基于分布式观测和多源证据融合的配电网络区域故障定位

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3450916
Miaomiao Zhou;Mengshi Li;Xiaosheng Xu;Qinghua Wu
{"title":"基于分布式观测和多源证据融合的配电网络区域故障定位","authors":"Miaomiao Zhou;Mengshi Li;Xiaosheng Xu;Qinghua Wu","doi":"10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3450916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes a multi-source evidence generation strategy (MEGS) that utilises distributed measurements to train a multi-classification support vector machine (SVM) for each observer. An observer employs time-frequency analysis to transform local current signals into feature samples, which serve as inputs to the SVM. The output of the SVM is then subjected to grey relational analysis and a voting mechanism to determine the probability of observers in identifying faults within the section. Due to the inherent uncertainty and variability of faults, the direct application of Dempster-Shafer theory (D-S theory) may result in diagnostic inaccuracies. To address this issue, we introduce an evidence fusion approach based on propositional consistency and evidence consistency (PCEC). Simulation results demonstrate that PCEC significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy beyond that achieved by individual classifiers, with an accuracy of 99.41% under ideal conditions. Factors such as load variations, sampling errors, or single observer errors may affect the quality of the evidence. However, the PCEC is effective in improving diagnostic accuracy. Further ablation studies and comparative analyses with other fusion methods validate the proposed modifications to the D-S theory as both reasonable and superior in terms of accuracy.","PeriodicalId":13498,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","volume":"39 6","pages":"3061-3070"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional Fault Location of Distribution Network Based on Distributed Observation and Fusion of Multi-Source Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Miaomiao Zhou;Mengshi Li;Xiaosheng Xu;Qinghua Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3450916\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes a multi-source evidence generation strategy (MEGS) that utilises distributed measurements to train a multi-classification support vector machine (SVM) for each observer. An observer employs time-frequency analysis to transform local current signals into feature samples, which serve as inputs to the SVM. The output of the SVM is then subjected to grey relational analysis and a voting mechanism to determine the probability of observers in identifying faults within the section. Due to the inherent uncertainty and variability of faults, the direct application of Dempster-Shafer theory (D-S theory) may result in diagnostic inaccuracies. To address this issue, we introduce an evidence fusion approach based on propositional consistency and evidence consistency (PCEC). Simulation results demonstrate that PCEC significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy beyond that achieved by individual classifiers, with an accuracy of 99.41% under ideal conditions. Factors such as load variations, sampling errors, or single observer errors may affect the quality of the evidence. However, the PCEC is effective in improving diagnostic accuracy. Further ablation studies and comparative analyses with other fusion methods validate the proposed modifications to the D-S theory as both reasonable and superior in terms of accuracy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13498,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"3061-3070\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10654313/\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10654313/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文提出了一种多源证据生成策略(MEGS),利用分布式测量为每个观测器训练一个多分类支持向量机(SVM)。观测器利用时频分析将本地电流信号转换为特征样本,作为 SVM 的输入。然后,SVM 的输出会经过灰色关系分析和投票机制,以确定观测器识别区段内故障的概率。由于故障固有的不确定性和可变性,直接应用 Dempster-Shafer 理论(D-S 理论)可能会导致诊断不准确。为解决这一问题,我们引入了一种基于命题一致性和证据一致性(PCEC)的证据融合方法。仿真结果表明,PCEC 显著提高了诊断准确率,超过了单个分类器所能达到的准确率,在理想条件下准确率高达 99.41%。负载变化、采样误差或单个观察者误差等因素可能会影响证据的质量。不过,PCEC 能有效提高诊断准确性。进一步的消融研究以及与其他融合方法的比较分析验证了对 D-S 理论的修改建议是合理的,而且在准确性方面更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional Fault Location of Distribution Network Based on Distributed Observation and Fusion of Multi-Source Evidence
This paper proposes a multi-source evidence generation strategy (MEGS) that utilises distributed measurements to train a multi-classification support vector machine (SVM) for each observer. An observer employs time-frequency analysis to transform local current signals into feature samples, which serve as inputs to the SVM. The output of the SVM is then subjected to grey relational analysis and a voting mechanism to determine the probability of observers in identifying faults within the section. Due to the inherent uncertainty and variability of faults, the direct application of Dempster-Shafer theory (D-S theory) may result in diagnostic inaccuracies. To address this issue, we introduce an evidence fusion approach based on propositional consistency and evidence consistency (PCEC). Simulation results demonstrate that PCEC significantly enhances diagnostic accuracy beyond that achieved by individual classifiers, with an accuracy of 99.41% under ideal conditions. Factors such as load variations, sampling errors, or single observer errors may affect the quality of the evidence. However, the PCEC is effective in improving diagnostic accuracy. Further ablation studies and comparative analyses with other fusion methods validate the proposed modifications to the D-S theory as both reasonable and superior in terms of accuracy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Society embraces planning, research, development, design, application, construction, installation and operation of apparatus, equipment, structures, materials and systems for the safe, reliable and economic generation, transmission, distribution, conversion, measurement and control of electric energy. It includes the developing of engineering standards, the providing of information and instruction to the public and to legislators, as well as technical scientific, literary, educational and other activities that contribute to the electric power discipline or utilize the techniques or products within this discipline.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Blank Page IEEE Power & Energy Society Information IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Information for Authors A Graphical Tool to Examine the Coordination Details of Directional Overcurrent Protections as a Function of Fault Location
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1