Dahryn Trivedi, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Sambhu Mondal, Snehasis Jana
{"title":"生物场能量疗法后使用 NIH 工具箱对成人认知运动功能评分的改善：随机对照双盲试验","authors":"Dahryn Trivedi, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Sambhu Mondal, Snehasis Jana","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing interest for the use of an alternative treatment approach like biofield energy therapy for managing various diseases. However, the effectiveness of distance mode of biofield energy therapy on neuropsychological function has not been examined so far.</p><p><strong>Primary study objective: </strong>The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy therapy via distant mode for the benefits of neuropsychological functions in adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It comprised of three parallel groups (control, sham control, and biofield intervention). The cognitive-motor functioning scores were monitored using NIH-Toolbox in 119 adult subjects on day 0, day 90, and day 180.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult human subjects (male and female) with one or more psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Biofield energy therapy through distant/remote (virtual) mode.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The cognitive-motor functioning scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cognitive-motor functioning scores were significantly improved in the biofield intervention group compared to the control and sham control groups: cognition- language (P < .0057 to P < .0001), working memory (P < .0001), episodic memory function (P < .0369 to P < .0001), and executive function (P < .0386 to P < .0029); motor- locomotion P < .0001), standing balance (P = .0144 to P = .0019), dexterity (P = .0474 to P < .0001), grip strength (P = .0132 to P = .0078) and endurance (P = .0041 to P = .0004). No adverse effects were observed throughout the study. Physical vital signs and blood parameters were within the normal ranges during the entire study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, cognitive and motor functions significantly improved in the blessing intervention group compared to the naïve control and sham control groups, which ultimately improved the neuropsychological function and quality of life in adult subjects.</p>","PeriodicalId":7571,"journal":{"name":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Improvement of Cognitive-Motor Function Scores Using the NIH-Toolbox in Adults Subjects After Biofield Energy Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Dahryn Trivedi, Mahendra Kumar Trivedi, Alice Branton, Sambhu Mondal, Snehasis Jana\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing interest for the use of an alternative treatment approach like biofield energy therapy for managing various diseases. However, the effectiveness of distance mode of biofield energy therapy on neuropsychological function has not been examined so far.</p><p><strong>Primary study objective: </strong>The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy therapy via distant mode for the benefits of neuropsychological functions in adult subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It comprised of three parallel groups (control, sham control, and biofield intervention). The cognitive-motor functioning scores were monitored using NIH-Toolbox in 119 adult subjects on day 0, day 90, and day 180.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Double-blind, single-center, randomized controlled trial (RCT).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Adult human subjects (male and female) with one or more psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Biofield energy therapy through distant/remote (virtual) mode.</p><p><strong>Primary outcome measures: </strong>The cognitive-motor functioning scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cognitive-motor functioning scores were significantly improved in the biofield intervention group compared to the control and sham control groups: cognition- language (P < .0057 to P < .0001), working memory (P < .0001), episodic memory function (P < .0369 to P < .0001), and executive function (P < .0386 to P < .0029); motor- locomotion P < .0001), standing balance (P = .0144 to P = .0019), dexterity (P = .0474 to P < .0001), grip strength (P = .0132 to P = .0078) and endurance (P = .0041 to P = .0004). No adverse effects were observed throughout the study. Physical vital signs and blood parameters were within the normal ranges during the entire study period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, cognitive and motor functions significantly improved in the blessing intervention group compared to the naïve control and sham control groups, which ultimately improved the neuropsychological function and quality of life in adult subjects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7571,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternative therapies in health and medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative therapies in health and medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTEGRATIVE & COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景：人们越来越关注使用生物场能量疗法等替代治疗方法来治疗各种疾病。