脑外伤传统严重程度类别中早期血液生物标志物与 6 个月功能结果的关联:捕捉连续的损伤谱。

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL EBioMedicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105298
Lindsay Wilson, Virginia F J Newcombe, Daniel P Whitehouse, Stefania Mondello, Andrew I R Maas, David K Menon
{"title":"脑外伤传统严重程度类别中早期血液生物标志物与 6 个月功能结果的关联:捕捉连续的损伤谱。","authors":"Lindsay Wilson, Virginia F J Newcombe, Daniel P Whitehouse, Stefania Mondello, Andrew I R Maas, David K Menon","doi":"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury is conventionally categorised as mild, moderate, or severe on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Recently developed biomarkers can provide more objective and nuanced measures of the extent of brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exposure-response relationships were investigated in 2479 patients aged ≥16 enrolled in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study. Neurofilament protein-light (NFL), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were assayed from serum sampled in the first 24 h; concentrations were divided into quintiles within GCS severity groups. Relationships with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended were examined using modified Poisson regression including age, sex, major extracranial injury, time to sample, and log biomarker concentration as covariates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Within severity groups there were associations between biomarkers and outcomes after adjustment for covariates: GCS 13-15 and negative CT imaging (relative risks [RRs] from 1.28 to 3.72), GCS 13-15 and positive CT (1.21-2.81), GCS 9-12 (1.16-2.02), GCS 3-8 (1.09-1.94). RRs were associated with clinically important differences in expectations of prognosis. In patients with GCS 3 (RRs 1.51-1.80) percentages of unfavourable outcome were 37-51% in the lowest quintiles of biomarker levels and reached 90-94% in the highest quintiles. Similarly, for GCS 15 (RRs 1.83-3.79), the percentages were 2-4% and 19-28% in the lowest and highest biomarker quintiles, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Conventional TBI severity classification is inadequate and underestimates heterogeneity of brain injury and associated outcomes. The adoption of circulating biomarkers can add to clinical assessment of injury severity.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>European Union 7th Framework program (EC grant 602150), Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, Neuro-Trauma Sciences, NIHR Rosetrees Trust.</p>","PeriodicalId":11494,"journal":{"name":"EBioMedicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11400615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of early blood-based biomarkers and six-month functional outcomes in conventional severity categories of traumatic brain injury: capturing the continuous spectrum of injury.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Wilson, Virginia F J Newcombe, Daniel P Whitehouse, Stefania Mondello, Andrew I R Maas, David K Menon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury is conventionally categorised as mild, moderate, or severe on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Recently developed biomarkers can provide more objective and nuanced measures of the extent of brain injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exposure-response relationships were investigated in 2479 patients aged ≥16 enrolled in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study. Neurofilament protein-light (NFL), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were assayed from serum sampled in the first 24 h; concentrations were divided into quintiles within GCS severity groups. Relationships with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended were examined using modified Poisson regression including age, sex, major extracranial injury, time to sample, and log biomarker concentration as covariates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Within severity groups there were associations between biomarkers and outcomes after adjustment for covariates: GCS 13-15 and negative CT imaging (relative risks [RRs] from 1.28 to 3.72), GCS 13-15 and positive CT (1.21-2.81), GCS 9-12 (1.16-2.02), GCS 3-8 (1.09-1.94). RRs were associated with clinically important differences in expectations of prognosis. In patients with GCS 3 (RRs 1.51-1.80) percentages of unfavourable outcome were 37-51% in the lowest quintiles of biomarker levels and reached 90-94% in the highest quintiles. Similarly, for GCS 15 (RRs 1.83-3.79), the percentages were 2-4% and 19-28% in the lowest and highest biomarker quintiles, respectively.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Conventional TBI severity classification is inadequate and underestimates heterogeneity of brain injury and associated outcomes. The adoption of circulating biomarkers can add to clinical assessment of injury severity.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>European Union 7th Framework program (EC grant 602150), Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, Neuro-Trauma Sciences, NIHR Rosetrees Trust.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11400615/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EBioMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105298\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EBioMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105298","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:按照传统的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS),创伤性脑损伤可分为轻度、中度和重度。最近开发的生物标志物可提供更客观、更细致的脑损伤程度测量方法:方法:对参加欧洲创伤性脑损伤神经创伤有效性合作研究(CENTER-TBI)前瞻性观察队列研究的 2479 名年龄≥16 岁的患者进行了暴露-反应关系调查。在最初 24 小时内采集的血清样本中检测了神经丝蛋白-光(NFL)、泛素羧基末端水解酶 L1(UCH-L1)和胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP)的浓度;在 GCS 严重程度组内将浓度分为五等分。使用改良泊松回归(包括年龄、性别、主要颅外损伤、采样时间和生物标记物浓度对数作为协变量)检验了与格拉斯哥结果量表扩展版之间的关系:在对共变量进行调整后,严重程度组内的生物标志物与结果之间存在关联:GCS 13-15 和阴性 CT 成像(相对风险 [RRs] 从 1.28 到 3.72),GCS 13-15 和阳性 CT(1.21-2.81),GCS 9-12(1.16-2.02),GCS 3-8(1.09-1.94)。RRs与预后预期的临床重要差异有关。在 GCS 3(RRs 为 1.51-1.80)的患者中,生物标记物水平最低五分位数的不利预后百分比为 37-51%,最高五分位数的不利预后百分比达到 90-94%。同样,对于 GCS 15(RRs 1.83-3.79),生物标志物水平最低和最高五分位数的百分比分别为 2-4%和 19-28%:解读:传统的创伤性脑损伤严重程度分类是不够的,而且低估了脑损伤的异质性和相关结果。采用循环生物标志物可增加对损伤严重程度的临床评估:欧盟第七框架计划(EC grant 602150)、Hannelore Kohl Stiftung、One Mind、Integra LifeSciences、Neuro-Trauma Sciences、NIHR Rosetrees Trust。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Association of early blood-based biomarkers and six-month functional outcomes in conventional severity categories of traumatic brain injury: capturing the continuous spectrum of injury.

