内侧和外侧半月板同种异体移植物移植中移植物撕裂结构的差异:使用磁共振成像进行客观评估

Jongjin Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Seong-Il Bin, Taehyeon Jeon, Kinam Bae, Donghyok Kim
{"title":"内侧和外侧半月板同种异体移植物移植中移植物撕裂结构的差异:使用磁共振成像进行客观评估","authors":"Jongjin Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Seong-Il Bin, Taehyeon Jeon, Kinam Bae, Donghyok Kim","doi":"10.1177/03635465241271592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Few studies have compared the characteristics of meniscal allograft tears between medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using bone fixation.Purpose:To investigate the prevalence, location, and patterns of allograft tears after MAT with the bone fixation technique and compare tear patterns between medial and lateral compartments according to the time elapsed after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The charts of consecutive patients who underwent primary medial or lateral MAT between December 1996 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The location, pattern, and postoperative periods during which allograft tears occurred were evaluated by reviewing all series of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter with the patient's agreement. Postoperative periods for allograft tears were defined as the time between surgery and the follow-up MRI scan in which the meniscal tear was first confirmed. Allograft tears were compared between the medial and lateral MAT groups.Results:A total of 327 consecutive patients who underwent MAT (55 medial, 272 lateral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of allograft tears after medial and lateral MATs were 32.7% and 30.9%, respectively. The mean times for tears were 80.1 ± 81.1 months and 48.9 ± 46.3 months in the medial and lateral MAT groups, respectively ( P = .130). In both the medial and lateral MAT groups, allograft tears were observed mainly in the posterior horn, with complex tears being the most commonly identified tear type. In medial MATs, root tears were the second most common at 27.8%, with a significantly higher proportion than the lateral MATs ( P = .014). On the other hand, in lateral MATs, meniscocapsular separation and radial tears were the second most common at 15.5% each, albeit not significantly more common than in medial MATs ( P = .123 and P = .454, respectively). All root tears in medial MATs and meniscocapsular separations in lateral MATs were observed within 1 year postoperatively.Conclusion:Significant differences in allograft tear patterns were identified between the medial and lateral MAT groups. The proportion of root tears in medial MATs was higher than that in lateral MATs; conversely, the proportion of meniscocapsular separation was more common in lateral MATs. Such tear patterns, which may require surgical repair or graft resection, were observed only within 1 year of surgery. Therefore, close observation and regular follow-up in the earlier postoperative period are necessary after medial or lateral MATs.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Graft Tear Configurations in Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Objective Evaluations Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging\",\"authors\":\"Jongjin Lee, Jong-Min Kim, Bum-Sik Lee, Seong-Il Bin, Taehyeon Jeon, Kinam Bae, Donghyok Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03635465241271592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Few studies have compared the characteristics of meniscal allograft tears between medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using bone fixation.Purpose:To investigate the prevalence, location, and patterns of allograft tears after MAT with the bone fixation technique and compare tear patterns between medial and lateral compartments according to the time elapsed after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The charts of consecutive patients who underwent primary medial or lateral MAT between December 1996 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The location, pattern, and postoperative periods during which allograft tears occurred were evaluated by reviewing all series of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter with the patient's agreement. Postoperative periods for allograft tears were defined as the time between surgery and the follow-up MRI scan in which the meniscal tear was first confirmed. Allograft tears were compared between the medial and lateral MAT groups.Results:A total of 327 consecutive patients who underwent MAT (55 medial, 272 lateral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of allograft tears after medial and lateral MATs were 32.7% and 30.9%, respectively. The mean times for tears were 80.1 ± 81.1 months and 48.9 ± 46.3 months in the medial and lateral MAT groups, respectively ( P = .130). In both the medial and lateral MAT groups, allograft tears were observed mainly in the posterior horn, with complex tears being the most commonly identified tear type. In medial MATs, root tears were the second most common at 27.8%, with a significantly higher proportion than the lateral MATs ( P = .014). On the other hand, in lateral MATs, meniscocapsular separation and radial tears were the second most common at 15.5% each, albeit not significantly more common than in medial MATs ( P = .123 and P = .454, respectively). All root tears in medial MATs and meniscocapsular separations in lateral MATs were observed within 1 year