保护还是嘲讽?应对隐私威胁的双重策略

IF 6.9 3区 管理学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information Systems Frontiers Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s10796-024-10531-9
Lu Yu, Li He, Jian Du, Xiaobo Wu
{"title":"保护还是嘲讽?应对隐私威胁的双重策略","authors":"Lu Yu, Li He, Jian Du, Xiaobo Wu","doi":"10.1007/s10796-024-10531-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Dealing with privacy threats and adopting appropriate strategies to manage personal information have become crucial challenges for internet users. While adaptive problem-focused coping (APFC) has been extensively discussed in the literature on information privacy, little is known about maladaptive emotion-focused coping (MEFC). This paper proposes that individuals employ privacy protection motivation (a form of APFC) and privacy cynicism (a form of MEFC), according to their threat and coping appraisals. These two coping strategies will then influence their behaviour regarding the disclosure of personal information on the internet. Offering an empirical analysis of 346 samples of survey data from China, this paper reveals that privacy cynicism, which is mainly affected by deep concerns about privacy and high self-efficacy but low response efficacy, and inconsistency between users’ motivations for protecting their privacy and their actual disclosure behavior are the reasons for the privacy paradox. This study provides crucial theoretical support and practical guidance for the privacy management of internet users’ information.</p>","PeriodicalId":13610,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Frontiers","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protection or Cynicism? Dual Strategies for Coping with Privacy Threats\",\"authors\":\"Lu Yu, Li He, Jian Du, Xiaobo Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10796-024-10531-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Dealing with privacy threats and adopting appropriate strategies to manage personal information have become crucial challenges for internet users. While adaptive problem-focused coping (APFC) has been extensively discussed in the literature on information privacy, little is known about maladaptive emotion-focused coping (MEFC). This paper proposes that individuals employ privacy protection motivation (a form of APFC) and privacy cynicism (a form of MEFC), according to their threat and coping appraisals. These two coping strategies will then influence their behaviour regarding the disclosure of personal information on the internet. Offering an empirical analysis of 346 samples of survey data from China, this paper reveals that privacy cynicism, which is mainly affected by deep concerns about privacy and high self-efficacy but low response efficacy, and inconsistency between users’ motivations for protecting their privacy and their actual disclosure behavior are the reasons for the privacy paradox. This study provides crucial theoretical support and practical guidance for the privacy management of internet users’ information.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Systems Frontiers\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Systems Frontiers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10531-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Frontiers","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10531-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

应对隐私威胁和采取适当策略管理个人信息已成为互联网用户面临的重要挑战。有关信息隐私的文献广泛讨论了适应性问题应对(APFC),但对适应性不良情绪应对(MEFC)却知之甚少。本文提出,个人根据其威胁和应对评估,采用隐私保护动机(APFC 的一种形式)和隐私愤世嫉俗(MEFC 的一种形式)。这两种应对策略将影响他们在互联网上披露个人信息的行为。通过对中国 346 个调查样本数据的实证分析,本文揭示了隐私愤世嫉俗(主要受对隐私的深度担忧和高自我效能但低反应效能的影响)和用户保护隐私的动机与实际披露行为之间的不一致性是隐私悖论的原因。本研究为网民信息隐私管理提供了重要的理论支持和实践指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Protection or Cynicism? Dual Strategies for Coping with Privacy Threats

Dealing with privacy threats and adopting appropriate strategies to manage personal information have become crucial challenges for internet users. While adaptive problem-focused coping (APFC) has been extensively discussed in the literature on information privacy, little is known about maladaptive emotion-focused coping (MEFC). This paper proposes that individuals employ privacy protection motivation (a form of APFC) and privacy cynicism (a form of MEFC), according to their threat and coping appraisals. These two coping strategies will then influence their behaviour regarding the disclosure of personal information on the internet. Offering an empirical analysis of 346 samples of survey data from China, this paper reveals that privacy cynicism, which is mainly affected by deep concerns about privacy and high self-efficacy but low response efficacy, and inconsistency between users’ motivations for protecting their privacy and their actual disclosure behavior are the reasons for the privacy paradox. This study provides crucial theoretical support and practical guidance for the privacy management of internet users’ information.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information Systems Frontiers
Information Systems Frontiers 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
18.60%
发文量
127
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The interdisciplinary interfaces of Information Systems (IS) are fast emerging as defining areas of research and development in IS. These developments are largely due to the transformation of Information Technology (IT) towards networked worlds and its effects on global communications and economies. While these developments are shaping the way information is used in all forms of human enterprise, they are also setting the tone and pace of information systems of the future. The major advances in IT such as client/server systems, the Internet and the desktop/multimedia computing revolution, for example, have led to numerous important vistas of research and development with considerable practical impact and academic significance. While the industry seeks to develop high performance IS/IT solutions to a variety of contemporary information support needs, academia looks to extend the reach of IS technology into new application domains. Information Systems Frontiers (ISF) aims to provide a common forum of dissemination of frontline industrial developments of substantial academic value and pioneering academic research of significant practical impact.
期刊最新文献
What Affects User Experience of Shared Mobility Services? Insights from Integrating Signaling Theory and Value Framework AI in the Organizational Nexus: Building Trust, Cementing Commitment, and Evolving Psychological Contracts A Grey Combined Prediction Model for Medical Treatment Risk Analysis during Pandemics Stress Level Assessment by a Multi-Parametric Wearable Platform: Relevance of Different Physiological Signals Classifying DSS Research – A Theoretical Framework
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1