接受新辅助治疗的局部软组织肉瘤患者的病理完全反应及其与临床结果的相关性:系统综述

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-08-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102820
{"title":"接受新辅助治疗的局部软组织肉瘤患者的病理完全反应及其与临床结果的相关性:系统综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pathologic complete response in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy and its correlation with clinical outcomes: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102820\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001488\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001488","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软组织肉瘤(STS)约占成人实体恶性肿瘤的 1%,主要采用手术治疗,围手术期治疗方法的选择是一项极具挑战性且高度个性化的决定。评估STS新辅助治疗模式的临床试验主要以临床结果或放射学反应作为终点,病理完全反应(pCR)并未作为指定的研究终点。我们的系统性综述旨在评估STS不同新辅助方法临床试验中的pCR率及其与患者临床结果的相关性。我们纳入了 23 项 I、II 和 III 期研究,从中检索了每种治疗方法的 pCR 率数据,以及 pCR 与临床预后的相关性。在 16 项评估 pCR 的试验中,获得 pCR 的患者比例从 8% 到 58% 不等。这些试验中的大多数并不旨在建立 pCR 与临床结果之间的关联。不过,在那些研究了这种相关性的试验中,发现 pCR 与 5 年疾病特异性生存(DSS)和 5 年总生存(OS)之间存在正相关。虽然 pCR 是指导其他肿瘤(如三阴性乳腺癌和尿路上皮癌)治疗决策的重要标志物,但它尚未用于类似的 STS。我们的研究结果表明,在不同的 STS 新辅助治疗中,患者获得 pCR 的情况各不相同,而且可能与患者的预后呈正相关。因此,我们建议在未来的 STS 前瞻性试验中将 pCR 作为替代终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pathologic complete response in patients with localized soft tissue sarcoma treated with neoadjuvant therapy and its correlation with clinical outcomes: A systematic review

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS), comprising approximately 1% of adult solid malignancies, are primarily treated with surgery, with the choice of perioperative treatment being a challenging and highly individualized decision. Clinical trials assessing neoadjuvant modalities in STS predominantly use clinical outcomes or radiologic response as endpoints, with pathologic complete response (pCR) not being employed as a designated study endpoint. Our systematic review aimed to assess the rates of pCR in clinical trials of different neoadjuvant modalities for STS and its correlation with patient clinical outcomes. 23 phase I, II and III studies were included, from which data regarding rates of pCR with each treatment, as well as correlation of pCR with clinical outcomes were retrieved. In 16 trials that assessed pCR, the percentage of patients who achieved a pCR ranged from 8 to 58%. Most of these trials did not aim to establish an association between pCR and clinical outcomes. However, among those that did investigate this correlation, a positive association was identified between pCR and both 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). While pCR serves as a crucial marker guiding treatment decisions in other neoplasms like triple negative breast cancer and urothelial cancer, it is not yet used in a similar setting for STS. Our findings indicate variability in patients achieving pCR across different neoadjuvant treatments for STS and a possible positive correlation with patient outcomes. Consequently, we propose considering pCR as a surrogate endpoint in future prospective trials for STS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer Induction treatment with FOLFIRINOX or oxaliplatin-based doublet followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. A systematic review and pooled analysis from phase II and III trials. Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review Bone complications of cancer treatment Abemaciclib increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in breast cancer: Integrate meta-analysis, pharmacovigilance database analysis, and in vitro validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1