{"title":"[急性髓细胞性白血病化疗期间不同时间点的流式细胞计数 MRD 检测对预后的影响]","authors":"Rui-Xue Ju, Feng-Qiang Sun, Yu-Hui Wang","doi":"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.04.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) detection at different time points during AML chemotherapy on prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>130 adult primary AML patients diagnosed and standardized with chemotherapy from March 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, MRD was detected by flow cytometry, Kaplan-Meier curves was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was used for variance analysis, and univariate and multifactor influencing patient survival with COX proportional risk regression model analysis. Cumulative incidence rate (CIR) analysis with competing risk model and variance analysis using Fine-Gray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 81 CR1, 26 CR2, 14 PR, and 9 NR patients in 130 patients. OS of the CR1 group was higher than that in the CR2, PR,and NR groups. OS of the CR2 group was higher than that in the PR group, but there was no statistically difference compared to the NR group. There was no statistically difference in OS between the PR and NR groups. 107 patients in CR1 and CR2 were grouped according to MRD detected by flow cytometry, and after the first induction chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD<sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 65.3% and 27.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 58.7% and 41.4% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 34.7% and 69.7% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=6.639, <i>P</i> =0.010; χ<sup>2</sup>=6.131, <i>P</i> =0.013 and χ<sup>2</sup>=6.637, <i>P</i> =0.010). After the second chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD<sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 50.8% and 37.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 49.2% and 44.5% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 49.2% and 59.5% respectively, with no statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=1.475, <i>P</i> =0.225; χ<sup>2</sup>=2.432, <i>P</i> =0.119 and χ<sup>2</sup>=1.416, <i>P</i> =0.234). During consolidation therapy, for patients in the MRD <sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 51.9% and 29.6% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 67.5% and 24.6% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 48.1% and 70.4% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=20.982, <i>P</i> < 0.001; χ<sup>2</sup>=17.794, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and χ<sup>2</sup>=19.879, <i>P</i> < 0.001). For patients with MRD<sup>-</sup> at all three time points and positive at either time point, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 69.9% and 33.3% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 59.1% and 44.7% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 30.1% and 65.1% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=7.367, <i>P</i> =0.007; χ<sup>2</sup>=6.042, <i>P</i> =0.014 and χ<sup>2</sup>=7.662, <i>P</i> =0.006). Univariate analysis showed that karyotype at high risk of chromosome was an unfavorable factor affecting patients' RFS and OS, while 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy achieved CR, MRD<sup>-</sup> after the first induction chemotherapy and MRD<sup>-</sup> after the second induction chemotherapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and OS. MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy and MRD<sup>-</sup> at all three time points were all protective factors affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR. Multivariate analysis showed that induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles achieved CR was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and CIR, and MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early achievement of CR and MRD<sup>-</sup> in adult AML patients, especially MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy, is a marker of good prognosis, and flow cytometry is the most commonly used method for MRD detection in AML patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":35777,"journal":{"name":"中国实验血液学杂志","volume":"32 4","pages":"1051-1057"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Effect of Flow Cytometric MRD Detection at Different Time Points during AML Chemotherapy on Prognosis].\",\"authors\":\"Rui-Xue Ju, Feng-Qiang Sun, Yu-Hui Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.04.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) detection at different time points during AML chemotherapy on prognosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>130 adult primary AML patients diagnosed and standardized with chemotherapy from March 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, MRD was detected by flow cytometry, Kaplan-Meier curves was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was used for variance analysis, and univariate and multifactor influencing patient survival with COX proportional risk regression model analysis. Cumulative incidence rate (CIR) analysis with competing risk model and variance analysis using Fine-Gray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 81 CR1, 26 CR2, 14 PR, and 9 NR patients in 130 patients. OS of the CR1 group was higher than that in the CR2, PR,and NR groups. OS of the CR2 group was higher than that in the PR group, but there was no statistically difference compared to the NR group. There was no statistically difference in OS between the PR and NR groups. 