{"title":"调查希腊幼儿园课堂中的信息文本朗读:文本结构的差异","authors":"Elissavet Chlapana, Emmanouil Ntagkinis","doi":"10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of the present study was to examine teachers’ practices for reading aloud informational texts to kindergarteners and describe whether these are affected by the different text structures. Ten (10) teachers working in public kindergartens located in different regions of Greece participated in the study. The sample teachers read informational texts that were created to represent the most common informational text structures: compare-contrast, description, cause-effect, problem-solution, and sequence. Read-aloud sessions were recorded and analyzed according to parameters that refer to well-documented read-aloud styles and ensure discussion quality and text comprehension. Indicative parameters were the timing of the discussion, teachers’ prompts and techniques for enhancing children’s language production, and their verbal participation in the text discussion. Data analysis showed that the teachers’ read-aloud practices stand more in favor of a dialogic reading style. Furthermore, the predominance of low cognitive demand questions and the children’s few initiatives to ask their own questions were representative of the discussion quality. There were also differences in the teachers’ read-aloud practices according to the structure of the texts, with the compare-contract structure being the most challenging one for the teachers and the children. The results of the present study have several implications for improving teachers’ read-aloud practices and kindergarteners’ text comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating Informational Text Read-alouds in Greek Kindergarten Classrooms: Differences According to Text Structures\",\"authors\":\"Elissavet Chlapana, Emmanouil Ntagkinis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The purpose of the present study was to examine teachers’ practices for reading aloud informational texts to kindergarteners and describe whether these are affected by the different text structures. Ten (10) teachers working in public kindergartens located in different regions of Greece participated in the study. The sample teachers read informational texts that were created to represent the most common informational text structures: compare-contrast, description, cause-effect, problem-solution, and sequence. Read-aloud sessions were recorded and analyzed according to parameters that refer to well-documented read-aloud styles and ensure discussion quality and text comprehension. Indicative parameters were the timing of the discussion, teachers’ prompts and techniques for enhancing children’s language production, and their verbal participation in the text discussion. Data analysis showed that the teachers’ read-aloud practices stand more in favor of a dialogic reading style. Furthermore, the predominance of low cognitive demand questions and the children’s few initiatives to ask their own questions were representative of the discussion quality. There were also differences in the teachers’ read-aloud practices according to the structure of the texts, with the compare-contract structure being the most challenging one for the teachers and the children. The results of the present study have several implications for improving teachers’ read-aloud practices and kindergarteners’ text comprehension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47818,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Childhood Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Investigating Informational Text Read-alouds in Greek Kindergarten Classrooms: Differences According to Text Structures
The purpose of the present study was to examine teachers’ practices for reading aloud informational texts to kindergarteners and describe whether these are affected by the different text structures. Ten (10) teachers working in public kindergartens located in different regions of Greece participated in the study. The sample teachers read informational texts that were created to represent the most common informational text structures: compare-contrast, description, cause-effect, problem-solution, and sequence. Read-aloud sessions were recorded and analyzed according to parameters that refer to well-documented read-aloud styles and ensure discussion quality and text comprehension. Indicative parameters were the timing of the discussion, teachers’ prompts and techniques for enhancing children’s language production, and their verbal participation in the text discussion. Data analysis showed that the teachers’ read-aloud practices stand more in favor of a dialogic reading style. Furthermore, the predominance of low cognitive demand questions and the children’s few initiatives to ask their own questions were representative of the discussion quality. There were also differences in the teachers’ read-aloud practices according to the structure of the texts, with the compare-contract structure being the most challenging one for the teachers and the children. The results of the present study have several implications for improving teachers’ read-aloud practices and kindergarteners’ text comprehension.
期刊介绍:
Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children.
Areas of Emphasis:
International studies;
Educational programs in diverse settings;
Early learning across multiple domains;
Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration;
Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies;
Best practices in early childhood teacher education;
Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development;
Family, school, and community relationships;
Investigations related to curriculum and instruction;
Articles that link theory and best practices;
Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field