实体肿瘤患者血液感染耐多药细菌的流行及其影响:25 年趋势分析。

IF 3.7 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY Microbiology spectrum Pub Date : 2024-10-03 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1128/spectrum.02961-23
Carlos Lopera, Patricia Monzó, Tommaso Francesco Aiello, Mariana Chumbita, Olivier Peyrony, Antonio Gallardo-Pizarro, Cristina Pitart, Guillermo Cuervo, Laura Morata, Marta Bodro, Sabina Herrera, Ana Del Río, José Antonio Martínez, Alex Soriano, Pedro Puerta-Alcalde, Carolina Garcia-Vidal
{"title":"实体肿瘤患者血液感染耐多药细菌的流行及其影响:25 年趋势分析。","authors":"Carlos Lopera, Patricia Monzó, Tommaso Francesco Aiello, Mariana Chumbita, Olivier Peyrony, Antonio Gallardo-Pizarro, Cristina Pitart, Guillermo Cuervo, Laura Morata, Marta Bodro, Sabina Herrera, Ana Del Río, José Antonio Martínez, Alex Soriano, Pedro Puerta-Alcalde, Carolina Garcia-Vidal","doi":"10.1128/spectrum.02961-23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study aimed to describe the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among solid cancer (SC) patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment (IEAT) use and mortality trends over a 25-year period. All BSI occurrences in adult SC patients at a university hospital were analyzed across five distinct five-year intervals. MDR bacteria were classified as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and/or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) resistant to at least three antibiotic classes, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), and Vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococci</i>. A multivariate regression model identified the risk factors for MDR BSI. Of 6,117 BSI episodes, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) constituted 60.4% (3,695/6,117), being the most common are <i>Escherichia coli</i> with 26.8% (1,637/6,117), <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. with 12.4% (760/6,117), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with 8.6% (525/6,117). MDR-GNB accounted for 644 episodes (84.8% of MDR or 644/759), predominantly ESBL-producing strains (71.1% or 540/759), which escalated significantly over time. IEAT was administered in 24.8% of episodes, mainly in MDR BSI, and was associated with higher mortality (22.9% vs. 14%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Independent factors for MDR BSI were prior antibiotic use [odds ratio (OR) 2.93, confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.67], BSI during antibiotic treatment (OR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), biliary (OR 1.84, CI 1.34-2.52) or urinary source (OR 1.86, CI 1.43-2.43), admission period (OR) 1.28, CI 1.18-1.38, and community-acquired infection (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.82). The study showed an increase in MDR-GNB among SC patients with BSI. A quarter received IEAT, which was linked to increased mortality. Improving risk assessment for MDR infections and the judicious prescription of empiric antibiotics are crucial for better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a global public health threat as they are more challenging to treat, and they are on the rise. Solid cancer patients are often immunocompromised due to their disease and cancer treatments, making them more susceptible to infections. Understanding the changes and trends in bloodstream infections in solid cancer patients is crucial, to help physicians make informed decisions about appropriate antibiotic therapies, manage infections in this vulnerable population, and prevent infection. Solid cancer patients often require intensive and prolonged treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Infections can complicate these treatments, leading to treatment delays, increased healthcare costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Investigating new strategies to combat MDR infections and researching novel antibiotics in these patients is of paramount importance to avoid these negative impacts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18670,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology spectrum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in solid cancer patients with bloodstream infection: a 25-year trend analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Lopera, Patricia Monzó, Tommaso Francesco Aiello, Mariana Chumbita, Olivier Peyrony, Antonio Gallardo-Pizarro, Cristina Pitart, Guillermo Cuervo, Laura Morata, Marta Bodro, Sabina Herrera, Ana Del Río, José Antonio Martínez, Alex Soriano, Pedro Puerta-Alcalde, Carolina Garcia-Vidal\",\"doi\":\"10.1128/spectrum.02961-23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study