评估妇女履行孕产权利情况的心理测量可靠性。

Claudia Susana Silva-Fernández, María de la Calle, Paul Anthony Camacho, Silvia M Arribas, Eva Garrosa, David Ramiro-Cortijo
{"title":"评估妇女履行孕产权利情况的心理测量可靠性。","authors":"Claudia Susana Silva-Fernández, María de la Calle, Paul Anthony Camacho, Silvia M Arribas, Eva Garrosa, David Ramiro-Cortijo","doi":"10.3390/ejihpe14080150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The fulfillment of rights to maternal healthcare is a key factor for the wellbeing of women. However, there is a lack of an instrument to ascertain the experience of women during maternity to enable adequate monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate a new instrument to measure women's perception of the fulfillment of rights during healthcare in pregnancy and childbirth and immediately postpartum. The initial version of the instrument consists of 50 items and was validated using exploratory factor analysis. Additionally, the final version of the instrument consists of 29 items and was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and known-group validity. The instrument was applied to 185 Spanish women. The global Aiken's V of the initial instrument proposal was 0.89. The process resulted in an instrument with five factors (information, privacy, consent, support, and participation) that explained the 60% of the total variance. The score of the instrument was correlated with resilience, maternity beliefs, and positive and negative affect. External validation showed relations with age, gravida, and the number of times a woman has been in labor. Additionally, the Cronbach's α reliability was 0.93 [0.91; 0.94]. In conclusion, the instrument developed is consistent and has appropriate psychometric properties for assessing the fulfillment rights of maternity healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":30631,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","volume":"14 8","pages":"2248-2261"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353840/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric Reliability to Assess the Perception of Women's Fulfillment of Maternity Rights.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia Susana Silva-Fernández, María de la Calle, Paul Anthony Camacho, Silvia M Arribas, Eva Garrosa, David Ramiro-Cortijo\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ejihpe14080150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The fulfillment of rights to maternal healthcare is a key factor for the wellbeing of women. However, there is a lack of an instrument to ascertain the experience of women during maternity to enable adequate monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate a new instrument to measure women's perception of the fulfillment of rights during healthcare in pregnancy and childbirth and immediately postpartum. The initial version of the instrument consists of 50 items and was validated using exploratory factor analysis. Additionally, the final version of the instrument consists of 29 items and was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and known-group validity. The instrument was applied to 185 Spanish women. The global Aiken's V of the initial instrument proposal was 0.89. The process resulted in an instrument with five factors (information, privacy, consent, support, and participation) that explained the 60% of the total variance. The score of the instrument was correlated with resilience, maternity beliefs, and positive and negative affect. External validation showed relations with age, gravida, and the number of times a woman has been in labor. Additionally, the Cronbach's α reliability was 0.93 [0.91; 0.94]. In conclusion, the instrument developed is consistent and has appropriate psychometric properties for assessing the fulfillment rights of maternity healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":30631,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"volume\":\"14 8\",\"pages\":\"2248-2261\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11353840/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14080150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

实现孕产妇保健权利是妇女福祉的一个关键因素。然而,目前还缺乏一种工具来确定妇女在孕产期的经历,以便进行适当的监测。本研究的目的是验证一种新的工具,以测量妇女对孕产期和产后即时医疗保健权利履行情况的看法。该工具的初始版本包括 50 个项目,并通过探索性因素分析进行了验证。此外,该工具的最终版本由 29 个项目组成,并通过确认性因子分析和已知群体有效性进行了验证。该工具适用于 185 名西班牙女性。初始工具提案的总体艾肯 V 值为 0.89。该工具包含五个因子(信息、隐私、同意、支持和参与),解释了总方差的 60%。该工具的得分与复原力、孕产信念、积极和消极情绪相关。外部验证显示,该工具与产妇的年龄、孕产妇和分娩次数有关。此外,Cronbach's α 信度为 0.93 [0.91; 0.94]。总之,所开发的工具具有一致性和适当的心理测量特性,可用于评估孕产妇医疗保健权利的实现情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Psychometric Reliability to Assess the Perception of Women's Fulfillment of Maternity Rights.

The fulfillment of rights to maternal healthcare is a key factor for the wellbeing of women. However, there is a lack of an instrument to ascertain the experience of women during maternity to enable adequate monitoring. The aim of this study was to validate a new instrument to measure women's perception of the fulfillment of rights during healthcare in pregnancy and childbirth and immediately postpartum. The initial version of the instrument consists of 50 items and was validated using exploratory factor analysis. Additionally, the final version of the instrument consists of 29 items and was validated by confirmatory factor analysis and known-group validity. The instrument was applied to 185 Spanish women. The global Aiken's V of the initial instrument proposal was 0.89. The process resulted in an instrument with five factors (information, privacy, consent, support, and participation) that explained the 60% of the total variance. The score of the instrument was correlated with resilience, maternity beliefs, and positive and negative affect. External validation showed relations with age, gravida, and the number of times a woman has been in labor. Additionally, the Cronbach's α reliability was 0.93 [0.91; 0.94]. In conclusion, the instrument developed is consistent and has appropriate psychometric properties for assessing the fulfillment rights of maternity healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Factor Structure and Validity of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21. Addressing the Sense of School Belonging Among All Students? A Systematic Literature Review. Bivalent Fears of Evaluation in Social Anxiety: Evaluation of an Extended Psychoevolutionary Model. Parental Burnout-A Model of Risk Factors and Protective Resources Among Mothers of Children with/Without Special Needs. Analysis of Gender Issues in Computational Thinking Approach in Science and Mathematics Learning in Higher Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1