使用 7-F Optimo 球囊导引导管进行经桡动脉右颈动脉支架植入术的解剖学导航困难。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Interventional Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1177/15910199241276906
Kei Arakawa, Kei Harada, Masahito Kajihara, Ryuichiro Kiyosawa, Daichi Baba, Takatsugu Oshima
{"title":"使用 7-F Optimo 球囊导引导管进行经桡动脉右颈动脉支架植入术的解剖学导航困难。","authors":"Kei Arakawa, Kei Harada, Masahito Kajihara, Ryuichiro Kiyosawa, Daichi Baba, Takatsugu Oshima","doi":"10.1177/15910199241276906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) via the right radial artery (RA) was performed for stenosis of the right carotid artery. The factors affecting the difficulty in navigating the BGC from the right RA to the right common carotid artery (CCA) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For 40 cases of stenosis of the right carotid artery, CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC via the right RA was performed. Pre-operative anatomical length and angle of the access route were retrospectively examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 7-F Optimo BGC successfully reached all lesions; however, navigational difficulties were encountered in seven out of 40 cases (17.5%). One case in the difficult group experienced an ischemic complication. The height from the topmost point of the subclavian artery (SA) to the origin of the SA (SA height) was 44.4 mm versus 28.1 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and the angle between the SA and the CCA (SA-CCA angle) was 21.6° versus 47.9° (<i>p</i> < 0.01) in the difficult and easy groups, respectively. For lesions with difficult navigation, the sensitivity and specificity of the SA height >34 mm were 100% and 82%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the SA-CCA angle <30° were 100% and 82%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For stenosis of the right carotid artery, transradial-CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC is a safe procedure. However, navigating the BGC becomes difficult when the SA height is >34 mm and the SA-CCA angle is <30°.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anatomical navigational difficulties in transradial right carotid artery stenting with 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter.\",\"authors\":\"Kei Arakawa, Kei Harada, Masahito Kajihara, Ryuichiro Kiyosawa, Daichi Baba, Takatsugu Oshima\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15910199241276906\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) via the right radial artery (RA) was performed for stenosis of the right carotid artery. The factors affecting the difficulty in navigating the BGC from the right RA to the right common carotid artery (CCA) were investigated.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For 40 cases of stenosis of the right carotid artery, CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC via the right RA was performed. Pre-operative anatomical length and angle of the access route were retrospectively examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 7-F Optimo BGC successfully reached all lesions; however, navigational difficulties were encountered in seven out of 40 cases (17.5%). One case in the difficult group experienced an ischemic complication. The height from the topmost point of the subclavian artery (SA) to the origin of the SA (SA height) was 44.4 mm versus 28.1 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.01), and the angle between the SA and the CCA (SA-CCA angle) was 21.6° versus 47.9° (<i>p</i> < 0.01) in the difficult and easy groups, respectively. For lesions with difficult navigation, the sensitivity and specificity of the SA height >34 mm were 100% and 82%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the SA-CCA angle <30° were 100% and 82%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>For stenosis of the right carotid artery, transradial-CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC is a safe procedure. However, navigating the BGC becomes difficult when the SA height is >34 mm and the SA-CCA angle is <30°.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interventional Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241276906\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241276906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:使用 7-F Optimo 球囊导引导管(BGC)通过右侧桡动脉(RA)进行颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)治疗右侧颈动脉狭窄。材料和方法:对 40 例右颈动脉狭窄病例使用 7-F Optimo BGC 经由右 RA 进行 CAS 手术。对术前解剖长度和入路角度进行了回顾性检查:结果:7-F Optimo BGC成功到达所有病变部位,但40例中有7例(17.5%)遇到导航困难。困难组中有一例出现了缺血并发症。从锁骨下动脉(SA)最顶端到 SA 起源的高度(SA 高度)为 44.4 毫米对 28.1 毫米(P P 34 毫米分别为 100%和 82%),SA-CCA 角度的灵敏度和特异性均为 100%:对于右颈动脉狭窄,使用 7-F Optimo BGC 进行经桡动脉 CAS 是一种安全的手术。然而,当 SA 高度大于 34 毫米且 SA-CCA 角度为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Anatomical navigational difficulties in transradial right carotid artery stenting with 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter.

Objectives: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a 7-F Optimo balloon guide catheter (BGC) via the right radial artery (RA) was performed for stenosis of the right carotid artery. The factors affecting the difficulty in navigating the BGC from the right RA to the right common carotid artery (CCA) were investigated.

Materials and methods: For 40 cases of stenosis of the right carotid artery, CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC via the right RA was performed. Pre-operative anatomical length and angle of the access route were retrospectively examined.

Results: The 7-F Optimo BGC successfully reached all lesions; however, navigational difficulties were encountered in seven out of 40 cases (17.5%). One case in the difficult group experienced an ischemic complication. The height from the topmost point of the subclavian artery (SA) to the origin of the SA (SA height) was 44.4 mm versus 28.1 mm (p < 0.01), and the angle between the SA and the CCA (SA-CCA angle) was 21.6° versus 47.9° (p < 0.01) in the difficult and easy groups, respectively. For lesions with difficult navigation, the sensitivity and specificity of the SA height >34 mm were 100% and 82%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the SA-CCA angle <30° were 100% and 82%.

Conclusions: For stenosis of the right carotid artery, transradial-CAS using a 7-F Optimo BGC is a safe procedure. However, navigating the BGC becomes difficult when the SA height is >34 mm and the SA-CCA angle is <30°.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
期刊最新文献
Emergent endovascular treatment versus medical treatment for acute large vessel occlusions with nondisabling symptoms. Performance assessment of the Surpass Evolve flow diverter for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Safety and efficacy of coated flow diverters in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms during single antiplatelet therapy: A multicenter study. Silk vista baby flow diversion beyond the circle of Willis: A single-center experience with long-term outcomes. Barriers to stroke treatment: The price of long-distance from thrombectomy centers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1