aimed to describe the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among solid cancer (SC) patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment (IEAT) use and mortality trends over a 25-year period. All BSI occurrences in adult SC patients at a university hospital were analyzed across five distinct five-year intervals. MDR bacteria were classified as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and/or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) resistant to at least three antibiotic classes, methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA), and Vancomycin-resistant <i>Enterococci</i>. A multivariate regression model identified the risk factors for MDR BSI. Of 6,117 BSI episodes, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) constituted 60.4% (3,695/6,117), being the most common are <i>Escherichia coli</i> with 26.8% (1,637/6,117), <i>Klebsiella</i> spp. with 12.4% (760/6,117), and <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> with 8.6% (525/6,117). MDR-GNB accounted for 644 episodes (84.8% of MDR or 644/759), predominantly ESBL-producing strains (71.1% or 540/759), which escalated significantly over time. IEAT was administered in 24.8% of episodes, mainly in MDR BSI, and was associated with higher mortality (22.9% vs. 14%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Independent factors for MDR BSI were prior antibiotic use [odds ratio (OR) 2.93, confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.67], BSI during antibiotic treatment (OR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), biliary (OR 1.84, CI 1.34-2.52) or urinary source (OR 1.86, CI 1.43-2.43), admission period (OR) 1.28, CI 1.18-1.38, and community-acquired infection (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.82). The study showed an increase in MDR-GNB among SC patients with BSI. A quarter received IEAT, which was linked to increased mortality. Improving risk assessment for MDR infections and the judicious prescription of empiric antibiotics are crucial for better outcomes.</p><p><strong>Importance: </strong>Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a global public health threat as they are more challenging to treat, and they are on the rise. Solid cancer patients are often immunocompromised due to their disease and cancer treatments, making them more susceptible to infections. Understanding the changes and trends in bloodstream infections in solid cancer patients is crucial, to help physicians make informed decisions about appropriate antibiotic therapies, manage infections in this vulnerable population, and prevent infection. Solid cancer patients often require intensive and prolonged treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Infections can complicate these treatments, leading to treatment delays, increased healthcare costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Investigating new strategies to combat MDR infections and researching novel antibiotics in these patients is of paramount importance to avoid these negative impacts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11448387/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology spectrum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02961-23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1128/spectrum.02961-23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究旨在描述实体肿瘤(SC)患者血流感染(BSI)中耐多药(MDR)细菌的流行病学,评估25年来不恰当经验性抗生素治疗(IEAT)的使用情况和死亡率趋势。对一家大学医院成年 SC 患者在五个不同的五年间发生的所有 BSI 事件进行了分析。MDR 细菌分为产扩谱β-内酰胺酶 (ESBL) 和/或耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌、对至少三种抗生素耐药的非发酵革兰氏阴性杆菌 (GNB)、耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌 (MRSA) 和耐万古霉素肠球菌。多变量回归模型确定了 MDR BSI 的风险因素。在 6,117 例 BSI 中,革兰氏阴性杆菌(GNB)占 60.4%(3,695/6,117),其中最常见的是大肠埃希菌,占 26.8%(1,637/6,117),克雷伯菌属占 12.4%(760/6,117),铜绿假单胞菌占 8.6%(525/6,117)。MDR-GNB占644例(占MDR的84.8%,即644/759),主要是产ESBL的菌株(71.1%,即540/759),随着时间的推移其数量显著增加。24.8%的病例使用了IEAT,主要是在MDR BSI中,且死亡率较高(22.9% vs. 14%,P < 0.001)。MDR BSI的独立因素包括:之前使用过抗生素[几率比(OR)2.93,置信区间(CI)2.34-3.67]、抗生素治疗期间的BSI(OR 1.46,CI 1.18-1.81)、胆源(OR 1.84,CI 1.34-2.52)或尿源(OR 1.86,CI 1.43-2.43)、入院时间(OR)1.28,CI 1.18-1.38,以及社区获得性感染(OR 0.57,CI 0.39-0.82)。研究显示,BSI 的 SC 患者中 MDR-GNB 增加。四分之一的患者接受了 IEAT,这与死亡率增加有关。改进 MDR 感染的风险评估和经验性抗生素的合理处方对改善疗效至关重要:耐多药(MDR)细菌对全球公共卫生构成威胁,因为它们更难治疗,而且呈上升趋势。实体瘤患者往往因疾病和癌症治疗而免疫力低下,因此更容易受到感染。了解实体肿瘤患者血流感染的变化和趋势至关重要,这有助于医生就适当的抗生素疗法做出明智的决定,管理这一易感人群的感染并预防感染。实体瘤患者通常需要长时间的强化治疗,包括手术、化疗和放疗。感染会使这些治疗复杂化,导致治疗延误、医疗成本增加和患者预后较差。为避免这些负面影响,研究抗耐药菌感染的新策略和新型抗生素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Prevalence and impact of multidrug-resistant bacteria in solid cancer patients with bloodstream infection: a 25-year trend analysis.

