初级保健提供者对多癌症早期检测小组的看法。

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2024-08-23 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771
Benjamin E Ueberroth, Richard J Presutti, Alyssa McGary, Mitesh J Borad, Neera Agrwal
{"title":"初级保健提供者对多癌症早期检测小组的看法。","authors":"Benjamin E Ueberroth, Richard J Presutti, Alyssa McGary, Mitesh J Borad, Neera Agrwal","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multicancer early detection panels have recently become available to patients with healthcare provider prescriptions and available funds. These tests utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to screen more than 50 cancers using a single blood sample. However, perspectives and data on how the deployment of these tests may impact the practices of primary care providers in terms of implementation, interpretation, documentation, and costs are limited. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of primary care providers regarding the integration of multicancer early detection panels into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a survey to assess the opinions and perspectives of primary care providers, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, across a multistate, tertiary healthcare system. We used a single form consisting of novel questions on familiarity with multi-cancer early detection panels, cost, healthcare equity, documentation, medicolegal, and other concerns. The subgroup analysis was consistent with stratification based on familiarity with ctDNA-based tests and their roles in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were unfamiliar with multicancer early detection panels and had not used ctDNA-based tests. Most primary care providers suggested that they would reorder multicancer early detection panel testing at 1- to 5-year intervals and prefer subspecialists for both ordering multicancer early detection panels as well as interpreting their results. Relative concerns differed between physicians and nonphysicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of multicancer early detection panels into primary care practice requires careful planning and consideration for the management of increased clinical load, interpretation of results, and cost management.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":"22 ","pages":"eAO0771"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perspectives of primary care providers regarding multicancer early detection panels.\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin E Ueberroth, Richard J Presutti, Alyssa McGary, Mitesh J Borad, Neera Agrwal\",\"doi\":\"10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Multicancer early detection panels have recently become available to patients with healthcare provider prescriptions and available funds. These tests utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to screen more than 50 cancers using a single blood sample. However, perspectives and data on how the deployment of these tests may impact the practices of primary care providers in terms of implementation, interpretation, documentation, and costs are limited. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of primary care providers regarding the integration of multicancer early detection panels into clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a survey to assess the opinions and perspectives of primary care providers, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, across a multistate, tertiary healthcare system. We used a single form consisting of novel questions on familiarity with multi-cancer early detection panels, cost, healthcare equity, documentation, medicolegal, and other concerns. The subgroup analysis was consistent with stratification based on familiarity with ctDNA-based tests and their roles in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were unfamiliar with multicancer early detection panels and had not used ctDNA-based tests. Most primary care providers suggested that they would reorder multicancer early detection panel testing at 1- to 5-year intervals and prefer subspecialists for both ordering multicancer early detection panels as well as interpreting their results. Relative concerns differed between physicians and nonphysicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of multicancer early detection panels into primary care practice requires careful planning and consideration for the management of increased clinical load, interpretation of results, and cost management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47359,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"eAO0771\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11323832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Einstein-Sao Paulo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2024AO0771","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:最近,只要有医疗机构的处方和可用资金,患者就可以获得多种癌症早期检测面板。这些检测利用循环肿瘤 DNA(ctDNA),通过单份血液样本筛查 50 多种癌症。然而,关于这些检测的应用会在实施、解释、记录和成本方面对初级保健提供者的实践产生何种影响的观点和数据却很有限。本研究旨在评估初级医疗服务提供者对将多癌症早期检测面板纳入临床实践的看法:方法:我们通过一项调查来评估一个多州三级医疗保健系统中初级医疗服务提供者(包括医生、执业护士和医生助理)的意见和观点。我们使用了一份单一的表格,其中包含一些新颖的问题,涉及对多种癌症早期检测面板的熟悉程度、成本、医疗保健公平性、文件记录、医疗法律及其他问题。亚组分析根据对基于ctDNA的检测及其在临床实践中的作用的熟悉程度进行了分层:结果:大多数受访者对多癌症早期检测面板并不熟悉,也未使用过基于 ctDNA 的检测。大多数初级保健提供者表示,他们会每隔 1 到 5 年重新订购多癌早期检测样本,并倾向于由亚专科医生订购多癌早期检测样本和解释检测结果。医生和非医生的相对关注点有所不同:结论:将多癌基因早期检测整合到初级保健实践中需要仔细规划,并考虑如何处理增加的临床负荷、结果解释和成本管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Perspectives of primary care providers regarding multicancer early detection panels.

Objective: Multicancer early detection panels have recently become available to patients with healthcare provider prescriptions and available funds. These tests utilize circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to screen more than 50 cancers using a single blood sample. However, perspectives and data on how the deployment of these tests may impact the practices of primary care providers in terms of implementation, interpretation, documentation, and costs are limited. This study aimed to assess the perspectives of primary care providers regarding the integration of multicancer early detection panels into clinical practice.

Methods: We used a survey to assess the opinions and perspectives of primary care providers, including physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants, across a multistate, tertiary healthcare system. We used a single form consisting of novel questions on familiarity with multi-cancer early detection panels, cost, healthcare equity, documentation, medicolegal, and other concerns. The subgroup analysis was consistent with stratification based on familiarity with ctDNA-based tests and their roles in clinical practice.

Results: Most respondents were unfamiliar with multicancer early detection panels and had not used ctDNA-based tests. Most primary care providers suggested that they would reorder multicancer early detection panel testing at 1- to 5-year intervals and prefer subspecialists for both ordering multicancer early detection panels as well as interpreting their results. Relative concerns differed between physicians and nonphysicians.

Conclusion: The integration of multicancer early detection panels into primary care practice requires careful planning and consideration for the management of increased clinical load, interpretation of results, and cost management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of treatment with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes as adoptive cell therapy: an integrative review. Epiphyseal displacement of the distal humerus in a neonate: a case report. Frailty over the rainbow: a cross-sectional study of LGBT+ adults aged over 50 years. Migration of metallic acupuncture threads from the breast to the right ventricle: a case report. Nephropulmonary fistula with coralliform stone migration into the thorax: a case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1