唇裂修复:唇裂对鼻唇沟外观有何影响?

IF 2.1 2区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.013
Markus Merkl , Vasco Starke , Michala Ivanic-Sefcikova, Marc Brommer, Wolfgang Zemann, Michael Schwaiger
{"title":"唇裂修复:唇裂对鼻唇沟外观有何影响?","authors":"Markus Merkl ,&nbsp;Vasco Starke ,&nbsp;Michala Ivanic-Sefcikova,&nbsp;Marc Brommer,&nbsp;Wolfgang Zemann,&nbsp;Michael Schwaiger","doi":"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cleft lip re-repair is a procedure frequently endorsed to enhance a compromised nasolabial appearance. However, the actual effect of such revision surgery on the nasolabial appearance has scarcely been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to critically review surgical outcomes of patients that underwent surgical re-do of their cleft lip, using well-validated objective and subjective methods and standardised outcome measures.</div><div>20 patients with at least 6 months follow-up after cleft lip re-repair were assessed. Standardised pre- and postoperative photographs were analysed. The objective assessment was carried out using the SymNose-software. Furthermore, a subjective evaluation of the nasolabial area was conducted by ten examiners who rated seven parameters using a Likert-scale ranging from 1to5. The objective evaluation showed substantial improvement regarding symmetry values. Significant postoperative decrease in labial asymmetry from 26.42% (±8.13) to 18.77% (±6.28) (p &lt; 0.001) and upper lip asymmetry in relation to the facial midline (26.91% (±8.03) vs. 18.27% (±5.17) (p &lt; 0.001)) was observed. Similar results were corroborated in the subjective analysis. Differences regarding the ratings were detected considering the examiners’ professional background and level of expertise. Cleft re-repair was found to significantly improve upper lip symmetry and lead to a more harmonious nasolabial appearance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54851,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"52 11","pages":"Pages 1267-1273"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cleft lip re-repair: How does it affect the nasolabial appearance?\",\"authors\":\"Markus Merkl ,&nbsp;Vasco Starke ,&nbsp;Michala Ivanic-Sefcikova,&nbsp;Marc Brommer,&nbsp;Wolfgang Zemann,&nbsp;Michael Schwaiger\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcms.2024.08.013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cleft lip re-repair is a procedure frequently endorsed to enhance a compromised nasolabial appearance. However, the actual effect of such revision surgery on the nasolabial appearance has scarcely been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to critically review surgical outcomes of patients that underwent surgical re-do of their cleft lip, using well-validated objective and subjective methods and standardised outcome measures.</div><div>20 patients with at least 6 months follow-up after cleft lip re-repair were assessed. Standardised pre- and postoperative photographs were analysed. The objective assessment was carried out using the SymNose-software. Furthermore, a subjective evaluation of the nasolabial area was conducted by ten examiners who rated seven parameters using a Likert-scale ranging from 1to5. The objective evaluation showed substantial improvement regarding symmetry values. Significant postoperative decrease in labial asymmetry from 26.42% (±8.13) to 18.77% (±6.28) (p &lt; 0.001) and upper lip asymmetry in relation to the facial midline (26.91% (±8.03) vs. 18.27% (±5.17) (p &lt; 0.001)) was observed. Similar results were corroborated in the subjective analysis. Differences regarding the ratings were detected considering the examiners’ professional background and level of expertise. Cleft re-repair was found to significantly improve upper lip symmetry and lead to a more harmonious nasolabial appearance.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54851,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":\"52 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1267-1273\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002415\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010518224002415","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

唇裂修复术是一种经常被用来改善受损鼻唇外观的手术。然而,此类修复手术对鼻唇外观的实际影响却鲜有研究。因此,本研究的目的是采用经过充分验证的主客观方法和标准化结果测量方法,对接受唇裂修复手术的患者的手术结果进行严格审查。本研究评估了 20 名唇裂修复术后随访至少 6 个月的患者。对标准化的术前和术后照片进行了分析。客观评估使用 SymNose 软件进行。此外,十位检查人员还对鼻唇沟区域进行了主观评估,他们使用李克特量表(1-5分)对七个参数进行了评分。客观评估结果显示,对称值有了显著改善。术后唇部不对称率从 26.42% (±8.13) 显著下降到 18.77% (±6.28) (p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cleft lip re-repair: How does it affect the nasolabial appearance?
Cleft lip re-repair is a procedure frequently endorsed to enhance a compromised nasolabial appearance. However, the actual effect of such revision surgery on the nasolabial appearance has scarcely been studied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to critically review surgical outcomes of patients that underwent surgical re-do of their cleft lip, using well-validated objective and subjective methods and standardised outcome measures.
20 patients with at least 6 months follow-up after cleft lip re-repair were assessed. Standardised pre- and postoperative photographs were analysed. The objective assessment was carried out using the SymNose-software. Furthermore, a subjective evaluation of the nasolabial area was conducted by ten examiners who rated seven parameters using a Likert-scale ranging from 1to5. The objective evaluation showed substantial improvement regarding symmetry values. Significant postoperative decrease in labial asymmetry from 26.42% (±8.13) to 18.77% (±6.28) (p < 0.001) and upper lip asymmetry in relation to the facial midline (26.91% (±8.03) vs. 18.27% (±5.17) (p < 0.001)) was observed. Similar results were corroborated in the subjective analysis. Differences regarding the ratings were detected considering the examiners’ professional background and level of expertise. Cleft re-repair was found to significantly improve upper lip symmetry and lead to a more harmonious nasolabial appearance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
22.60%
发文量
117
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery publishes articles covering all aspects of surgery of the head, face and jaw. Specific topics covered recently have included: • Distraction osteogenesis • Synthetic bone substitutes • Fibroblast growth factors • Fetal wound healing • Skull base surgery • Computer-assisted surgery • Vascularized bone grafts
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of oral posaconazole and surgical debridement of rhino maxillofacial mucormycosis. A generalizable procedure for Brown's class Ⅱ and Ⅲ defects reconstruction with deep circumflex iliac artery flap using computer-assisted technique. Editorial Board Announcements Maxilla management in “phase II” skeletal surgery for obstructive sleep apnea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1