注册护士和助产士预科课程中的 LGBTQIA+ 医疗保健内容:横断面研究

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106363
Mengting Huang, Jacqueline Allen, Ensieh Fooladi
{"title":"注册护士和助产士预科课程中的 LGBTQIA+ 医疗保健内容:横断面研究","authors":"Mengting Huang,&nbsp;Jacqueline Allen,&nbsp;Ensieh Fooladi","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>p</em> = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (<em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106363"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739/pdfft?md5=2ae3795a884c5babe8ece300f57371de&pid=1-s2.0-S0260691724002739-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LGBTQIA+ healthcare content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula: A cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"Mengting Huang,&nbsp;Jacqueline Allen,&nbsp;Ensieh Fooladi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Settings</h3><p>Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.</p></div><div><h3>Sample</h3><p>Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001; <em>p</em> = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (<em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p &lt; 0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106363\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739/pdfft?md5=2ae3795a884c5babe8ece300f57371de&pid=1-s2.0-S0260691724002739-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002739","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景人们期望护士和助产士为 LGBTQIA+ 群体提供包容性护理。目的探讨澳大利亚注册前护理和助产士课程中的LGBTQIA+内容。样本在随机抽取的25所教育机构的在线课程手册中公开提供的澳大利亚注册前护理和助产课程项目。方法开发了一个LGBTQIA+术语矩阵,用于指导从科目标题、概要和学习成果中提取数据。显性术语指与 LGBTQIA+ 有密切联系的术语。隐含术语是与 LGBTQIA+ 间接相关的术语。对显性和隐性 LGBTQIA+ 术语进行频率分析。结果在 1093 个研究对象中,没有一个研究对象的题目包含显性术语,6 个(0.55%)题目包含隐性 LGBTQIA+ 术语。在 54 个(4.9%)科目概要中发现了明确的 LGBTQIA+ 术语,在 323 个(29.6%)科目概要中发现了隐含术语。在 14 项(1.3%)学习成果中发现了明确的 LGBTQIA+ 术语,而在 323 项(29.6%)学习成果中发现了隐含术语。八校联盟大学比非八校联盟大学更有可能使用明确和隐含的 LGBTQIA+ 术语(p < 0.001; p = 0.035)。与研究生课程相比,本科课程包含更多的LGBTQIA+术语(p = 0.019; p < 0.001)。核心科目比选修科目更有可能包含 LGBTQIA+ 内容(p < 0.001)。结论明确的 LGBTQIA+ 术语极少,表明总体内容有限。研究结果提醒护理和助产教育工作者采取有针对性的教学方法,以LGBTQIA+为重点,为未来的护士和助产士提供高质量的知识和技能支持,确保为LGBTQIA+人群提供公平、安全的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBTQIA+ healthcare content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula: A cross-sectional study

Background

Nurses and midwives are expected to provide inclusive care for LGBTQIA+ populations. However, there is a paucity of knowledge on how well-prepared nursing and midwifery graduates are for this aspect of their role.

Aim

To explore LGBTQIA+ content in pre-registration nursing and midwifery curricula in Australia.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Settings

Australian higher education institutions offering 86 pre-registration nursing and midwifery programs.

Sample

Publicly available pre-registration nursing and midwifery course programs in Australia as presented in the online course handbooks of 25 randomly selected educational institutions.

Methods

A LGBTQIA+ terminology matrix was developed to guide data extraction from subject titles, synopses, and learning outcomes. Explicit terms were those strongly associated with LGBTQIA+. Implicit terms were those indirectly associated with LGBTQIA+. Explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terms were analyzed for frequencies. Poisson regression was used to compare counts of LGBTQIA+ terms by course, subject, and university.

Results

Among the 1093 subjects, no subject titles included explicit terms and 6 (0.55 %) titles included implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was identified in 54 (4.9 %) subject synopses and implicit terminology was found in 323 (29.6 %) subject synopses. Explicit LGBTQIA+ terms were identified in 14 (1.3 %) learning outcomes while implicit terms were found in 323 (29.6 %) learning outcomes. Group of Eight universities were more likely to use explicit and implicit LGBTQIA+ terminology than non-Group of Eight universities (p < 0.001; p = 0.035). Undergraduate programs included more LGBTQIA+ terminology than postgraduate programs (p = 0.019; p < 0.001). Core subjects were more likely to include LGBTQIA+ content than elective subjects (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Explicit LGBTQIA+ terminology was minimal indicating limited overall content. The study results alert nursing and midwifery educators to take a targeted approach to teaching and learning with a LGBTQIA+ focus to support future nurses and midwives with quality knowledge and skills and ensure equitable and safe care for LGBTQIA+ people.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
The utility and feasibility of incorporating death cafes in undergraduate education: A qualitative exploration of medical and nursing students' perspectives The critical role of education in shaping nurses' attitudes and intentions towards neonatal palliative care: A network analysis Editorial Board Barriers and facilitators to the application of nurse practitioners' training pilot programs in China: A CFIR-guided descriptive qualitative study Perceptions of care homes as practice learning environments for pre-registration nursing students: A systematic-narrative hybrid literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1