使用漏斗形腹腔内网片预防腹股沟旁疝与不使用网片相比:烟囱随机临床试验。

IF 14.9 1区 医学 Q1 SURGERY JAMA surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260
Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio
{"title":"使用漏斗形腹腔内网片预防腹股沟旁疝与不使用网片相比:烟囱随机临床试验。","authors":"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio","doi":"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>","PeriodicalId":14690,"journal":{"name":"JAMA surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1244-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Mäkäräinen, Heikki Wiik, Maziar Nikberg, Jyrki Kössi, Monika Carpelan-Holmström, Tarja Pinta, Kirsi Lehto, Marko Nikki, Jyri Järvinen, Pasi Ohtonen, Tero Rautio\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.</p><p><strong>Main outcome and measure: </strong>The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1244-1250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11359091/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2024.3260","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:有人建议通过预防性放置网片来预防腹膜旁疝。支持这种做法的证据相互矛盾:确定漏斗状永久性人造腹膜旁网片在预防腹膜旁疝方面是否有效、安全:烟囱试验是一项随机单盲多中心试验,于 2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 9 月在芬兰的 4 家医院和瑞典的 1 家医院进行。在接受腹腔镜或机器人辅助腹腔镜切除术或哈特曼手术的439名直肠腺癌患者中,143人被纳入试验,135人接受了分配的干预,121人接受了12个月的随访分析。数据分析时间为2023年12月至2024年5月:干预组使用漏斗状腹腔内网片建立永久性结肠造口,并与未使用网片的造口对照组进行比较。主要结果和测量指标:主要终点是术后12个月经计算机断层扫描(CT)证实的腹膜旁疝的发生率:网片组有 68 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 68.7 [11.6] 岁;36 [53%] 名男性和 32 [47%] 名女性)接受了预期分配,对照组有 67 名患者(平均 [SD] 年龄为 66.4 [11.7] 岁;48 [72%] 名男性和 19 [28%] 名女性)接受了预期分配。在 12 个月的随访中,58 名网片组患者和 59 名对照组患者接受了 CT 扫描。网片组 58 名患者中有 6 人(10%)通过 CT 扫描证实患有腹膜旁疝,而对照组 59 名患者中有 22 人(37%)通过 CT 扫描证实患有腹膜旁疝(差异为 27%;95% CI,12-41;P 结论及意义:在这项研究中,漏斗状腹膜旁网片可预防大量的腹膜旁疝气,且在 12 个月的随访期间不会导致患者出现网片或造口相关并发症。该研究结果表明,漏斗状网片是预防腹股沟旁疝的可行方案:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT03799939。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Parastomal Hernia Prevention Using Funnel-Shaped Intra-Abdominal Mesh Compared to No Mesh: The Chimney Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Prophylactic placement of a mesh has been suggested to prevent parastomal hernia. Evidence to support this practice is contradictory.

Objective: To determine whether funnel-shaped permanent synthetic parastomal mesh is effective and safe in parastomal hernia prevention.

Design, setting, and participants: The Chimney Trial was a randomized single-blinded multicenter trial conducted in 4 hospitals in Finland and 1 in Sweden from February 2019 and September 2021. Of 439 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing either laparoscopic or robotic-assisted abdominoperineal resection or the Hartmann procedure, 143 were enrolled in the trial, 135 received their allocated intervention, and 121 were analyzed at 12-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2023 to May 2024.

Intervention: In the intervention group, a permanent colostomy was created with a funnel-shaped intraperitoneal mesh and compared to a control group with a stoma without the mesh.

Main outcome and measure: The primary end point was the incidence of computed tomography (CT)-confirmed parastomal hernia 12 months after surgery.

Results: There were 68 patients (mean [SD] age, 68.7 [11.6] years; 36 [53% male and 32 [47%] female) who received the intended allocation in the mesh group and 67 (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [11.7] years; 48 [72%] male and 19 [28%] female) who received the intended allocation in the control group. CT scans were available for 58 patients in the mesh group and 59 patients in the control group at the 12-month follow-up. CT scans confirmed parastomal hernia in 6 of 58 patients (10%) in the mesh group compared to 22 of 59 patients (37%) in the control group (difference, 27%; 95% CI, 12-41; P < .001). Clinical parastomal hernia as a secondary outcome was recorded in 1 of 60 patients (2%) in the mesh group compared to 27 of 61 (43%) in the control group (difference, 41%; 95% CI, 29-55; P < .001). The number of patients with Clavien-Dindo class II ileus was 23 (35%) in the mesh group compared to 11 (17%) in the control group (difference, 18%; 95% CI, 3-32; P = .006). Only slight differences between the groups were detected in other stoma-related complications, readmissions, operative time, surgical site infections, reoperations, and quality of life.

Conclusions and relevance: In this study, funnel-shaped parastomal mesh prevented a significant number of parastomal hernias without predisposing patients to mesh- or stoma-related complications during 12-month follow-up. The results of this study suggest the funnel-shaped mesh is a feasible option to prevent parastomal hernia.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03799939.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA surgery
JAMA surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
400
期刊介绍: JAMA Surgery, an international peer-reviewed journal established in 1920, is the official publication of the Association of VA Surgeons, the Pacific Coast Surgical Association, and the Surgical Outcomes Club.It is a proud member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications.
期刊最新文献
Nationwide Implementation of Multimodal Prehabilitation and Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery. Functional Recovery After Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery. Enhancing Reality in the Multidisciplinary World. Activity and Physiological Stress Within 90 Days After Minimally Invasive and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Predefined Analysis of the DIPLOMA-2 Randomized Clinical Trial. Enhancing Reality in the Multidisciplinary World-Reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1