Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio
{"title":"使用漏斗形腹腔内网片预防腹股沟旁疝与不使用网片相比:烟囱随机临床试验。","authors":"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1244-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":15.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1244-1250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.
Importance: Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.
Objective: To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.
Design, setting, and participants: The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.
Intervention: In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.
Main outcome and measure: The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.
Results: There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.
Conclusions and relevance: In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.
期刊介绍:
JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.