107 patients in CR1 and CR2 were grouped according to MRD detected by flow cytometry, and after the first induction chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD<sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 65.3% and 27.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 58.7% and 41.4% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 34.7% and 69.7% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=6.639, <i>P</i> =0.010; χ<sup>2</sup>=6.131, <i>P</i> =0.013 and χ<sup>2</sup>=6.637, <i>P</i> =0.010). After the second chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD<sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 50.8% and 37.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 49.2% and 44.5% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 49.2% and 59.5% respectively, with no statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=1.475, <i>P</i> =0.225; χ<sup>2</sup>=2.432, <i>P</i> =0.119 and χ<sup>2</sup>=1.416, <i>P</i> =0.234). During consolidation therapy, for patients in the MRD <sup>-</sup> and MRD<sup>+</sup> groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 51.9% and 29.6% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 67.5% and 24.6% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 48.1% and 70.4% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=20.982, <i>P</i> < 0.001; χ<sup>2</sup>=17.794, <i>P</i> < 0.001 and χ<sup>2</sup>=19.879, <i>P</i> < 0.001). For patients with MRD<sup>-</sup> at all three time points and positive at either time point, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 69.9% and 33.3% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 59.1% and 44.7% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 30.1% and 65.1% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ<sup>2</sup>=7.367, <i>P</i> =0.007; χ<sup>2</sup>=6.042, <i>P</i> =0.014 and χ<sup>2</sup>=7.662, <i>P</i> =0.006). Univariate analysis showed that karyotype at high risk of chromosome was an unfavorable factor affecting patients' RFS and OS, while 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy achieved CR, MRD<sup>-</sup> after the first induction chemotherapy and MRD<sup>-</sup> after the second induction chemotherapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and OS. MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy and MRD<sup>-</sup> at all three time points were all protective factors affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR. Multivariate analysis showed that induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles achieved CR was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and CIR, and MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Early achievement of CR and MRD<sup>-</sup> in adult AML patients, especially MRD<sup>-</sup> during consolidation therapy, is a marker of good prognosis, and flow cytometry is the most commonly used method for MRD detection in AML patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"volume\":\"32 4\",\"pages\":\"1051-1057\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中国实验血液学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.04.012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国实验血液学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19746/j.cnki.issn.1009-2137.2024.04.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的方法:回顾性分析2018年3月至2022年3月确诊并规范化化疗的130例成人原发性AML患者,采用流式细胞术检测MRD,采用Kaplan-Meier曲线进行生存分析,采用log-rank检验进行方差分析,采用COX比例风险回归模型分析影响患者生存的单因素和多因素。使用竞争风险模型进行累积发病率(CIR)分析,并使用Fine-Gray进行方差分析:130名患者中有81名CR1、26名CR2、14名PR和9名NR患者。CR1 组的 OS 高于 CR2、PR 和 NR 组。CR2 组的 OS 高于 PR 组,但与 NR 组相比没有统计学差异。PR 组和 NR 组的 OS 在统计学上没有差异。107 例 CR1 和 CR2 患者根据流式细胞术检测到的 MRD 进行分组,首次诱导化疗后,MRD- 组和 MRD+ 组患者的 4 年预期 RFS 率分别为 65.3% 和 27.9%,4年预期OS率分别为58.7%和41.4%,4年预期CIR分别为34.7%和69.7%,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=6.639,P=0.010;χ2=6.131,P=0.013和χ2=6.637,P=0.010)。第二次化疗后,MRD-组和MRD+组患者的4年预期RFS率分别为50.8%和37.9%,4年预期OS率分别为49.2%和44.5%,4年预期CIR分别为49.2%和59.5%,两组间差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.475,P=0.225;χ2=2.432,P=0.119;χ2=1.416,P=0.234)。在巩固治疗期间,MRD-组和MRD+组患者的4年预期RFS率分别为51.9%和29.6%,4年预期OS率分别为67.5%和24.6%,4年预期CIR分别为48.1%和70.4%,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=20.982,P<0.001;χ2=17.794,P<0.001和χ2=19.879,P<0.001)。对于三个时间点均为MRD-和任一时间点均为阳性的患者,4年预期RFS率分别为69.9%和33.3%,4年预期OS率分别为59.1%和44.7%,4年预期CIR分别为30.1%和65.1%,两组间差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.367,P=0.007;χ2=6.042,P=0.014和χ2=7.662,P=0.006)。单变量分析显示,染色体高危核型是影响患者RFS和OS的不利因素,而诱导化疗2个周期达到CR、第一次诱导化疗后MRD-和第二次诱导化疗后MRD-是影响患者RFS和OS的保护因素。巩固治疗期间的MRD-和所有三个时间点的MRD-都是影响患者RFS、OS和CIR的保护因素。多变量分析显示,诱导化疗2个周期达到CR是影响患者RFS和CIR的保护因素,而巩固治疗期间的MRD-是影响患者RFS、OS和CIR的保护因素:结论:成人急性髓细胞白血病患者早期达到CR和MRD-,尤其是巩固治疗期间的MRD-,是预后良好的标志,而流式细胞术是急性髓细胞白血病患者MRD检测的最常用方法。
[Effect of Flow Cytometric MRD Detection at Different Time Points during AML Chemotherapy on Prognosis].
