N400 还是 P600?--对有关性别刻板印象侵犯的 ERP 研究的系统回顾

IF 2.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language and Linguistics Compass Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1111/lnc3.12530
Joanna Porkert, Anna Siyanova-Chanturia, Hanneke Loerts, Anja Schüppert, Merel Keijzer
{"title":"N400 还是 P600?--对有关性别刻板印象侵犯的 ERP 研究的系统回顾","authors":"Joanna Porkert,&nbsp;Anna Siyanova-Chanturia,&nbsp;Hanneke Loerts,&nbsp;Anja Schüppert,&nbsp;Merel Keijzer","doi":"10.1111/lnc3.12530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Psycholinguistic studies using the <i>event-related brain potential</i> (ERP) technique have found both N400 and P600 effects for gender stereotype violations. The finding of a P600 effect for this type of world knowledge violation is surprizing given that this component is traditionally associated with syntactic violations. In this paper, we set out to systematically analyse design- and task patterns of ERP studies investigating gender stereotype violations. Based on our review, we propose a scheme that predicts a P600 effect for gender stereotype violations for stimuli comprising entire sentences, and specifically when the gender stereotype serves to establish coherence in <i>inferences</i> (i.e., expecting a specific referent gender or a stereotype-appropriate behaviour of the sentence subject based on the gender stereotype information). We predict an N400 effect for gender stereotype information that does not serve to establish coherence in inferences, as well as in priming paradigms. By extension, our predictive scheme suggests that the N400 may reflect a hybrid process of semantic retrieval and integration, while the P600 may reflect a cognitive process of error monitoring, and mental revision. Our study can aid in the interpretation of previous findings and inform future studies investigating gender stereotyping.</p>","PeriodicalId":47472,"journal":{"name":"Language and Linguistics Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12530","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"N400 or P600?—A Systematic Review of ERP Studies on Gender Stereotype Violations\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Porkert,&nbsp;Anna Siyanova-Chanturia,&nbsp;Hanneke Loerts,&nbsp;Anja Schüppert,&nbsp;Merel Keijzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lnc3.12530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Psycholinguistic studies using the <i>event-related brain potential</i> (ERP) technique have found both N400 and P600 effects for gender stereotype violations. The finding of a P600 effect for this type of world knowledge violation is surprizing given that this component is traditionally associated with syntactic violations. In this paper, we set out to systematically analyse design- and task patterns of ERP studies investigating gender stereotype violations. Based on our review, we propose a scheme that predicts a P600 effect for gender stereotype violations for stimuli comprising entire sentences, and specifically when the gender stereotype serves to establish coherence in <i>inferences</i> (i.e., expecting a specific referent gender or a stereotype-appropriate behaviour of the sentence subject based on the gender stereotype information). We predict an N400 effect for gender stereotype information that does not serve to establish coherence in inferences, as well as in priming paradigms. By extension, our predictive scheme suggests that the N400 may reflect a hybrid process of semantic retrieval and integration, while the P600 may reflect a cognitive process of error monitoring, and mental revision. Our study can aid in the interpretation of previous findings and inform future studies investigating gender stereotyping.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47472,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/lnc3.12530\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Linguistics Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12530\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Linguistics Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lnc3.12530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用事件相关脑电位(ERP)技术进行的心理语言学研究发现,违反性别刻板印象会产生 N400 和 P600 效应。鉴于该成分传统上与句法违规有关,因此对这类世界知识违规的 P600 效应的发现令人惊讶。在本文中,我们系统地分析了调查性别刻板印象违规行为的 ERP 研究的设计和任务模式。根据我们的综述,我们提出了一个方案,预测在由整个句子组成的刺激中,特别是当性别刻板印象用于建立推断的一致性时(即根据性别刻板印象信息预期一个特定的指代性别或句子主体的刻板印象适当行为),性别刻板印象的违反会产生 P600 效应。我们预测,在推断和引物范式中,如果性别刻板印象信息没有起到建立一致性的作用,则会出现 N400 效应。推而广之,我们的预测方案表明,N400 可能反映了语义检索和整合的混合过程,而 P600 可能反映了错误监控和心理修正的认知过程。我们的研究有助于解释以往的研究结果,并为今后调查性别刻板印象的研究提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
N400 or P600?—A Systematic Review of ERP Studies on Gender Stereotype Violations

Psycholinguistic studies using the event-related brain potential (ERP) technique have found both N400 and P600 effects for gender stereotype violations. The finding of a P600 effect for this type of world knowledge violation is surprizing given that this component is traditionally associated with syntactic violations. In this paper, we set out to systematically analyse design- and task patterns of ERP studies investigating gender stereotype violations. Based on our review, we propose a scheme that predicts a P600 effect for gender stereotype violations for stimuli comprising entire sentences, and specifically when the gender stereotype serves to establish coherence in inferences (i.e., expecting a specific referent gender or a stereotype-appropriate behaviour of the sentence subject based on the gender stereotype information). We predict an N400 effect for gender stereotype information that does not serve to establish coherence in inferences, as well as in priming paradigms. By extension, our predictive scheme suggests that the N400 may reflect a hybrid process of semantic retrieval and integration, while the P600 may reflect a cognitive process of error monitoring, and mental revision. Our study can aid in the interpretation of previous findings and inform future studies investigating gender stereotyping.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Language and Linguistics Compass
Language and Linguistics Compass LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: Unique in its range, Language and Linguistics Compass is an online-only journal publishing original, peer-reviewed surveys of current research from across the entire discipline. Language and Linguistics Compass publishes state-of-the-art reviews, supported by a comprehensive bibliography and accessible to an international readership. Language and Linguistics Compass is aimed at senior undergraduates, postgraduates and academics, and will provide a unique reference tool for researching essays, preparing lectures, writing a research proposal, or just keeping up with new developments in a specific area of interest.
期刊最新文献
Challenges and Strategies for Acquiring Adjectives Issue Information N400 or P600?—A Systematic Review of ERP Studies on Gender Stereotype Violations Culmination phenomena across languages Phonetic cues to depression: A sociolinguistic perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1