Background: Traumatic brain injury is conventionally categorised as mild, moderate, or severe on the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Recently developed biomarkers can provide more objective and nuanced measures of the extent of brain injury.

Methods: Exposure-response relationships were investigated in 2479 patients aged ≥16 enrolled in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) prospective observational cohort study. Neurofilament protein-light (NFL), ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) were assayed from serum sampled in the first 24 h; concentrations were divided into quintiles within GCS severity groups. Relationships with the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended were examined using modified Poisson regression including age, sex, major extracranial injury, time to sample, and log biomarker concentration as covariates.

Findings: Within severity groups there were associations between biomarkers and outcomes after adjustment for covariates: GCS 13-15 and negative CT imaging (relative risks [RRs] from 1.28 to 3.72), GCS 13-15 and positive CT (1.21-2.81), GCS 9-12 (1.16-2.02), GCS 3-8 (1.09-1.94). RRs were associated with clinically important differences in expectations of prognosis. In patients with GCS 3 (RRs 1.51-1.80) percentages of unfavourable outcome were 37-51% in the lowest quintiles of biomarker levels and reached 90-94% in the highest quintiles. Similarly, for GCS 15 (RRs 1.83-3.79), the percentages were 2-4% and 19-28% in the lowest and highest biomarker quintiles, respectively.

Interpretation: Conventional TBI severity classification is inadequate and underestimates heterogeneity of brain injury and associated outcomes. The adoption of circulating biomarkers can add to clinical assessment of injury severity.

Funding: European Union 7th Framework program (EC grant 602150), Hannelore Kohl Stiftung, One Mind, Integra LifeSciences, Neuro-Trauma Sciences, NIHR Rosetrees Trust.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EBioMedicine
EBioMedicine Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
0.90%
发文量
579
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: eBioMedicine is a comprehensive biomedical research journal that covers a wide range of studies that are relevant to human health. Our focus is on original research that explores the fundamental factors influencing human health and disease, including the discovery of new therapeutic targets and treatments, the identification of biomarkers and diagnostic tools, and the investigation and modification of disease pathways and mechanisms. We welcome studies from any biomedical discipline that contribute to our understanding of disease and aim to improve human health.
期刊最新文献
Adoptive T cell therapies for solid tumors: T(I)ME is of the essence. Protecting vulnerable populations in extreme heat - a growing and pervasive health challenge. Identifying WHO global priority endemic pathogens for vaccine research and development (R&D) using multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA): an objective of the Immunization Agenda 2030. Association between seizure reduction during ketogenic diet treatment of epilepsy and changes in circulatory metabolites and gut microbiota composition. Identification of late-stage tau accumulation using plasma phospho-tau217.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1