基于血液转录组开发创伤后多器官衰竭/功能障碍综合征的生物标志物预测模型。

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1186/s13613-024-01364-5
Ivan Duran, Ankita Banerjee, Patrick J Flaherty, Yok-Ai Que, Colleen M Ryan, Laurence G Rahme, Amy Tsurumi
{"title":"基于血液转录组开发创伤后多器官衰竭/功能障碍综合征的生物标志物预测模型。","authors":"Ivan Duran, Ankita Banerjee, Patrick J Flaherty, Yok-Ai Que, Colleen M Ryan, Laurence G Rahme, Amy Tsurumi","doi":"10.1186/s13613-024-01364-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple organ failure/dysfunction syndrome (MOF/MODS) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among severe trauma patients. Current clinical practices entail monitoring physiological measurements and applying clinical score systems to diagnose its onset. Instead, we aimed to develop an early prediction model for MOF outcome evaluated soon after traumatic injury by performing machine learning analysis of genome-wide transcriptome data from blood samples drawn within 24 h of traumatic injury. We then compared its performance to baseline injury severity scores and detection of infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Buffy coat transcriptome and linked clinical datasets from blunt trauma patients from the Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Study (\"Glue Grant\") multi-center cohort were used. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 141 adult (age ≥ 16 years old) blunt trauma patients (excluding penetrating) with early buffy coat (≤ 24 h since trauma injury) samples were analyzed, with 58 MOF-cases and 83 non-cases. We applied the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms to select features and develop models for MOF early outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LASSO model included 18 transcripts (AUROC [95% CI]: 0.938 [0.890-0.987] (training) and 0.833 [0.699-0.967] (test)), and the XGBoost model included 41 transcripts (0.999 [0.997-1.000] (training) and 0.907 [0.816-0.998] (test)). There were 16 overlapping transcripts comparing the two panels (0.935 [0.884-0.985] (training) and 0.836 [0.703-0.968] (test)). The biomarker models notably outperformed models based on injury severity scores and sex, which we found to be significantly associated with MOF (APACHEII + sex-0.649 [0.537-0.762] (training) and 0.493 [0.301-0.685] (test); ISS + sex-0.630 [0.516-0.744] (training) and 0.482 [0.293-0.670] (test); NISS + sex-0.651 [0.540-0.763] (training) and 0.525 [0.335-0.714] (test)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accurate assessment of MOF from blood samples immediately after trauma is expected to aid in improving clinical decision-making and may contribute to reduced morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Moreover, understanding the molecular mechanisms involving the transcripts identified as important for MOF prediction may eventually aid in developing novel interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358370/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a biomarker prediction model for post-trauma multiple organ failure/dysfunction syndrome based on the blood transcriptome.\",\"authors\":\"Ivan Duran, Ankita Banerjee, Patrick J Flaherty, Yok-Ai Que, Colleen M Ryan, Laurence G Rahme, Amy Tsurumi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13613-024-01364-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple organ failure/dysfunction syndrome (MOF/MODS) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among severe trauma patients. Current clinical practices entail monitoring physiological measurements and applying clinical score systems to diagnose its onset. Instead, we aimed to develop an early prediction model for MOF outcome evaluated soon after traumatic injury by performing machine learning analysis of genome-wide transcriptome data from blood samples drawn within 24 h of traumatic injury. We then compared its performance to baseline injury severity scores and detection of infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Buffy coat transcriptome and linked clinical datasets from blunt trauma patients from the Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Study (\\\"Glue Grant\\\") multi-center cohort were used. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 141 adult (age ≥ 16 years old) blunt trauma patients (excluding penetrating) with early buffy coat (≤ 24 h since trauma injury) samples were analyzed, with 58 MOF-cases and 83 non-cases. We applied the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms to select features and develop models for MOF early outcome prediction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LASSO model included 18 transcripts (AUROC [95% CI]: 0.938 [0.890-0.987] (training) and 0.833 [0.699-0.967] (test)), and the XGBoost model included 41 transcripts (0.999 [0.997-1.000] (training) and 0.907 [0.816-0.998] (test)). There were 16 overlapping transcripts comparing the two panels (0.935 [0.884-0.985] (training) and 0.836 [0.703-0.968] (test)). The biomarker models notably outperformed models based on injury severity scores and sex, which we found to be significantly associated with MOF (APACHEII + sex-0.649 [0.537-0.762] (training) and 0.493 [0.301-0.685] (test); ISS + sex-0.630 [0.516-0.744] (training) and 0.482 [0.293-0.670] (test); NISS + sex-0.651 [0.540-0.763] (training) and 0.525 [0.335-0.714] (test)).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The accurate assessment of MOF from blood samples immediately after trauma is expected to aid in improving clinical decision-making and may contribute to reduced morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Moreover, understanding the molecular mechanisms involving the transcripts identified as important for MOF prediction may eventually aid in developing novel interventions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11358370/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01364-5\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-024-01364-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多器官衰竭/功能障碍综合征(MOF/MODS)是严重创伤患者死亡和发病的主要原因。目前的临床实践需要监测生理测量值并应用临床评分系统来诊断其发病。相反,我们的目标是通过对创伤后 24 小时内抽取的血液样本中的全基因组转录组数据进行机器学习分析,开发出创伤后不久评估 MOF 结果的早期预测模型。然后,我们将其性能与基线损伤严重程度评分和感染检测进行了比较:我们使用了来自炎症和宿主对损伤的反应研究("Glue Grant")多中心队列的钝性创伤患者的水洗外套转录组和相关临床数据集。根据纳入/排除标准,我们分析了141名成年(年龄≥16岁)钝性创伤患者(不包括穿透性创伤)的早期水包膜(创伤后≤24小时)样本,其中有58例MOF病例和83例非病例。我们采用最小绝对收缩和选择操作器(LASSO)和极梯度提升(XGBoost)算法来选择特征并开发用于MOF早期结果预测的模型:LASSO模型包括18个转录本(AUROC [95% CI]:0.938[0.890-0.987](训练)和 0.833 [0.699-0.967](测试)),XGBoost 模型包括 41 个转录本(0.999 [0.997-1.000](训练)和 0.907 [0.816-0.998](测试))。两组比较有 16 个重叠转录本(0.935 [0.884-0.985](训练)和 0.836 [0.703-0.968](测试))。生物标志物模型的表现明显优于基于损伤严重程度评分和性别的模型,我们发现损伤严重程度评分和性别与 MOF 显著相关(APACHEII + 性别-0.649 [0.537-0.762](训练)和 0.493[0.301-0.685](测试);ISS + 性别-0.630 [0.516-0.744](训练)和 0.482 [0.293-0.670](测试);NISS + 性别-0.651 [0.540-0.763](训练)和 0.525 [0.335-0.714](测试)):创伤后立即从血液样本中准确评估 MOF 预计将有助于改善临床决策,并可能有助于降低发病率、死亡率和医疗成本。此外,了解被确定为对 MOF 预测重要的转录本的分子机制可能最终有助于开发新型干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a biomarker prediction model for post-trauma multiple organ failure/dysfunction syndrome based on the blood transcriptome.

