高流量鼻腔和口腔充氧对张口呼吸儿童安全呼吸暂停时间的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/pan.14982
Sang-Hwan Ji, Jung-Bin Park, Pyoyoon Kang, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Jin-Tae Kim
{"title":"高流量鼻腔和口腔充氧对张口呼吸儿童安全呼吸暂停时间的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Sang-Hwan Ji, Jung-Bin Park, Pyoyoon Kang, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Jin-Tae Kim","doi":"10.1111/pan.14982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients, aged 0-10 years were randomly allocated to either the high-flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as \"success\" in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as \"failure\" and rescue ventilation was given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high-flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end-tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high-flow nasal oxygenation is not available.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"1154-1161"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of high-flow nasal and buccal oxygenation on safe apnea time in children with open mouth: A randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sang-Hwan Ji, Jung-Bin Park, Pyoyoon Kang, Young-Eun Jang, Eun-Hee Kim, Ji-Hyun Lee, Hee-Soo Kim, Jin-Tae Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/pan.14982\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-eight patients, aged 0-10 years were randomly allocated to either the high-flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min<sup>-1</sup>·kg<sup>-1</sup> of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as \\\"success\\\" in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as \\\"failure\\\" and rescue ventilation was given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high-flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end-tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high-flow nasal oxygenation is not available.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1154-1161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14982\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:据报道,高流量鼻腔吸氧可延长呼吸暂停的持续时间,同时在闭口状态下保持足够的氧饱和度。此外,颊吸氧对肥胖成人也有类似效果。我们比较了这两种方法对延长儿童患者张口时可接受的呼吸暂停时间的影响:38 名 0-10 岁的患者被随机分配到高流量鼻腔吸氧组(17 人)或口腔吸氧组(21 人)。在进行包括神经肌肉阻滞在内的麻醉诱导后,开始手动通气,直到呼气氧浓度达到 90%。随后,暂停通气,患者头部伸展,张开嘴巴。HFNO 组接受 2 L-min-1-kg-1 氧气,BO 组接受 0.5 L-min-1-kg-1 氧气。我们根据以往的文献设定了目标呼吸暂停时间。当呼吸暂停时间达到目标时,我们将该病例定义为延长安全呼吸暂停时间 "成功",并恢复通气。当脉搏血氧饱和度在目标呼吸暂停时间前下降到 92% 时,我们将其记录为 "失败",并进行抢救性通气:结果:高流量鼻腔吸氧组安全延长呼吸暂停时间的成功率为 100%,而口腔吸氧组为 76%(P = .04)。氧储备指数、潮气末或经皮二氧化碳分压以及脉搏氧饱和度在各组之间没有差异:结论:高流量鼻腔吸氧能有效维持呼吸暂停期间适当的动脉血氧饱和度,即使儿童张开嘴巴也是如此,而且效果优于口腔吸氧。当无法使用高流量鼻腔吸氧时,口腔吸氧可能是一个很好的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of high-flow nasal and buccal oxygenation on safe apnea time in children with open mouth: A randomized controlled trial.

Background: High-flow nasal oxygenation is reported to prolong duration of apnea while maintaining adequate oxygen saturation with the mouth closed. Also, buccal oxygenation is known to have similar effects in obese adults. We compared the effect of these two methods on prolongation of acceptable apnea time in pediatric patients with their mouth open.

Methods: Thirty-eight patients, aged 0-10 years were randomly allocated to either the high-flow nasal oxygenation group (n = 17) or the buccal oxygenation group (n = 21). After induction of anesthesia including neuromuscular blockade, manual ventilation was initiated until the expiratory oxygen concentration reached 90%. Subsequently, ventilation was paused, and the patient's head was extended, and mouth was opened. The HFNO group received 2 L·min-1·kg-1 of oxygen, and the BO group received 0.5 L·min-1·kg-1 of oxygen. We set a target apnea time according to previous literature. When the apnea time reached the target, we defined the case as "success" in prolongation of safe apnea time and resumed ventilation. When the pulse oximetry decreased to 92% before the target apnea time, it was recorded as "failure" and rescue ventilation was given.

Results: The success rate of safe apnea prolongation was 100% in the high-flow nasal oxygenation group compared to 76% in the buccal oxygenation group (p = .04). Oxygen reserve index, end-tidal or transcutaneous carbon dioxide partial pressure, and pulse oximetry did not differ between groups.

Conclusion: High-flow nasal oxygenation is effective in maintaining appropriate arterial oxygen saturation during apnea even in children with their mouth open and is superior to buccal oxygenation. Buccal oxygenation may be a good alternative when high-flow nasal oxygenation is not available.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Feasibility of bispectral index monitoring during pediatric critical care transport. Ball valve gas trapping in pediatric one-lung ventilation: Not all ventilation is loss of isolation. Severe knotting guidewire after central venous catheterization. Evaluation of propofol-based procedural sedation in pediatric hemato-oncological patients provided by physician assistants in anesthesia. Perioperative intravenous lignocaine for pediatric postoperative pain-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1