癌症胰腺切除术后中期死亡率评估

Lauren M Janczewski, Michael R Visenio, Rachel Hae-Soo Joung, Anthony D Yang, David D O’Dell, Elizabeth C Danielson, Mitchell C Posner, Ted A Skolarus, David J Bentrem, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan P Merkow
{"title":"癌症胰腺切除术后中期死亡率评估","authors":"Lauren M Janczewski, Michael R Visenio, Rachel Hae-Soo Joung, Anthony D Yang, David D O’Dell, Elizabeth C Danielson, Mitchell C Posner, Ted A Skolarus, David J Bentrem, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan P Merkow","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p < .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p < .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p < .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Conclusion Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"99 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Intermediate-Term Mortality Following Pancreatectomy for Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Lauren M Janczewski, Michael R Visenio, Rachel Hae-Soo Joung, Anthony D Yang, David D O’Dell, Elizabeth C Danielson, Mitchell C Posner, Ted A Skolarus, David J Bentrem, Karl Y Bilimoria, Ryan P Merkow\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p < .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p < .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p < .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Conclusion Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 胰腺癌的致死率仍然很高,切除是治愈的唯一机会。虽然患者会被告知短期(0-3 个月)死亡率,但对术后 3-6 个月(中期)的死亡率却知之甚少。我们评估了中期死亡率的预测因素,评估了医院层面的差异,并开发了一个预测中期死亡风险的提名图。方法 从国家癌症数据库(2010-2020 年)中识别出接受胰腺癌切除术的患者。多变量逻辑回归确定了中期死亡率的预测因素,并评估了短期死亡率和中期死亡率之间的差异。按中期死亡率四分位数分组的多项式回归评估了医院层面的差异。建立了一个神经网络模型来预测中期死亡风险。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。结果 在45297名患者中,有3974人(8.9%)在术后6个月内死亡,其中2216人(5.1%)为中期死亡。与 6 个月后的存活率相比,中期死亡率与 T 类增加、结节阳性、缺乏系统治疗和边缘阳性有关(所有 p &p;lt;0.05)。与短期死亡率相比,中期死亡率与在大医院治疗、结节阳性、新辅助系统治疗、辅助放疗和边缘阳性有关(均为 p &;lt;.05)。每家医院的中期死亡率中位数为 4.5%(IQR 2.6-6.5)。四分位数最高的医院采用新辅助系统疗法、新辅助放疗和辅助放疗的几率较低(均为 p &;lt;.05)。神经网络提名图在预测个体化中期死亡风险方面具有很高的准确性(准确率:0.9499;AUC-ROC:0.7531)。结论 近 10%的癌症胰腺切除术患者在 6 个月内死亡,其中一半发生在中期。这些数据对改善讨论根治性胰腺切除术时的共同决策具有现实意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Intermediate-Term Mortality Following Pancreatectomy for Cancer
Background Pancreatic cancer remains highly lethal and resection represents the only chance for cure. Although patients are counseled regarding short-term (0-3 months) mortality, little is known about mortality 3-6 months (intermediate-term) following surgery. We assessed predictors of intermediate-term mortality, evaluated hospital-level variation, and developed a nomogram to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. Methods Patients undergoing pancreatic cancer resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2010-2020). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of intermediate-term mortality and assessed differences between short-term and intermediate-term mortality. Multinomial regression grouped by intermediate-term mortality quartiles evaluated hospital-level variation. A neural network model was constructed to predict intermediate-term mortality risk. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results Of 45,297 patients, 3,974 (8.9%) died within 6-months of surgery of which 2,216 (5.1%) were intermediate-term. Intermediate-term mortality was associated with increasing T-category, positive nodes, lack of systemic therapy, and positive margins (all p < .05) compared with survival beyond 6-months. Compared with short-term, intermediate-term mortality was associated with treatment at high-volume hospitals, positive nodes, neoadjuvant systemic therapy, adjuvant radiotherapy, and positive margins (all p < .05). Median intermediate-term mortality rate per hospital was 4.5% (IQR 2.6-6.5). Highest quartile hospitals had decreased odds of treatment with neoadjuvant systemic therapy, neoadjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant radiotherapy (all p < .05). The neural network nomogram was highly accurate (Accuracy: 0.9499; AUC-ROC of 0.7531) in predicting individualized intermediate-term mortality risk. Conclusion Nearly 10% of patients undergoing pancreatectomy for cancer died within 6-months of which half occurred in the intermediate-term. These data have real-world implications to improve shared decision-making when discussing curative-intent pancreatectomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Elevated risk of lung cancer among asian American females who have never smoked: an emerging cancer disparity First Cycle Toxicity and Survival in Patients with Rare Cancers Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors The Association of Where Patients with Prostate Cancer Live and Receive Care on Racial Treatment Inequities Projected Outcomes of Reduced-Biopsy Management of Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Implications for Relabeling Proinflammatory Dietary Pattern and Risk of Total and Subtypes of Breast Cancer Among U.S. Women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1