然而，迄今为止，尚未研究过生物场能量疗法远程模式对神经心理功能的有效性：研究旨在评估生物场能量疗法通过远程模式对成年受试者神经心理功能的益处：方法：研究包括三个平行组（对照组、假对照组和生物场干预组）。方法：该研究包括三个平行组（对照组、假对照组和生物场干预组），使用 NIH-Toolbox 监测 119 名成年受试者在第 0 天、第 90 天和第 180 天的认知运动功能评分：双盲、单中心、随机对照试验（RCT）：干预措施：通过远距离/单中心随机对照试验（RCT）进行生物场能量治疗：干预措施：通过远距离/远程（虚拟）模式进行生物场能量治疗：认知运动功能评分：结果：与对照组和假对照组相比，生物场干预组的认知运动功能得分明显提高：认知-语言（P < .0057 至 P < .0001）、工作记忆（P < .0001）、外显记忆功能（P < .0369 到 P < .0001）和执行功能（P < .0386 到 P < .0029）；运动--运动（P < .0001）、站立平衡（P = .0144 到 P = .0019）、灵巧（P = .0474 到 P < .0001）、握力（P = .0132 到 P = .0078）和耐力（P = .0041 到 P = .0004）。整个研究过程中未发现任何不良反应。在整个研究期间，身体生命体征和血液指标均在正常范围内：总体而言，与天真对照组和假对照组相比，祝福干预组的认知和运动功能明显改善，最终改善了成年受试者的神经心理功能和生活质量。
The Improvement of Cognitive-Motor Function Scores Using the NIH-Toolbox in Adults Subjects After Biofield Energy Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Double-blind Trial.
Background: There is a growing interest for the use of an alternative treatment approach like biofield energy therapy for managing various diseases. However, the effectiveness of distance mode of biofield energy therapy on neuropsychological function has not been examined so far.
Primary study objective: The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of biofield energy therapy via distant mode for the benefits of neuropsychological functions in adult subjects.
Methods: It comprised of three parallel groups (control, sham control, and biofield intervention). The cognitive-motor functioning scores were monitored using NIH-Toolbox in 119 adult subjects on day 0, day 90, and day 180.
Participants: Adult human subjects (male and female) with one or more psychological symptoms.
Intervention: Biofield energy therapy through distant/remote (virtual) mode.
Primary outcome measures: The cognitive-motor functioning scores.
Results: The cognitive-motor functioning scores were significantly improved in the biofield intervention group compared to the control and sham control groups: cognition- language (P < .0057 to P < .0001), working memory (P < .0001), episodic memory function (P < .0369 to P < .0001), and executive function (P < .0386 to P < .0029); motor- locomotion P < .0001), standing balance (P = .0144 to P = .0019), dexterity (P = .0474 to P < .0001), grip strength (P = .0132 to P = .0078) and endurance (P = .0041 to P = .0004). No adverse effects were observed throughout the study. Physical vital signs and blood parameters were within the normal ranges during the entire study period.
Conclusions: Overall, cognitive and motor functions significantly improved in the blessing intervention group compared to the naïve control and sham control groups, which ultimately improved the neuropsychological function and quality of life in adult subjects.
期刊介绍：
Launched in 1995, Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine has a mission to promote the art and science of integrative medicine and a responsibility to improve public health. We strive to maintain the highest standards of ethical medical journalism independent of special interests that is timely, accurate, and a pleasure to read. We publish original, peer-reviewed scientific articles that provide health care providers with continuing education to promote health, prevent illness, and treat disease. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine was the first journal in this field to be indexed in the National Library of Medicine. In 2006, 2007, and 2008, ATHM had the highest impact factor ranking of any independently published peer-reviewed CAM journal in the United States—meaning that its research articles were cited more frequently than any other journal’s in the field.
Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine does not endorse any particular system or method but promotes the evaluation and appropriate use of all effective therapeutic approaches. Each issue contains a variety of disciplined inquiry methods, from case reports to original scientific research to systematic reviews. The editors encourage the integration of evidence-based emerging therapies with conventional medical practices by licensed health care providers in a way that promotes a comprehensive approach to health care that is focused on wellness, prevention, and healing. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine hopes to inform all licensed health care practitioners about developments in fields other than their own and to foster an ongoing debate about the scientific, clinical, historical, legal, political, and cultural issues that affect all of health care.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
