经导管动脉栓塞治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征:44 例患者的回顾性研究

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s00270-024-03842-6
Takatoshi Kubo, Masahiko Shibuya, Koichi Miyazaki, Yusuke Tsuji, Masaya Nakata, Atsuhiko Kawabe, Takashi Nakasone, Nobuaki Sakai, Yuji Okuno
{"title":"经导管动脉栓塞治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征:44 例患者的回顾性研究","authors":"Takatoshi Kubo, Masahiko Shibuya, Koichi Miyazaki, Yusuke Tsuji, Masaya Nakata, Atsuhiko Kawabe, Takashi Nakasone, Nobuaki Sakai, Yuji Okuno","doi":"10.1007/s00270-024-03842-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the preliminary treatment outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with refractory CP/CPPS who underwent TAE between April 2022 and February 2023. All patients had persistent pelvic pain for at least 3 months, a total score of at least 15 on the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), and lacked evidence of infection. All procedures were performed by injecting imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) from bilateral prostatic arteries ± internal pudendal arteries. NIH-CPSI, pain numeric rating scale (NRS), and complications were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 48 patients, 44 were included in this study, with four excluded because of loss of follow-up. No severe procedure-related complications were observed. Pretreatment and post-treatment evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up (mean 16.6 months) revealed a decrease in the mean NIH-CPSI scores from 27 ± 6 to 21 ± 8, 20 ± 9, 17 ± 9, and 18 ± 9, respectively (all P < 0.001). Pain NRS scores were also decreased from 7.0 ± 1.6 to 4.8 ± 2.5, 4.1 ± 2.6, 3.7 ± 2.4, and 3.4 ± 2.3, respectively (all P < 0.001). The proportions of clinical success, defined as a reduction of at least 6 points from baseline in the NIH-CPSI, at 6 months after TAE and at the final follow-up were 70 and 64%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence of the feasibility of TAE using IPM/CS for CP/CPPS, suggesting both symptomatic improvement and safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9591,"journal":{"name":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of 44 Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Takatoshi Kubo, Masahiko Shibuya, Koichi Miyazaki, Yusuke Tsuji, Masaya Nakata, Atsuhiko Kawabe, Takashi Nakasone, Nobuaki Sakai, Yuji Okuno\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00270-024-03842-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the preliminary treatment outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective study included patients with refractory CP/CPPS who underwent TAE between April 2022 and February 2023. All patients had persistent pelvic pain for at least 3 months, a total score of at least 15 on the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), and lacked evidence of infection. All procedures were performed by injecting imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) from bilateral prostatic arteries ± internal pudendal arteries. NIH-CPSI, pain numeric rating scale (NRS), and complications were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 48 patients, 44 were included in this study, with four excluded because of loss of follow-up. No severe procedure-related complications were observed. Pretreatment and post-treatment evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up (mean 16.6 months) revealed a decrease in the mean NIH-CPSI scores from 27 ± 6 to 21 ± 8, 20 ± 9, 17 ± 9, and 18 ± 9, respectively (all P < 0.001). Pain NRS scores were also decreased from 7.0 ± 1.6 to 4.8 ± 2.5, 4.1 ± 2.6, 3.7 ± 2.4, and 3.4 ± 2.3, respectively (all P < 0.001). The proportions of clinical success, defined as a reduction of at least 6 points from baseline in the NIH-CPSI, at 6 months after TAE and at the final follow-up were 70 and 64%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides evidence of the feasibility of TAE using IPM/CS for CP/CPPS, suggesting both symptomatic improvement and safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9591,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03842-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03842-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨经导管动脉栓塞术(TAE)治疗慢性前列腺炎/慢性盆腔疼痛综合征(CP/CPPS)的初步疗效:这项回顾性研究纳入了2022年4月至2023年2月期间接受TAE治疗的难治性CP/CPPS患者。所有患者均有至少3个月的持续性盆腔疼痛,NIH-慢性前列腺炎症状指数(NIH-CPSI)总分至少为15分,且无感染证据。所有手术都是通过从双侧前列腺动脉±耻骨内动脉注射亚胺培南/西司他丁钠(IPM/CS)进行的。在首次 TAE 后的 1、3 和 6 个月以及最终随访时,对 NIH-CPSI、疼痛数字评分量表(NRS)和并发症进行了评估:在 48 名患者中,有 44 人被纳入本研究,其中 4 人因失去随访而被排除在外。未发现严重的手术相关并发症。在首次 TAE 术后 1、3 和 6 个月以及最后随访(平均 16.6 个月)时进行的治疗前和治疗后评估显示,NIH-CPSI 平均得分分别从 27±6 分降至 21±8 分、20±9 分、17±9 分和 18±9 分(均为 P):这项研究证明了使用 IPM/CS 进行 TAE 治疗 CP/CPPS 的可行性,同时也表明了症状改善和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: A Retrospective Study of 44 Patients.

Purpose: To investigate the preliminary treatment outcomes of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).

Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients with refractory CP/CPPS who underwent TAE between April 2022 and February 2023. All patients had persistent pelvic pain for at least 3 months, a total score of at least 15 on the NIH-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI), and lacked evidence of infection. All procedures were performed by injecting imipenem/cilastatin sodium (IPM/CS) from bilateral prostatic arteries ± internal pudendal arteries. NIH-CPSI, pain numeric rating scale (NRS), and complications were evaluated at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up.

Results: Out of 48 patients, 44 were included in this study, with four excluded because of loss of follow-up. No severe procedure-related complications were observed. Pretreatment and post-treatment evaluations at 1, 3, and 6 months after the initial TAE and at the final follow-up (mean 16.6 months) revealed a decrease in the mean NIH-CPSI scores from 27 ± 6 to 21 ± 8, 20 ± 9, 17 ± 9, and 18 ± 9, respectively (all P < 0.001). Pain NRS scores were also decreased from 7.0 ± 1.6 to 4.8 ± 2.5, 4.1 ± 2.6, 3.7 ± 2.4, and 3.4 ± 2.3, respectively (all P < 0.001). The proportions of clinical success, defined as a reduction of at least 6 points from baseline in the NIH-CPSI, at 6 months after TAE and at the final follow-up were 70 and 64%, respectively.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of the feasibility of TAE using IPM/CS for CP/CPPS, suggesting both symptomatic improvement and safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
13.80%
发文量
306
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology (CVIR) is the official journal of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe, and is also the official organ of a number of additional distinguished national and international interventional radiological societies. CVIR publishes double blinded peer-reviewed original research work including clinical and laboratory investigations, technical notes, case reports, works in progress, and letters to the editor, as well as review articles, pictorial essays, editorials, and special invited submissions in the field of vascular and interventional radiology. Beside the communication of the latest research results in this field, it is also the aim of CVIR to support continuous medical education. Articles that are accepted for publication are done so with the understanding that they, or their substantive contents, have not been and will not be submitted to any other publication.
期刊最新文献
Technical Considerations for Safety and Efficacy: Microballoon-Occluded Transcatheter Embolization Using n-butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate for Treatment of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation Transpleural Inferior Phrenic Artery to Pulmonary Artery Fistula: An Increasingly Common and Important Vascular Anomaly Percutaneous Management of an Unstable Pathological Fracture of L5 Using Vertical Presacral Screw Fixation and Cementoplasty Non-perforating Temporary Diameter Reduction Ties for Physician-Modified Endografts Invited Commentary on using ChatGPT to Improve Readability of Interventional Radiology Procedure Descriptions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1