postoperatively.Conclusion:Significant differences in allograft tear patterns were identified between the medial and lateral MAT groups. The proportion of root tears in medial MATs was higher than that in lateral MATs; conversely, the proportion of meniscocapsular separation was more common in lateral MATs. Such tear patterns, which may require surgical repair or graft resection, were observed only within 1 year of surgery. Therefore, close observation and regular follow-up in the earlier postoperative period are necessary after medial or lateral MATs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":517411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241271592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241271592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的:调查使用骨固定技术进行半月板同种异体移植(MAT)后同种异体撕裂的发生率、位置和模式,并根据术后时间比较内侧和外侧间的撕裂模式。研究设计:队列研究;证据级别:3.方法:回顾性审查了1996年12月至2019年6月间接受初级内侧或外侧MAT的连续患者的病历。在患者同意的情况下,分别于术后 6 周、3 个月、6 个月和 1 年以及之后每 2 年进行一次磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,通过回顾所有系列的随访扫描,评估发生同种异体移植撕裂的位置、模式和术后时期。异体半月板撕裂的术后时间是指从手术到首次确认半月板撕裂的随访核磁共振扫描之间的时间。结果:共对 327 名连续接受 MAT(内侧 55 例,外侧 272 例)且至少随访 2 年的患者进行了回顾性研究。内侧和外侧MAT术后异体移植物撕裂的发生率分别为32.7%和30.9%。内侧和外侧 MAT 组的平均撕裂时间分别为 80.1 ± 81.1 个月和 48.9 ± 46.3 个月 ( P = .130)。在内侧和外侧 MAT 组中,异体移植物撕裂主要发生在后角,复杂性撕裂是最常见的撕裂类型。在内侧 MAT 中,根撕裂是第二常见的撕裂类型,占 27.8%,比例明显高于外侧 MAT(P = 0.014)。另一方面,在外侧 MATs 中,半月板囊分离和径向撕裂是第二常见的撕裂类型,分别占 15.5%,但并不明显高于内侧 MATs(分别为 P = .123 和 P = .454)。所有内侧 MATs 的根部撕裂和外侧 MATs 的半月板囊分离都是在术后 1 年内观察到的。内侧 MAT 的根部撕裂比例高于外侧 MAT;相反,外侧 MAT 的半月板瓣分离比例更高。只有在手术后 1 年内才能观察到这种可能需要手术修复或移植切除的撕裂模式。因此,在进行内侧或外侧 MAT 手术后,有必要在术后早期进行密切观察和定期随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in Graft Tear Configurations in Medial and Lateral Meniscal Allograft Transplantation: Objective Evaluations Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Background:Few studies have compared the characteristics of meniscal allograft tears between medial and lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) using bone fixation.Purpose:To investigate the prevalence, location, and patterns of allograft tears after MAT with the bone fixation technique and compare tear patterns between medial and lateral compartments according to the time elapsed after surgery.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:The charts of consecutive patients who underwent primary medial or lateral MAT between December 1996 and June 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The location, pattern, and postoperative periods during which allograft tears occurred were evaluated by reviewing all series of follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, which were performed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively and every 2 years thereafter with the patient's agreement. Postoperative periods for allograft tears were defined as the time between surgery and the follow-up MRI scan in which the meniscal tear was first confirmed. Allograft tears were compared between the medial and lateral MAT groups.Results:A total of 327 consecutive patients who underwent MAT (55 medial, 272 lateral) with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively reviewed. The incidences of allograft tears after medial and lateral MATs were 32.7% and 30.9%, respectively. The mean times for tears were 80.1 ± 81.1 months and 48.9 ± 46.3 months in the medial and lateral MAT groups, respectively ( P = .130). In both the medial and lateral MAT groups, allograft tears were observed mainly in the posterior horn, with complex tears being the most commonly identified tear type. In medial MATs, root tears were the second most common at 27.8%, with a significantly higher proportion than the lateral MATs ( P = .014). On the other hand, in lateral MATs, meniscocapsular separation and radial tears were the second most common at 15.5% each, albeit not significantly more common than in medial MATs ( P = .123 and P = .454, respectively). All root tears in medial MATs and meniscocapsular separations in lateral MATs were observed within 1 year postoperatively.Conclusion:Significant differences in allograft tear patterns were identified between the medial and lateral MAT groups. The proportion of root tears in medial MATs was higher than that in lateral MATs; conversely, the proportion of meniscocapsular separation was more common in lateral MATs. Such tear patterns, which may require surgical repair or graft resection, were observed only within 1 year of surgery. Therefore, close observation and regular follow-up in the earlier postoperative period are necessary after medial or lateral MATs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High Rate of Return to Sport in Contact and Collision Athletes After Arthroscopic Latarjet With Cortical Button Fixation. Posterior Glenoid Bone Grafting in the Setting of Excessive Glenoid Retroversion Does Not Provide Adequate Stability in a Cadaveric Posterior Instability Model. Association of Undercorrection With Residual Proinflammatory Gene Expressions and Clinical Outcomes After Medial Open Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy. Outcomes After Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation of the Medial Femoral Condyle in Patients With Varus and Nonvarus Alignment. Posterior Tibial Slope Measured on Plain Radiograph Versus MRI and Its Association With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case-Control Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1