新型虚弱指数可预测老年食管癌患者食管切除术的短期疗效

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Current oncology Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.3390/curroncol31080349
Thomas Boerner, Marisa Sewell, Amy L Tin, Andrew J Vickers, Caitlin Harrington-Baksh, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Bernard J Park, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Robert J Downey, Armin Shahrokni, Daniela Molena
{"title":"新型虚弱指数可预测老年食管癌患者食管切除术的短期疗效","authors":"Thomas Boerner, Marisa Sewell, Amy L Tin, Andrew J Vickers, Caitlin Harrington-Baksh, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Bernard J Park, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Robert J Downey, Armin Shahrokni, Daniela Molena","doi":"10.3390/curroncol31080349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Frailty, rather than age, is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine whether preoperative frailty as defined by a novel scoring system could predict the outcomes among older patients undergoing esophagectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We identified patients 65 years or older who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. Frailty was assessed using the MSK-FI, which consists of 1 component related to functional status and 10 medical comorbidities. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to test for the associations between frailty and short-term outcomes, with continuous frailty score as the predictor and additionally adjusted for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. <b>Results:</b> In total, 447 patients were included in the analysis (median age of 71 years [interquartile range, 68-75]). Most of the patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment (81%), an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (86%), and minimally invasive surgery (55%). A total of 22 patients (4.9%) died within 90 days of surgery, 144 (32%) had a major complication, 81 (19%) were readmitted, and 31 (7.2%) were discharged to a facility. Of the patients who died within 90 days, 19 had a major complication, yielding a failure-to-rescue rate of 13%. The risk of 30-day major complications (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.41]; <i>p</i> = 0.001), readmissions (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13-1.52]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and discharge to a facility (OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.49-2.37]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) increased with increasing frailty. Frailty and 90-day mortality were not associated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Frailty assessment during surgery decision-making can identify patients with a high risk of morbidity.</p>","PeriodicalId":11012,"journal":{"name":"Current oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Frailty Index Can Predict the Short-Term Outcomes of Esophagectomy in Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Boerner, Marisa Sewell, Amy L Tin, Andrew J Vickers, Caitlin Harrington-Baksh, Manjit S Bains, Matthew J Bott, Bernard J Park, Smita Sihag, David R Jones, Robert J Downey, Armin Shahrokni, Daniela Molena\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/curroncol31080349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Frailty, rather than age, is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine whether preoperative frailty as defined by a novel scoring system could predict the outcomes among older patients undergoing esophagectomy. <b>Methods:</b> We identified patients 65 years or older who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. Frailty was assessed using the MSK-FI, which consists of 1 component related to functional status and 10 medical comorbidities. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to test for the associations between frailty and short-term outcomes, with continuous frailty score as the predictor and additionally adjusted for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. <b>Results:</b> In total, 447 patients were included in the analysis (median age of 71 years [interquartile range, 68-75]). Most of the patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment (81%), an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (86%), and minimally invasive surgery (55%). A total of 22 patients (4.9%) died within 90 days of surgery, 144 (32%) had a major complication, 81 (19%) were readmitted, and 31 (7.2%) were discharged to a facility. Of the patients who died within 90 days, 19 had a major complication, yielding a failure-to-rescue rate of 13%. The risk of 30-day major complications (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.41]; <i>p</i> = 0.001), readmissions (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13-1.52]; <i>p</i> < 0.001), and discharge to a facility (OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.49-2.37]; <i>p</i> < 0.001) increased with increasing frailty. Frailty and 90-day mortality were not associated. <b>Conclusions:</b> Frailty assessment during surgery decision-making can identify patients with a high risk of morbidity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11352928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080349\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31080349","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与术后发病率和死亡率相关的是体弱而非年龄。