The study aimed to describe the epidemiology of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria among solid cancer (SC) patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating inappropriate empiric antibiotic treatment (IEAT) use and mortality trends over a 25-year period. All BSI occurrences in adult SC patients at a university hospital were analyzed across five distinct five-year intervals. MDR bacteria were classified as extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL)-producing and/or Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) resistant to at least three antibiotic classes, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci. A multivariate regression model identified the risk factors for MDR BSI. Of 6,117 BSI episodes, Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) constituted 60.4% (3,695/6,117), being the most common are Escherichia coli with 26.8% (1,637/6,117), Klebsiella spp. with 12.4% (760/6,117), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with 8.6% (525/6,117). MDR-GNB accounted for 644 episodes (84.8% of MDR or 644/759), predominantly ESBL-producing strains (71.1% or 540/759), which escalated significantly over time. IEAT was administered in 24.8% of episodes, mainly in MDR BSI, and was associated with higher mortality (22.9% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). Independent factors for MDR BSI were prior antibiotic use [odds ratio (OR) 2.93, confidence interval (CI) 2.34-3.67], BSI during antibiotic treatment (OR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), biliary (OR 1.84, CI 1.34-2.52) or urinary source (OR 1.86, CI 1.43-2.43), admission period (OR) 1.28, CI 1.18-1.38, and community-acquired infection (OR 0.57, CI 0.39-0.82). The study showed an increase in MDR-GNB among SC patients with BSI. A quarter received IEAT, which was linked to increased mortality. Improving risk assessment for MDR infections and the judicious prescription of empiric antibiotics are crucial for better outcomes.

Importance: Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria pose a global public health threat as they are more challenging to treat, and they are on the rise. Solid cancer patients are often immunocompromised due to their disease and cancer treatments, making them more susceptible to infections. Understanding the changes and trends in bloodstream infections in solid cancer patients is crucial, to help physicians make informed decisions about appropriate antibiotic therapies, manage infections in this vulnerable population, and prevent infection. Solid cancer patients often require intensive and prolonged treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Infections can complicate these treatments, leading to treatment delays, increased healthcare costs, and poorer patient outcomes. Investigating new strategies to combat MDR infections and researching novel antibiotics in these patients is of paramount importance to avoid these negative impacts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Microbiology spectrum
Microbiology spectrum Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Genetics
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
1800
期刊介绍: Microbiology Spectrum publishes commissioned review articles on topics in microbiology representing ten content areas: Archaea; Food Microbiology; Bacterial Genetics, Cell Biology, and Physiology; Clinical Microbiology; Environmental Microbiology and Ecology; Eukaryotic Microbes; Genomics, Computational, and Synthetic Microbiology; Immunology; Pathogenesis; and Virology. Reviews are interrelated, with each review linking to other related content. A large board of Microbiology Spectrum editors aids in the development of topics for potential reviews and in the identification of an editor, or editors, who shepherd each collection.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of a microfluidic-based point-of-care prototype with customized chip for detection of bacterial clusters. A bacteriophage cocktail targeting Yersinia pestis provides strong post-exposure protection in a rat pneumonic plague model. A drug repurposing screen identifies decitabine as an HSV-1 antiviral. An integrated strain-level analytic pipeline utilizing longitudinal metagenomic data. Analysis of the gut microbiota and fecal metabolites in people living with HIV.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1