一致性与相互关系:大肠癌患者及其配偶照顾者主观认知障碍的二元视角。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING Seminars in Oncology Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151717
Ye Wang , Xiaoke Qiu , Yi Zhang , Rongyu Li , Zheng Sun , Qiuping Li
{"title":"一致性与相互关系:大肠癌患者及其配偶照顾者主观认知障碍的二元视角。","authors":"Ye Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Qiu ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Rongyu Li ,&nbsp;Zheng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiuping Li","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample <em>t</em> test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all <em>P</em> &lt; .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing</h3><p>Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"40 5","pages":"Article 151717"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Congruence and Interrelationship: A Dyadic Perspective on the Subjective Cognitive Impairment in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers\",\"authors\":\"Ye Wang ,&nbsp;Xiaoke Qiu ,&nbsp;Yi Zhang ,&nbsp;Rongyu Li ,&nbsp;Zheng Sun ,&nbsp;Qiuping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample <em>t</em> test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all <em>P</em> &lt; .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing</h3><p>Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54253,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"volume\":\"40 5\",\"pages\":\"Article 151717\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seminars in Oncology Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400192X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074920812400192X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的结肠直肠癌(CRC)患者自述有主观认知障碍(SCI),而其配偶护理人员则认为患者有主观认知障碍。这项横断面研究评估了患者自我报告与配偶照顾者感知的 SCI 之间的一致性,并从夫妇的角度研究了影响 SCI 的因素:共邀请了 200 对 CRC 患者及其配偶照顾者完成调查,评估了他们的 SCI、伴侣应对(DC)、生活质量、焦虑和抑郁情况。采用类内相关系数(ICC)和配对样本 t 检验分析一致性。影响因素分析采用了皮尔逊相关、分层多元回归和行为者-伴侣相互依赖中介模型:患者报告的 SCI 与配偶感知的 SCI 之间的一致性从中等到良好不等(ICC = 0.75 至 0.86)。在控制了人口统计学变量(患者的性别和配偶的工作状况)后,患者和配偶照顾者的直流电以及患者的情绪健康对患者的 SCI 有显著的预测作用(所有 P < .05)。在行为者-伙伴相互依赖中介模型中,患者和配偶照顾者的 DC 与 SCI 之间存在行为者效应,而患者的 DC 与 SCI 之间存在伙伴效应。此外,患者和配偶照顾者的情绪健康(焦虑和抑郁)在DC和SCI之间具有中介效应:结论:配偶照顾者在患者 SCI 的评估和管理中发挥着重要作用。患者和配偶照顾者的 DC 以及患者的情绪健康(如焦虑和抑郁)是预测患者 SCI 的主要因素:对护理工作的启示:护理人员在评估和管理 SCI 时应考虑患者和配偶护理者观点的重要性。本研究支持护士关注 SCI 的一致性和相互关系,以加强 CRC 患者及其配偶护理者的 DC。这种方法旨在减少情绪困扰,并从患者双方的角度制定认知干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Congruence and Interrelationship: A Dyadic Perspective on the Subjective Cognitive Impairment in the Patients with Colorectal Cancer and Their Spousal Caregivers

Objectives

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) reported experiencing subjective cognitive impairment (SCI), and their spousal caregivers perceived the patients’ SCI. This cross-sectional study assessed the congruence of SCI between the patients’ self-reports and the spousal caregivers’ perceptions and examined the factors affecting SCI from the dyadic perspective.

Methods

A total of 200 dyads of patients with CRC and their spousal caregivers were invited to complete the survey, which evaluated the SCI, dyadic coping (DC), quality of life, anxiety, and depression for the dyads. Congruence was analyzed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and paired-sample t test. Impacting factors analysis was conducted using Pearson correlations, hierarchical multiple regression, and actor–partner interdependence mediation model.

Results

The congruency of SCI between the patient-reported and the spouse-perceived ranged from moderate to good (ICC = 0.75 to 0.86). After controlling demographic variables (the patients’ gender and spouses’ work status), the DC of both patients and spousal caregivers, and the emotional health of patients were significant predictors for patients’ SCI (all P < .05). In the actor–partner interdependence mediation model, there was an actor effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers and a partner effect between DC and SCI for patients. Moreover, patients’ emotional health (anxiety and depression) had the mediating effect between DC and SCI for both patients and spousal caregivers.

Conclusion

Spousal caregivers played a vital role in assessment and management in the SCI of patients. The DC of patients and spousal caregivers and the emotional health of patients (eg, anxiety and depression) were major predictors for the SCI of patients.

Implications for Nursing

Nursing providers should consider the importance of patients’ and spousal caregivers’ perspectives in assessing and managing SCI. This study supports nurses focusing on the congruence and interrelationship of SCI to enhance DC for CRC patients and their spousal caregivers. This approach aims to reduce emotional distress and develop cognitive interventions from a dyadic perspective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Masthead Nonpharmacological Interventions for the Fatigue–Pain–Sleep Disturbance Symptom Cluster in Lung Cancer Patients: Best Evidence Summary Development of a Scale to Assess Cancer Attitude in the Community The Effect of Virtual Reality Distraction and Fatigue Training on Anxiety and Fatigue Levels in Children with Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1