在刑事司法机构的重新安置点实施 COVID-19 快速检测。

Yvane Ngassa, Julie Finn, Lauren Brinkley Rubinstein, Alysse Wurcel
{"title":"在刑事司法机构的重新安置点实施 COVID-19 快速检测。","authors":"Yvane Ngassa, Julie Finn, Lauren Brinkley Rubinstein, Alysse Wurcel","doi":"10.1089/jchc.23.09.0077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal was to study the implementation of rapid BINAX COVID-19 testing at criminal justice reentry sites, focusing on framework-guided implementation outcomes. We implemented rapid COVID-19 testing at nine reentry sites in four states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and New York) and collected test results to measure the (1) adoptability and (2) implementability of COVID-19 testing at reentry sites. We collected data on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the implementation of COVID-19 testing using an anonymous employee Qualtrics survey. Testing was available to symptomatic and exposed residents and employees. COVID-19 testing results were collected from October 2021 to March 2022. Guided by the Expert Recommendations in Implementing Change (ERIC) framework, we chose nine implementation strategies to address barriers during the implementation process. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility outcomes were captured from employees using validated measures. A total of 302 BINAX COVID-19 tests were used and 26 positive cases were identified. Forty-seven percent of employees participated in the survey. More than half of respondents either agreed or completely agreed with statements about the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of COVID-19 testing. Funding and attention toward COVID-19 testing at reentry sites should be provided to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 in these sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":73693,"journal":{"name":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"347-354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807904/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Criminal Justice Residential Reentry Sites.\",\"authors\":\"Yvane Ngassa, Julie Finn, Lauren Brinkley Rubinstein, Alysse Wurcel\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/jchc.23.09.0077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The goal was to study the implementation of rapid BINAX COVID-19 testing at criminal justice reentry sites, focusing on framework-guided implementation outcomes. We implemented rapid COVID-19 testing at nine reentry sites in four states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and New York) and collected test results to measure the (1) adoptability and (2) implementability of COVID-19 testing at reentry sites. We collected data on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the implementation of COVID-19 testing using an anonymous employee Qualtrics survey. Testing was available to symptomatic and exposed residents and employees. COVID-19 testing results were collected from October 2021 to March 2022. Guided by the Expert Recommendations in Implementing Change (ERIC) framework, we chose nine implementation strategies to address barriers during the implementation process. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility outcomes were captured from employees using validated measures. A total of 302 BINAX COVID-19 tests were used and 26 positive cases were identified. Forty-seven percent of employees participated in the survey. More than half of respondents either agreed or completely agreed with statements about the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of COVID-19 testing. Funding and attention toward COVID-19 testing at reentry sites should be provided to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 in these sites.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73693,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"347-354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11807904/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.23.09.0077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/jchc.23.09.0077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的目标是研究 BINAX COVID-19 快速检测在刑事司法重返场所的实施情况,重点关注框架指导下的实施结果。我们在四个州(马萨诸塞州、新罕布什尔州、罗德岛州和纽约州)的九个再教育机构实施了 COVID-19 快速检测,并收集了检测结果,以衡量 (1) COVID-19 检测在再教育机构的可采纳性和 (2) 可实施性。我们通过匿名员工 Qualtrics 调查收集了有关 COVID-19 检测的可接受性、适宜性和实施可行性的数据。有症状和暴露于病毒的居民和员工均可接受检测。COVID-19 检测结果的收集时间为 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 3 月。在实施变革专家建议(ERIC)框架的指导下,我们选择了九种实施策略来解决实施过程中的障碍。我们使用经过验证的测量方法从员工处获取可接受性、适宜性和可行性结果。共使用了 302 次 BINAX COVID-19 检测,发现了 26 个阳性病例。47% 的员工参与了调查。超过半数的受访者同意或完全同意有关 COVID-19 检测的可接受性、适当性或可行性的说法。应为重返社会场所的 COVID-19 检测提供资金并给予关注,以帮助防止 COVID-19 在这些场所的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Implementation of Rapid COVID-19 Testing in Criminal Justice Residential Reentry Sites.

The goal was to study the implementation of rapid BINAX COVID-19 testing at criminal justice reentry sites, focusing on framework-guided implementation outcomes. We implemented rapid COVID-19 testing at nine reentry sites in four states (Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, and New York) and collected test results to measure the (1) adoptability and (2) implementability of COVID-19 testing at reentry sites. We collected data on the acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility of the implementation of COVID-19 testing using an anonymous employee Qualtrics survey. Testing was available to symptomatic and exposed residents and employees. COVID-19 testing results were collected from October 2021 to March 2022. Guided by the Expert Recommendations in Implementing Change (ERIC) framework, we chose nine implementation strategies to address barriers during the implementation process. Acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility outcomes were captured from employees using validated measures. A total of 302 BINAX COVID-19 tests were used and 26 positive cases were identified. Forty-seven percent of employees participated in the survey. More than half of respondents either agreed or completely agreed with statements about the acceptability, appropriateness, or feasibility of COVID-19 testing. Funding and attention toward COVID-19 testing at reentry sites should be provided to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 in these sites.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Conducting Grief Support Groups in Prison: A Pragmatic Feasibility and Impact Study. Characterization of Dermatologic Disease and Challenges in Care of Incarcerated Patients. The Development, Delivery, Content, and Impact of Nutrition Education in Prisons: A Systematic Review. An Assessment of the Nutritional Profile of Foods Accessible to Incarcerated Males in Alabama. Resident Experiences at a Community Hospital Caring for Patients Who Are Incarcerated.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1