乳腺癌内分泌治疗相关毒性的药物遗传学:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 GENETICS & HEREDITY Cancer Genomics & Proteomics Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.21873/cgp.20461
Kinan Mokbel, Michael Weedon, Victoria Moye, Leigh Jackson
{"title":"乳腺癌内分泌治疗相关毒性的药物遗传学:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Kinan Mokbel, Michael Weedon, Victoria Moye, Leigh Jackson","doi":"10.21873/cgp.20461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Yet, it is accompanied by treatment-related toxicities, leading to poor treatment adherence, high relapse, and low rates of survival. While pharmacogenomic variants have the potential to guide personalized treatment, their predictive value is inconsistent across published studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To systematically assess the literature's current landscape of pharmacogenomics of endocrine therapy-related adverse drug effects, systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PharmGKB databases were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 87 articles. Substantial heterogeneity and variability in pharmacogenomic effects were evident across studies, with many using data from the same cohorts and predominantly focusing on the Caucasian population and postmenopausal women. Meta-analyses revealed Factor V Leiden mutation as a predictor of thromboembolic events in tamoxifen-treated women (p<0.0001). Meta-analyses also found that rs7984870 and rs2234693 were associated with musculoskeletal toxicities in postmenopausal women receiving aromatase inhibitors (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the current body of evidence regarding the potential role of pharmacogenomics in endocrine therapy-related toxicity in BC remains largely inconclusive. Key concerns include the heterogeneity in toxicity definitions, lack of consideration for genotype-treatment interactions, and the failure to account for multiple testing. The review underscores the necessity for larger and well-designed studies, particularly with the inclusion of premenopausal women and non-Caucasian populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":9516,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363930/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacogenetics of Toxicities Related to Endocrine Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kinan Mokbel, Michael Weedon, Victoria Moye, Leigh Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/cgp.20461\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Yet, it is accompanied by treatment-related toxicities, leading to poor treatment adherence, high relapse, and low rates of survival. While pharmacogenomic variants have the potential to guide personalized treatment, their predictive value is inconsistent across published studies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To systematically assess the literature's current landscape of pharmacogenomics of endocrine therapy-related adverse drug effects, systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PharmGKB databases were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 87 articles. Substantial heterogeneity and variability in pharmacogenomic effects were evident across studies, with many using data from the same cohorts and predominantly focusing on the Caucasian population and postmenopausal women. Meta-analyses revealed Factor V Leiden mutation as a predictor of thromboembolic events in tamoxifen-treated women (p<0.0001). Meta-analyses also found that rs7984870 and rs2234693 were associated with musculoskeletal toxicities in postmenopausal women receiving aromatase inhibitors (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, the current body of evidence regarding the potential role of pharmacogenomics in endocrine therapy-related toxicity in BC remains largely inconclusive. Key concerns include the heterogeneity in toxicity definitions, lack of consideration for genotype-treatment interactions, and the failure to account for multiple testing. The review underscores the necessity for larger and well-designed studies, particularly with the inclusion of premenopausal women and non-Caucasian populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363930/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20461\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Genomics & Proteomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cgp.20461","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:内分泌治疗是激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌(BC)的标准治疗方法。然而,内分泌治疗伴随着治疗相关毒性,导致治疗依从性差、复发率高、生存率低。虽然药物基因组变异具有指导个性化治疗的潜力,但其预测价值在已发表的研究中并不一致:为了系统评估内分泌治疗相关药物不良反应药物基因组学的文献现状,我们在 MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane CENTRAL、Google Scholar 和 PharmGKB 数据库中进行了系统检索:结果:我们发现了 87 篇文章。不同研究在药物基因组学效应方面存在明显的异质性和可变性,其中许多研究使用了来自相同队列的数据,且主要集中于白种人和绝经后妇女。元分析显示,因子 V Leiden 突变是他莫昔芬治疗女性血栓栓塞事件的预测因子(pConclusion:总体而言,目前有关药物基因组学在 BC 内分泌治疗相关毒性中的潜在作用的证据在很大程度上仍不确定。主要问题包括毒性定义的异质性、缺乏对基因型与治疗相互作用的考虑,以及未能考虑多重检测。综述强调,有必要开展规模更大、设计更合理的研究,尤其是纳入绝经前妇女和非高加索人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pharmacogenetics of Toxicities Related to Endocrine Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background/aim: Endocrine therapy is the standard treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (BC). Yet, it is accompanied by treatment-related toxicities, leading to poor treatment adherence, high relapse, and low rates of survival. While pharmacogenomic variants have the potential to guide personalized treatment, their predictive value is inconsistent across published studies.

Materials and methods: To systematically assess the literature's current landscape of pharmacogenomics of endocrine therapy-related adverse drug effects, systematic searches in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar and PharmGKB databases were conducted.

Results: We identified 87 articles. Substantial heterogeneity and variability in pharmacogenomic effects were evident across studies, with many using data from the same cohorts and predominantly focusing on the Caucasian population and postmenopausal women. Meta-analyses revealed Factor V Leiden mutation as a predictor of thromboembolic events in tamoxifen-treated women (p<0.0001). Meta-analyses also found that rs7984870 and rs2234693 were associated with musculoskeletal toxicities in postmenopausal women receiving aromatase inhibitors (p<0.0001 and p<0.0001, respectively).

Conclusion: Overall, the current body of evidence regarding the potential role of pharmacogenomics in endocrine therapy-related toxicity in BC remains largely inconclusive. Key concerns include the heterogeneity in toxicity definitions, lack of consideration for genotype-treatment interactions, and the failure to account for multiple testing. The review underscores the necessity for larger and well-designed studies, particularly with the inclusion of premenopausal women and non-Caucasian populations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
Cancer Genomics & Proteomics ONCOLOGY-GENETICS & HEREDITY
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Cancer Genomics & Proteomics (CGP) is an international peer-reviewed journal designed to publish rapidly high quality articles and reviews on the application of genomic and proteomic technology to basic, experimental and clinical cancer research. In this site you may find information concerning the editorial board, editorial policy, issue contents, subscriptions, submission of manuscripts and advertising. The first issue of CGP circulated in January 2004. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics is a journal of the International Institute of Anticancer Research. From January 2013 CGP is converted to an online-only open access journal. Cancer Genomics & Proteomics supports (a) the aims and the research projects of the INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ANTICANCER RESEARCH and (b) the organization of the INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES OF ANTICANCER RESEARCH.
期刊最新文献
Desert Hedgehog Down-regulation Mediates Inhibition of Proliferation by γ-Glutamylcyclotransferase Knockdown in Murine Glioblastoma Stem Cells. DNA Methylation in Recurrent Glioblastomas: Increased TEM8 Expression Activates the Src/PI3K/AKT/GSK-3β/B-Catenin Pathway. Impacts of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Promoter Genotypes on Breast Cancer Risk. P53 Status Influences the Anti-proliferative Effect Induced by IFITM1 Inhibition in Estrogen Receptor-positive Breast Cancer Cells. Pharmacogenetics of Toxicities Related to Endocrine Treatment in Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1