我们试图确定一种新型评分系统所定义的术前虚弱程度能否预测接受食管切除术的老年患者的预后。方法:我们确定了 2011 年至 2021 年期间在本院接受食管切除术的 65 岁或以上患者。采用 MSK-FI 评估虚弱程度,MSK-FI 包括 1 个与功能状态相关的组成部分和 10 个医疗合并症。我们使用多变量逻辑回归模型来检验虚弱与短期预后之间的关系,以连续的虚弱评分作为预测指标,并对年龄和东部合作肿瘤学组的表现状态进行额外调整。结果共有 447 名患者纳入分析(中位年龄为 71 岁[四分位数间距为 68-75])。大部分患者接受了新辅助治疗(81%)、Ivor Lewis 食管切除术(86%)和微创手术(55%)。共有 22 名患者(4.9%)在术后 90 天内死亡,144 名患者(32%)出现重大并发症,81 名患者(19%)再次入院,31 名患者(7.2%)出院。在90天内死亡的患者中,19人出现主要并发症,抢救失败率为13%。30天内出现主要并发症(OR,1.24 [95% CI,1.09-1.41];P = 0.001)、再次入院(OR,1.31 [95% CI,1.13-1.52];P <0.001)和出院(OR,1.86 [95% CI,1.49-2.37];P <0.001)的风险随着体弱程度的增加而增加。体弱与 90 天死亡率无关。结论在手术决策过程中进行虚弱程度评估可识别出发病风险较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Novel Frailty Index Can Predict the Short-Term Outcomes of Esophagectomy in Older Patients with Esophageal Cancer.

Background: Frailty, rather than age, is associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality. We sought to determine whether preoperative frailty as defined by a novel scoring system could predict the outcomes among older patients undergoing esophagectomy. Methods: We identified patients 65 years or older who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021 at our institution. Frailty was assessed using the MSK-FI, which consists of 1 component related to functional status and 10 medical comorbidities. We used a multivariable logistic regression model to test for the associations between frailty and short-term outcomes, with continuous frailty score as the predictor and additionally adjusted for age and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. Results: In total, 447 patients were included in the analysis (median age of 71 years [interquartile range, 68-75]). Most of the patients underwent neoadjuvant treatment (81%), an Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (86%), and minimally invasive surgery (55%). A total of 22 patients (4.9%) died within 90 days of surgery, 144 (32%) had a major complication, 81 (19%) were readmitted, and 31 (7.2%) were discharged to a facility. Of the patients who died within 90 days, 19 had a major complication, yielding a failure-to-rescue rate of 13%. The risk of 30-day major complications (OR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.09-1.41]; p = 0.001), readmissions (OR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13-1.52]; p < 0.001), and discharge to a facility (OR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.49-2.37]; p < 0.001) increased with increasing frailty. Frailty and 90-day mortality were not associated. Conclusions: Frailty assessment during surgery decision-making can identify patients with a high risk of morbidity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current oncology
Current oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
664
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Current Oncology is a peer-reviewed, Canadian-based and internationally respected journal. Current Oncology represents a multidisciplinary medium encompassing health care workers in the field of cancer therapy in Canada to report upon and to review progress in the management of this disease. We encourage submissions from all fields of cancer medicine, including radiation oncology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, pediatric oncology, pathology, and cancer rehabilitation and survivorship. Articles published in the journal typically contain information that is relevant directly to clinical oncology practice, and have clear potential for application to the current or future practice of cancer medicine.
期刊最新文献
Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia by Docetaxel: Prevalence, Treatment and Prevention. A Preliminary Analysis of Circulating Tumor Microemboli from Breast Cancer Patients during Follow-Up Visits. Canadian Expert Recommendations on Safety Overview and Toxicity Management Strategies for Sacituzumab Govitecan Based on Use in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Real-World Treatment Patterns, Sequencing, and Outcomes in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Avelumab First-Line Maintenance in the United States. The Clinical Utilisation and Duration of Treatment with HER2-Directed Therapies in HER2-Positive Recurrent or Metastatic Salivary Gland Cancers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1