Objective: To investigate the effect of flow cytometric minimal residual disease (MRD) detection at different time points during AML chemotherapy on prognosis.
Methods: 130 adult primary AML patients diagnosed and standardized with chemotherapy from March 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed, MRD was detected by flow cytometry, Kaplan-Meier curves was used for survival analysis and log-rank test was used for variance analysis, and univariate and multifactor influencing patient survival with COX proportional risk regression model analysis. Cumulative incidence rate (CIR) analysis with competing risk model and variance analysis using Fine-Gray.
Results: There were 81 CR1, 26 CR2, 14 PR, and 9 NR patients in 130 patients. OS of the CR1 group was higher than that in the CR2, PR,and NR groups. OS of the CR2 group was higher than that in the PR group, but there was no statistically difference compared to the NR group. There was no statistically difference in OS between the PR and NR groups. 107 patients in CR1 and CR2 were grouped according to MRD detected by flow cytometry, and after the first induction chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD- and MRD+ groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 65.3% and 27.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 58.7% and 41.4% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 34.7% and 69.7% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ2=6.639, P =0.010; χ2=6.131, P =0.013 and χ2=6.637, P =0.010). After the second chemotherapy, for patients in the MRD- and MRD+ groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 50.8% and 37.9% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 49.2% and 44.5% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 49.2% and 59.5% respectively, with no statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ2=1.475, P =0.225; χ2=2.432, P =0.119 and χ2=1.416, P =0.234). During consolidation therapy, for patients in the MRD - and MRD+ groups, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 51.9% and 29.6% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 67.5% and 24.6% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 48.1% and 70.4% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ2=20.982, P < 0.001; χ2=17.794, P < 0.001 and χ2=19.879, P < 0.001). For patients with MRD- at all three time points and positive at either time point, the 4-year expected RFS rates were 69.9% and 33.3% respectively, the 4-year expected OS rates were 59.1% and 44.7% respectively, and the 4-year expected CIR were 30.1% and 65.1% respectively, with statistically significant differences between 2 groups (χ2=7.367, P =0.007; χ2=6.042, P =0.014 and χ2=7.662, P =0.006). Univariate analysis showed that karyotype at high risk of chromosome was an unfavorable factor affecting patients' RFS and OS, while 2 cycles of induction chemotherapy achieved CR, MRD- after the first induction chemotherapy and MRD- after the second induction chemotherapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and OS. MRD- during consolidation therapy and MRD- at all three time points were all protective factors affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR. Multivariate analysis showed that induction chemotherapy for 2 cycles achieved CR was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS and CIR, and MRD- during consolidation therapy was a protective factor affecting patients' RFS, OS and CIR.
Conclusion: Early achievement of CR and MRD- in adult AML patients, especially MRD- during consolidation therapy, is a marker of good prognosis, and flow cytometry is the most commonly used method for MRD detection in AML patients.