Background: Multiple organ failure/dysfunction syndrome (MOF/MODS) is a major cause of mortality and morbidity among severe trauma patients. Current clinical practices entail monitoring physiological measurements and applying clinical score systems to diagnose its onset. Instead, we aimed to develop an early prediction model for MOF outcome evaluated soon after traumatic injury by performing machine learning analysis of genome-wide transcriptome data from blood samples drawn within 24 h of traumatic injury. We then compared its performance to baseline injury severity scores and detection of infections.

Methods: Buffy coat transcriptome and linked clinical datasets from blunt trauma patients from the Inflammation and the Host Response to Injury Study ("Glue Grant") multi-center cohort were used. According to the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 141 adult (age ≥ 16 years old) blunt trauma patients (excluding penetrating) with early buffy coat (≤ 24 h since trauma injury) samples were analyzed, with 58 MOF-cases and 83 non-cases. We applied the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms to select features and develop models for MOF early outcome prediction.

Results: The LASSO model included 18 transcripts (AUROC [95% CI]: 0.938 [0.890-0.987] (training) and 0.833 [0.699-0.967] (test)), and the XGBoost model included 41 transcripts (0.999 [0.997-1.000] (training) and 0.907 [0.816-0.998] (test)). There were 16 overlapping transcripts comparing the two panels (0.935 [0.884-0.985] (training) and 0.836 [0.703-0.968] (test)). The biomarker models notably outperformed models based on injury severity scores and sex, which we found to be significantly associated with MOF (APACHEII + sex-0.649 [0.537-0.762] (training) and 0.493 [0.301-0.685] (test); ISS + sex-0.630 [0.516-0.744] (training) and 0.482 [0.293-0.670] (test); NISS + sex-0.651 [0.540-0.763] (training) and 0.525 [0.335-0.714] (test)).

Conclusions: The accurate assessment of MOF from blood samples immediately after trauma is expected to aid in improving clinical decision-making and may contribute to reduced morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. Moreover, understanding the molecular mechanisms involving the transcripts identified as important for MOF prediction may eventually aid in developing novel interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
期刊最新文献
Long-term major events after hospital discharge for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with hematological malignancies: a one-year retrospective nationwide cohort study Impact of critical illness on continuation of anticancer treatment and prognosis of patients with aggressive hematological malignancies Oxygen therapy in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: guidelines from the SRLF-SFMU consensus conference. Innate immune response in acute critical illness: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1