产科暴力流行病学:对巴西情况的叙述性回顾。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Ciencia & saude coletiva Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-13 DOI:10.1590/1413-81232024299.12222023
Tatiana Henriques Leite, Emanuele Souza Marques, Rachel Geber Corrêa, Maria do Carmo Leal, Bheatriz da Costa Diniz Olegário, Rafaelle Mendes da Costa, Marilia Arndt Mesenburg
{"title":"产科暴力流行病学:对巴西情况的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Tatiana Henriques Leite, Emanuele Souza Marques, Rachel Geber Corrêa, Maria do Carmo Leal, Bheatriz da Costa Diniz Olegário, Rafaelle Mendes da Costa, Marilia Arndt Mesenburg","doi":"10.1590/1413-81232024299.12222023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this review is to present the state of the art regarding obstetric violence in Brazil. The most commonly used terms are \"obstetric violence,\" \"disrespect and abuse,\" and \"mistreatment\". Concerning measurement, the most widely used instrument is based on the definition of \"mistreatment,\" still in its early stages of evaluation and lacking adaptation to Brazil. The prevalence of obstetric violence varies widely in national studies due to methodological factors and the type of postpartum women considered. Regarding risk factors, adolescent or women over 35, non-white, with low education levels, users of the public health system (SUS), those who had vaginal birth or abortion, are at higher risk. Hierarchical relationships between the healthcare team and the family are also relevant, as well as inadequate hospital structures, bed shortages, and insufficient healthcare professionals, which contribute to obstetric violence. The consequences of this violence include an increased risk of postpartum depression and PTSD, reduced likelihood of attending postpartum and childcare consultations, and difficulties in exclusive breastfeeding. Interventions to mitigate obstetric violence should consider women's empowerment, healthcare professionals' training, monitoring obstetric violence, and legal support.</p>","PeriodicalId":10195,"journal":{"name":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","volume":"29 9","pages":"e12222023"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Epidemiology of obstetric violence: a narrative review of the Brazilian context.\",\"authors\":\"Tatiana Henriques Leite, Emanuele Souza Marques, Rachel Geber Corrêa, Maria do Carmo Leal, Bheatriz da Costa Diniz Olegário, Rafaelle Mendes da Costa, Marilia Arndt Mesenburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1413-81232024299.12222023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this review is to present the state of the art regarding obstetric violence in Brazil. The most commonly used terms are \\\"obstetric violence,\\\" \\\"disrespect and abuse,\\\" and \\\"mistreatment\\\". Concerning measurement, the most widely used instrument is based on the definition of \\\"mistreatment,\\\" still in its early stages of evaluation and lacking adaptation to Brazil. The prevalence of obstetric violence varies widely in national studies due to methodological factors and the type of postpartum women considered. Regarding risk factors, adolescent or women over 35, non-white, with low education levels, users of the public health system (SUS), those who had vaginal birth or abortion, are at higher risk. Hierarchical relationships between the healthcare team and the family are also relevant, as well as inadequate hospital structures, bed shortages, and insufficient healthcare professionals, which contribute to obstetric violence. The consequences of this violence include an increased risk of postpartum depression and PTSD, reduced likelihood of attending postpartum and childcare consultations, and difficulties in exclusive breastfeeding. Interventions to mitigate obstetric violence should consider women's empowerment, healthcare professionals' training, monitoring obstetric violence, and legal support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"volume\":\"29 9\",\"pages\":\"e12222023\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ciencia & saude coletiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232024299.12222023\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/9/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ciencia & saude coletiva","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232024299.12222023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在介绍巴西产科暴力的最新情况。最常用的术语是 "产科暴力"、"不尊重和虐待 "以及 "虐待"。关于测量,最广泛使用的工具是基于 "虐待 "的定义,但仍处于早期评估阶段,缺乏对巴西的适应性。由于方法因素和所考虑的产后妇女类型不同,各国研究中产科暴力的发生率差异很大。关于风险因素,青少年或 35 岁以上的妇女、非白人、受教育程度低、使用公共卫生系统(SUS)、经阴道分娩或流产的妇女风险较高。医护团队与家庭之间的等级关系,以及医院结构不完善、床位短缺、医护人员不足等因素也是产科暴力的诱因。产科暴力的后果包括产后抑郁和创伤后应激障碍的风险增加、产后就诊和育儿就诊的可能性降低以及纯母乳喂养困难。减轻产科暴力的干预措施应考虑赋予妇女权力、培训医疗保健专业人员、监测产科暴力和提供法律支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Epidemiology of obstetric violence: a narrative review of the Brazilian context.

The aim of this review is to present the state of the art regarding obstetric violence in Brazil. The most commonly used terms are "obstetric violence," "disrespect and abuse," and "mistreatment". Concerning measurement, the most widely used instrument is based on the definition of "mistreatment," still in its early stages of evaluation and lacking adaptation to Brazil. The prevalence of obstetric violence varies widely in national studies due to methodological factors and the type of postpartum women considered. Regarding risk factors, adolescent or women over 35, non-white, with low education levels, users of the public health system (SUS), those who had vaginal birth or abortion, are at higher risk. Hierarchical relationships between the healthcare team and the family are also relevant, as well as inadequate hospital structures, bed shortages, and insufficient healthcare professionals, which contribute to obstetric violence. The consequences of this violence include an increased risk of postpartum depression and PTSD, reduced likelihood of attending postpartum and childcare consultations, and difficulties in exclusive breastfeeding. Interventions to mitigate obstetric violence should consider women's empowerment, healthcare professionals' training, monitoring obstetric violence, and legal support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ciencia & saude coletiva
Ciencia & saude coletiva PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
533
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ciência & Saúde Coletiva publishes debates, analyses, and results of research on a Specific Theme considered current and relevant to the field of Collective Health. Its abbreviated title is Ciênc. saúde coletiva, which should be used in bibliographies, footnotes and bibliographical references and strips.
期刊最新文献
[Cooperative Intelligence Platform for Primary Health Care (Picaps): techno-scientific solutions in digital health to confront COVID-19 and other crises]. [Dictatorship, Health and Propaganda: The National Immunization Program (PNI) and the media campaign for compulsory vaccination]. [Doctors of the dictatorship: physicians and human rights violations in Brazil (1964-1985)]. [Health care under the military government (1964-1985) and its legacy for the SUS: the public-private hybrid Unified Health System]. [Impure blood: specialists, institutions, and cultural authority in the context of AIDS in Brazil].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1