开腹、腹腔镜辅助、机器人辅助胃癌远端切除术:来自随机临床试验的证据。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Anticancer research Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.21873/anticanres.17198
Toru Aoyama, Yukio Maezawa, Itaru Hashimoto
{"title":"开腹、腹腔镜辅助、机器人辅助胃癌远端切除术:来自随机临床试验的证据。","authors":"Toru Aoyama, Yukio Maezawa, Itaru Hashimoto","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for both early and locally advanced GC. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used for decades for the treatment of benign diseases, such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The use of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for the treatment of gastric cancer was first described by Kitano in 1994. Since then, the number of gastric cancer cases treated with LADG has gradually increased. Recently, robot-assisted gastrectomy (RDG) has also been introduced in the treatment of GC. To date, several randomized control trials (RCT) have been conducted to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LADG and RDG in comparison to open distal gastrectomy (ODG). However, the short- and long-term oncological outcomes of LADG and RDG remain controversial and have not been fully evaluated. To optimize GC treatment, especially gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each approach before gastric cancer treatment. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives of LADG and RDG in GC treatment using RCT data.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open, Laparoscopy-assisted, Robotic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Evidence from Randomized Clinical Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Toru Aoyama, Yukio Maezawa, Itaru Hashimoto\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17198\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for both early and locally advanced GC. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used for decades for the treatment of benign diseases, such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The use of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for the treatment of gastric cancer was first described by Kitano in 1994. Since then, the number of gastric cancer cases treated with LADG has gradually increased. Recently, robot-assisted gastrectomy (RDG) has also been introduced in the treatment of GC. To date, several randomized control trials (RCT) have been conducted to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LADG and RDG in comparison to open distal gastrectomy (ODG). However, the short- and long-term oncological outcomes of LADG and RDG remain controversial and have not been fully evaluated. To optimize GC treatment, especially gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each approach before gastric cancer treatment. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives of LADG and RDG in GC treatment using RCT data.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17198\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胃癌(GC)是全球第五大常见癌症,也是导致癌症相关死亡的第四大原因。胃切除加淋巴结切除术是治疗早期和局部晚期胃癌的标准方法。几十年来,腹腔镜手术已广泛用于良性疾病的治疗,如胆囊切除术和阑尾切除术。北野(Kitano)于 1994 年首次描述了腹腔镜辅助远端胃切除术(LADG)用于治疗胃癌。此后,使用 LADG 治疗胃癌的病例逐渐增多。最近,机器人辅助胃切除术(RDG)也被引入胃癌的治疗中。迄今为止,已有多项随机对照试验(RCT)评估了 LADG 和 RDG 与开腹远端胃切除术(ODG)相比的安全性、可行性和有效性。然而,LADG 和 RDG 的短期和长期肿瘤治疗效果仍存在争议,尚未得到全面评估。为了优化胃癌治疗,尤其是胃切除加淋巴结清扫术,有必要在胃癌治疗前了解每种方法的特点。本综述利用 RCT 数据总结了 LADG 和 RDG 治疗胃癌的背景、现状和未来展望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open, Laparoscopy-assisted, Robotic-assisted Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Evidence from Randomized Clinical Trials.

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most common cancer and fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is the standard treatment for both early and locally advanced GC. Laparoscopic surgery has been widely used for decades for the treatment of benign diseases, such as cholecystectomy and appendectomy. The use of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) for the treatment of gastric cancer was first described by Kitano in 1994. Since then, the number of gastric cancer cases treated with LADG has gradually increased. Recently, robot-assisted gastrectomy (RDG) has also been introduced in the treatment of GC. To date, several randomized control trials (RCT) have been conducted to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of LADG and RDG in comparison to open distal gastrectomy (ODG). However, the short- and long-term oncological outcomes of LADG and RDG remain controversial and have not been fully evaluated. To optimize GC treatment, especially gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy, it is necessary to understand the characteristics of each approach before gastric cancer treatment. This review summarizes the background, current status, and future perspectives of LADG and RDG in GC treatment using RCT data.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
期刊最新文献
A Gene Expression Signature that Predicts Gastric Cancer Sensitivity to PARP Inhibitor Therapy. A Prospective Observational Study Analyzing the Diversity and Specific Composition of the Oral and Gut Microbiota in Lung Cancer Patients. Accuracy of Preoperative Magnet Resonance Imaging to Predict Pathologic T-Stage in Patients With Cervical Cancer. Association Between ABCC2 -24C>T and Nab-Paclitaxel-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Japanese Patients With Pancreatic Cancer. Association of Plasma Nestin With Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Combined With Chemotherapy in Extensive-stage Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Pilot Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1