing the maximum à posteriori against 0 (t(23)=-4.51, p < 0.001). Additionally, the model revealed a significant decrease in the driving input to premotor areas (t(23) > 2.71, p < 0.05) suggesting that structures other than cortical motor areas may contribute to motor fatigability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic causal modelling highlights the importance of decreased self-inhibition of the sensorimotor cortex in motor fatigability.\",\"authors\":\"Caroline Heimhofer, Marc Bächinger, Rea Lehner, Stefan Frässle, Joshua Henk Balsters, Nicole Wenderoth\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00429-024-02840-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Motor fatigability emerges when challenging motor tasks must be maintained over an extended period of time. It is frequently observed in everyday life and affects patients as well as healthy individuals. Motor fatigability can be measured using simple tasks like finger tapping at maximum speed for 30 s. This typically results in a rapid decrease of tapping frequency, a phenomenon called motor slowing. In a previous study (Bächinger et al, eLife, 8 (September), https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46750 , 2019), we showed that motor slowing goes hand in hand with a gradual increase in blood oxygen level dependent signal in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). It is unclear what drives the activity increase in SM1 caused by motor slowing and whether motor fatigability affects the dynamic interactions between SM1, SMA, and PMd. Here, we performed dynamic causal modelling (DCM) on data of 24 healthy young participants collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging to answer this question. The regions of interest (ROI) were defined based on the peak activation within SM1, SMA, and PMd. The model space consisted of bilateral connections between all ROI, with intrinsic self-modulation as inhibitory, and driving inputs set to premotor areas. Our findings revealed that motor slowing was associated with a significant reduction in SM1 self-inhibition, as uncovered by testing the maximum à posteriori against 0 (t(23)=-4.51, p < 0.001). Additionally, the model revealed a significant decrease in the driving input to premotor areas (t(23) > 2.71, p < 0.05) suggesting that structures other than cortical motor areas may contribute to motor fatigability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02840-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02840-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
当必须长时间维持具有挑战性的运动任务时,就会出现运动疲劳。这种现象在日常生活中经常出现,患者和健康人都会受到影响。运动性疲劳可以通过简单的任务来测量,如以最大速度敲击手指30秒,这通常会导致敲击频率迅速降低,这种现象被称为运动迟缓。在之前的一项研究(Bächinger et al, eLife, 8 (September), https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46750 , 2019)中,我们发现运动减慢与初级感觉运动皮层(SM1)、辅助运动区(SMA)和背侧运动前皮层(PMd)中与血氧水平相关的信号逐渐增加同时发生。目前还不清楚是什么导致了运动减慢引起的 SM1 活动增加,也不清楚运动疲劳是否会影响 SM1、SMA 和 PMd 之间的动态相互作用。在此,我们对在功能磁共振成像中收集到的 24 名健康年轻参与者的数据进行了动态因果建模 (DCM),以回答这一问题。感兴趣区(ROI)是根据 SM1、SMA 和 PMd 的激活峰值定义的。模型空间由所有 ROI 之间的双侧连接组成,内在自我调节为抑制性,驱动输入设置为前运动区。我们的研究结果表明,运动减慢与 SM1 自我抑制的显著降低有关,这可以通过对 0 进行最大后验发现(t(23)=-4.51, p 2.71, p 2.71)。
Dynamic causal modelling highlights the importance of decreased self-inhibition of the sensorimotor cortex in motor fatigability.
Motor fatigability emerges when challenging motor tasks must be maintained over an extended period of time. It is frequently observed in everyday life and affects patients as well as healthy individuals. Motor fatigability can be measured using simple tasks like finger tapping at maximum speed for 30 s. This typically results in a rapid decrease of tapping frequency, a phenomenon called motor slowing. In a previous study (Bächinger et al, eLife, 8 (September), https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.46750 , 2019), we showed that motor slowing goes hand in hand with a gradual increase in blood oxygen level dependent signal in the primary sensorimotor cortex (SM1), supplementary motor area (SMA), and dorsal premotor cortex (PMd). It is unclear what drives the activity increase in SM1 caused by motor slowing and whether motor fatigability affects the dynamic interactions between SM1, SMA, and PMd. Here, we performed dynamic causal modelling (DCM) on data of 24 healthy young participants collected during functional magnetic resonance imaging to answer this question. The regions of interest (ROI) were defined based on the peak activation within SM1, SMA, and PMd. The model space consisted of bilateral connections between all ROI, with intrinsic self-modulation as inhibitory, and driving inputs set to premotor areas. Our findings revealed that motor slowing was associated with a significant reduction in SM1 self-inhibition, as uncovered by testing the maximum à posteriori against 0 (t(23)=-4.51, p < 0.001). Additionally, the model revealed a significant decrease in the driving input to premotor areas (t(23) > 2.71, p < 0.05) suggesting that structures other than cortical motor areas may contribute to motor fatigability.
期刊介绍:
Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.