Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Herb Williams, Sarah A Thompson, Thomas Dawson, Naveen Muthu, Evan Orenstein
{"title":"充分发挥临床决策支持的潜力:将可用性测试转化为医疗运营中的日常实践。","authors":"Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Herb Williams, Sarah A Thompson, Thomas Dawson, Naveen Muthu, Evan Orenstein","doi":"10.1055/a-2404-2129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tools have a mixed record of effectiveness, often due to inadequate alignment with clinical workflows and poor usability. While there's a consensus that usability testing methods address these issues, in practice, usability testing is generally only used for selected projects (such as funded research studies). There is a critical need for CDS operations to apply usability testing to all CDS implementations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we share challenges with scaling usability in healthcare operations and alternative methods and CDS governance structures to enable usability testing as a routine practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We coalesce our experience and results of applying guerilla in-situ usability testing to over 20 projects in 1 year period with the proposed solution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate the feasibility of adopting \"guerilla in-situ usability testing\" in operations and their effectiveness in incorporating user feedback and improving design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although some methodological rigor was relaxed to accommodate operational speed, the benefits outweighed the limitations. Broader adoption of usability testing may transform CDS implementation and improve health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48956,"journal":{"name":"Applied Clinical Informatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Realizing the Full Potential of Clinical Decision Support: Translating Usability Testing into Routine Practice in healthcare operations.\",\"authors\":\"Swaminathan Kandaswamy, Herb Williams, Sarah A Thompson, Thomas Dawson, Naveen Muthu, Evan Orenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2404-2129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tools have a mixed record of effectiveness, often due to inadequate alignment with clinical workflows and poor usability. While there's a consensus that usability testing methods address these issues, in practice, usability testing is generally only used for selected projects (such as funded research studies). There is a critical need for CDS operations to apply usability testing to all CDS implementations.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we share challenges with scaling usability in healthcare operations and alternative methods and CDS governance structures to enable usability testing as a routine practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We coalesce our experience and results of applying guerilla in-situ usability testing to over 20 projects in 1 year period with the proposed solution.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We demonstrate the feasibility of adopting \\\"guerilla in-situ usability testing\\\" in operations and their effectiveness in incorporating user feedback and improving design.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although some methodological rigor was relaxed to accommodate operational speed, the benefits outweighed the limitations. Broader adoption of usability testing may transform CDS implementation and improve health outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48956,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Clinical Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-2129\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Clinical Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2404-2129","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Realizing the Full Potential of Clinical Decision Support: Translating Usability Testing into Routine Practice in healthcare operations.
Background: Clinical Decision Support (CDS) tools have a mixed record of effectiveness, often due to inadequate alignment with clinical workflows and poor usability. While there's a consensus that usability testing methods address these issues, in practice, usability testing is generally only used for selected projects (such as funded research studies). There is a critical need for CDS operations to apply usability testing to all CDS implementations.
Objectives: In this State of the Art / Best Practice paper, we share challenges with scaling usability in healthcare operations and alternative methods and CDS governance structures to enable usability testing as a routine practice.
Methods: We coalesce our experience and results of applying guerilla in-situ usability testing to over 20 projects in 1 year period with the proposed solution.
Results: We demonstrate the feasibility of adopting "guerilla in-situ usability testing" in operations and their effectiveness in incorporating user feedback and improving design.
Conclusion: Although some methodological rigor was relaxed to accommodate operational speed, the benefits outweighed the limitations. Broader adoption of usability testing may transform CDS implementation and improve health outcomes.
期刊介绍:
ACI is the third Schattauer journal dealing with biomedical and health informatics. It perfectly complements our other journals Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterMethods of Information in Medicine and the Öffnet internen Link im aktuellen FensterYearbook of Medical Informatics. The Yearbook of Medical Informatics being the “Milestone” or state-of-the-art journal and Methods of Information in Medicine being the “Science and Research” journal of IMIA, ACI intends to be the “Practical” journal of IMIA.