使用 imo(一种便携式头戴式周界仪)进行双眼周界筛查与 10-2 标准自动周界仪筛查具有中心视野缺陷的早期青光眼的相关性。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Glaucoma Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492
Euido Nishijima, Yoshinori Itoh, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Sachiyo Okude, Tadashi Nakano
{"title":"使用 imo(一种便携式头戴式周界仪)进行双眼周界筛查与 10-2 标准自动周界仪筛查具有中心视野缺陷的早期青光眼的相关性。","authors":"Euido Nishijima, Yoshinori Itoh, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Sachiyo Okude, Tadashi Nakano","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>The screening program using imo strongly correlates with 10-2 Standard automated perimetry in detecting central visual field defects in early glaucoma, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for efficient screening and severity quantification.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the correlation between abnormalities within the central 10° of the screening program using imo, a portable head-mounted perimeter, and 10-2 standard automated perimetry in early-stage glaucoma with central visual field defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included early glaucoma with (26 eyes) and without (38 eyes) central visual field defects. The correlation between the numbers of abnormal points within the central 10° of the imo screening program and those in the probability plot of 10-2, and mean total deviation and pattern deviation, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The imo screening program demonstrated sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98.7%) in detecting abnormalities, with a 91.6% agreement rate of 10-2. The mean number of anomalies in the 10-2 plot (pattern deviation) with P<1% was 0.85, 7.75, and 9.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.51, 5.38-10.1, and 6.89-12.5, respectively) for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively. The number of anomalies with P<1% was significantly higher when the imo screening program detected one anomaly versus none (P<0.01), and two versus one (P<0.05). Mean total deviation values were -1.15, -7.5, and -15.2 (95% confidence interval: -2.32 to 0.03, -11.21 to -3.78, and -19.7 to -10.6, respectively), while mean pattern deviation values were -1.57, -9.0, and -16.0 (95% confidence interval: -2.57 to -0.57, -12.5 to -5.49, and -21.4 to -10.7, respectively), for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects.\",\"authors\":\"Euido Nishijima, Yoshinori Itoh, Takahiko Noro, Shumpei Ogawa, Sachiyo Okude, Tadashi Nakano\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Prcis: </strong>The screening program using imo strongly correlates with 10-2 Standard automated perimetry in detecting central visual field defects in early glaucoma, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for efficient screening and severity quantification.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate the correlation between abnormalities within the central 10° of the screening program using imo, a portable head-mounted perimeter, and 10-2 standard automated perimetry in early-stage glaucoma with central visual field defects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included early glaucoma with (26 eyes) and without (38 eyes) central visual field defects. The correlation between the numbers of abnormal points within the central 10° of the imo screening program and those in the probability plot of 10-2, and mean total deviation and pattern deviation, were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The imo screening program demonstrated sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98.7%) in detecting abnormalities, with a 91.6% agreement rate of 10-2. The mean number of anomalies in the 10-2 plot (pattern deviation) with P<1% was 0.85, 7.75, and 9.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.51, 5.38-10.1, and 6.89-12.5, respectively) for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively. The number of anomalies with P<1% was significantly higher when the imo screening program detected one anomaly versus none (P<0.01), and two versus one (P<0.05). Mean total deviation values were -1.15, -7.5, and -15.2 (95% confidence interval: -2.32 to 0.03, -11.21 to -3.78, and -19.7 to -10.6, respectively), while mean pattern deviation values were -1.57, -9.0, and -16.0 (95% confidence interval: -2.57 to -0.57, -12.5 to -5.49, and -21.4 to -10.7, respectively), for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Glaucoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原理:在检测早期青光眼中心视野缺损方面,使用 imo 的筛查程序与 10-2 标准自动周边测量法有很强的相关性,突显了其作为高效筛查和严重程度量化的宝贵工具的潜力。目的:研究在有中心视野缺损的早期青光眼中,使用 imo(一种便携式头戴周边测量仪)的筛查程序与 10-2 标准自动周边测量法在中心 10° 范围内的异常之间的相关性:这项回顾性研究包括有(26 眼)和无(38 眼)中心视野缺损的早期青光眼。分析了 imo 筛查项目中心 10° 范围内异常点数量与 10-2 概率图中异常点数量之间的相关性,以及平均总偏差和模式偏差:在检测异常点方面,imo 筛查程序的灵敏度(80%)和特异度(98.7%)与 10-2 的吻合率为 91.6%。10-2 图中异常的平均数量(模式偏差)与 PC 结论一致:研究发现,在有中心视野缺陷的青光眼患者中,imo 便携式头戴周视仪与 10-2 标准自动周视仪具有相关性,并有可能缩短视野测试时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Correlation of Binocular Perimetry Screening using imo, a Portable Head Mounted Perimeter with 10-2 Standard Automated Perimetry for Early Glaucoma with Central Visual Field Defects.

Prcis: The screening program using imo strongly correlates with 10-2 Standard automated perimetry in detecting central visual field defects in early glaucoma, highlighting its potential as a valuable tool for efficient screening and severity quantification.

Purpose: To investigate the correlation between abnormalities within the central 10° of the screening program using imo, a portable head-mounted perimeter, and 10-2 standard automated perimetry in early-stage glaucoma with central visual field defects.

Methods: This retrospective study included early glaucoma with (26 eyes) and without (38 eyes) central visual field defects. The correlation between the numbers of abnormal points within the central 10° of the imo screening program and those in the probability plot of 10-2, and mean total deviation and pattern deviation, were analyzed.

Results: The imo screening program demonstrated sensitivity (80%) and specificity (98.7%) in detecting abnormalities, with a 91.6% agreement rate of 10-2. The mean number of anomalies in the 10-2 plot (pattern deviation) with P<1% was 0.85, 7.75, and 9.69 (95% confidence interval: 0.18-1.51, 5.38-10.1, and 6.89-12.5, respectively) for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively. The number of anomalies with P<1% was significantly higher when the imo screening program detected one anomaly versus none (P<0.01), and two versus one (P<0.05). Mean total deviation values were -1.15, -7.5, and -15.2 (95% confidence interval: -2.32 to 0.03, -11.21 to -3.78, and -19.7 to -10.6, respectively), while mean pattern deviation values were -1.57, -9.0, and -16.0 (95% confidence interval: -2.57 to -0.57, -12.5 to -5.49, and -21.4 to -10.7, respectively), for no, one, and two anomalies in the imo screening program, respectively.

Conclusions: The imo portable head-mounted perimeter was found to correlate with 10-2 standard automated perimetry in glaucoma patients with central visual field defects and has the potential to shorten visual field testing times.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Migraine and Open-Angle Glaucoma: A Twelve-Year Nationwide Retrospective Korean Cohort Study. Comparison of Elisar-Fast and Sita-Fast Strategy for Visual Field Assessment in Glaucoma. Outcomes of Trabeculectomy and Predictors of Success in Patients of African Ancestry with Primary Open Angle Glaucoma. Outcomes of a Second Ahmed Glaucoma Implant With Mitomycin-C in Pediatric Glaucoma After Initial Valve Failure. Outcomes of Phacoemulsification With or Without Kahook Dual Blade Goniotomy for Glaucoma Patients With Cataract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1