仅患有 MASLD 的患者与患有 MAFLD 和 MASLD 的患者的临床特征和死亡率比较。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Hepatology International Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1007/s12072-024-10721-2
Mingqian Jiang, Ziyan Pan, Jacob George, Mohammed Eslam
{"title":"仅患有 MASLD 的患者与患有 MAFLD 和 MASLD 的患者的临床特征和死亡率比较。","authors":"Mingqian Jiang, Ziyan Pan, Jacob George, Mohammed Eslam","doi":"10.1007/s12072-024-10721-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The applicability of the proposed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) definition has not been validated. We aimed to characterize the profiles and long-term survival of people meeting the criteria for MASLD, but not that of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), i.e. MASLD only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994, 7791 adult participants were included and categorized into four distinct groups: no SLD, non-MAFLD MASLD, MASLD-MAFLD, and cryptogenic SLD (steatosis without metabolic dysfunction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the MASLD-only group were younger and had better metabolic profiles and fibrosis degree compared to those with MASLD-MAFLD and those with no SLD. Their profiles were comparable to those with cryptogenic SLD. Similarly, the MASLD-only group tend to have lower cumulative incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Clustering analysis showed that MASLD only clusters differently from individuals with MASLD-MAFLD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MASLD only is a distinct clinical group with substantial heterogeneity compared to those captured using the MAFLD criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical features and mortality outcomes of patients with MASLD only compared to those with MAFLD and MASLD.\",\"authors\":\"Mingqian Jiang, Ziyan Pan, Jacob George, Mohammed Eslam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12072-024-10721-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The applicability of the proposed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) definition has not been validated. We aimed to characterize the profiles and long-term survival of people meeting the criteria for MASLD, but not that of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), i.e. MASLD only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994, 7791 adult participants were included and categorized into four distinct groups: no SLD, non-MAFLD MASLD, MASLD-MAFLD, and cryptogenic SLD (steatosis without metabolic dysfunction).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants in the MASLD-only group were younger and had better metabolic profiles and fibrosis degree compared to those with MASLD-MAFLD and those with no SLD. Their profiles were comparable to those with cryptogenic SLD. Similarly, the MASLD-only group tend to have lower cumulative incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Clustering analysis showed that MASLD only clusters differently from individuals with MASLD-MAFLD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>MASLD only is a distinct clinical group with substantial heterogeneity compared to those captured using the MAFLD criteria.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10721-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-024-10721-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)定义的适用性尚未得到验证。我们旨在描述符合代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MASLD)标准而不符合代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病(MAFLD)标准(即仅符合代谢功能障碍相关性脂肪性肝病)的人群的特征和长期生存情况:方法:利用 1988-1994 年第三次全国健康与营养调查(NHANES III)的数据,纳入 7791 名成年参与者,并将其分为四组:无 SLD、非 MAFLD MASLD、MASLD-MAFLD 和隐源性 SLD(无代谢功能障碍的脂肪肝):结果:与MASLD-MAFLD和无SLD患者相比,纯MASLD组患者更年轻,代谢状况和纤维化程度更好。他们的情况与隐源性 SLD 患者相当。同样,仅MASLD组的全因死亡率和心血管死亡率的累积发生率也较低。聚类分析显示,仅MASLD患者的聚类与MASLD-MAFLD患者不同:结论:与采用MAFLD标准的患者相比,仅MASLD患者是一个独特的临床群体,具有很大的异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical features and mortality outcomes of patients with MASLD only compared to those with MAFLD and MASLD.

Background and aims: The applicability of the proposed metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) definition has not been validated. We aimed to characterize the profiles and long-term survival of people meeting the criteria for MASLD, but not that of metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), i.e. MASLD only.

Methods: Using data from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) 1988-1994, 7791 adult participants were included and categorized into four distinct groups: no SLD, non-MAFLD MASLD, MASLD-MAFLD, and cryptogenic SLD (steatosis without metabolic dysfunction).

Results: Participants in the MASLD-only group were younger and had better metabolic profiles and fibrosis degree compared to those with MASLD-MAFLD and those with no SLD. Their profiles were comparable to those with cryptogenic SLD. Similarly, the MASLD-only group tend to have lower cumulative incidence of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. Clustering analysis showed that MASLD only clusters differently from individuals with MASLD-MAFLD.

Conclusions: MASLD only is a distinct clinical group with substantial heterogeneity compared to those captured using the MAFLD criteria.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics and managements of congenital hepatic hemangioma: a cohort study of 211 cases. AARC score and urine NGAL predict terlipressin non-response and mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure. Semaglutide and the risk of adverse liver outcomes in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes: a multi-institutional cohort study. Global, regional, and national epidemiology of hepatoblastoma in children from 1990 to 2021: a trend analysis. Efficacy and safety of durvalumab rechallenge in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients refractory to prior anti-PD-1 therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1