Evaluation of upper extremity functional capacity and activities of daily living in patients with heart failure: A cross-sectional study

Background

Considering the limitations in activities of daily living (ADL) and the impact of improvements in patients with heart failure (HF), appropriate assessment of upper extremity functional capacity and ADL is important.

Objectives

To evaluate upper extremity functional capacity and ADL in patients with HF and compare them with healthy controls.

Methods

This study included 30 HF patients and healthy controls. Upper extremity functional capacity was assessed with the 6-Minute Pegboard Ring Test (6PBRT), ADL by the Londrina protocol, exercise capacity by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), peripheral muscle strength by hand dynamometer, and dyspnea by Modified Medical Research Council Scale (MMRC). For performance tests, pre-test (resting) and post-test (after performance) values ​​were also measured.

Results

Patients with HF with ejection fraction ≤50 % and controls were similar in terms of age (52.63±6.2 and 50.03±6.5 years, respectively) and gender (25 females for each group) (p > 0.05). Patients showed a statistically significant increase in total test time in the Londrina protocol and fewer rings moved in 6PBRT (p < 0.0001). The post-test dyspnea (p = 0.03) and pre-test arm fatigue (p < 0.0001) were observed to be higher in patients in the Londrina protocol. There was a statistically significant group by time interaction in the patients’ pre- and post-test lower heart rate (F= 4.80, p = 0.03), post-test dyspnea (p < 0.0001), and post-test arm fatigue (p = 0.005) were observed to be higher in patients in 6PBRT.

Conclusions

The evidence showed a decrease in upper extremity functional capacity in patients with HF. Patients required more time to perform their ADLs compared with healthy controls.