世界卫生组织急性呼吸道感染患儿护理质量评估标准:意大利基线多中心评估(CHOICE)结果。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS BMJ Paediatrics Open Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002552
Marzia Lazzerini, Massimo Dagnelut, Paolo Dalena, Idanna Sforzi, Maristella Toniutti, Enrico Felici, Silvia Bressan, Gian Luca Trobia, Stefano Martelossi, Riccardo Lubrano, Silvia Fasoli, Federico Marchetti, Andrea Iuorio, Chiara Grisaffi, Silvia Galiazzo, Francesca Patanè, Chiara Stefani, Maria Luisa Casciana, Angela Troisi, Egidio Barbi
{"title":"世界卫生组织急性呼吸道感染患儿护理质量评估标准:意大利基线多中心评估(CHOICE)结果。","authors":"Marzia Lazzerini, Massimo Dagnelut, Paolo Dalena, Idanna Sforzi, Maristella Toniutti, Enrico Felici, Silvia Bressan, Gian Luca Trobia, Stefano Martelossi, Riccardo Lubrano, Silvia Fasoli, Federico Marchetti, Andrea Iuorio, Chiara Grisaffi, Silvia Galiazzo, Francesca Patanè, Chiara Stefani, Maria Luisa Casciana, Angela Troisi, Egidio Barbi","doi":"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Experience is lacking on the implementation of the WHO standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at facility level. We describe the use of 10 prioritised WHO standard-based quality measures to assess provision of care for children with acute respiratory infections (ARI) in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre observational study across 11 emergency departments with different characteristics, we collected 10 WHO standard-based quality measures related to case management of children with ARI and no emergency/priority signs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 3145 children were collected. Major differences in QOC across facilities were observed: documentation of saturation level and respiratory rate varied from 34.3% to 100% and from 10.7% to 62.7%, respectively (p<0.001); antibiotic prescription rates ranged from 22.6% to 80.0% (p<0.001), with significant differences in the pattern of prescribed antibiotic; hospitalisations rates ranged between 2.3% and 30.6% (p<0.001). When corrected for children's individual sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the variable more consistently associated with each analysed outcome was the individual facility where the child was managed. Higher rates of antibiotics prescription (+33.1%, p<0.001) and hospitalisation (+24.7%, p<0.001) were observed for facilities in Southern Italy, while university centres were associated with lower hospitalisation rates (-13.1%, p<0.001), independently from children's characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of 10 WHO standard-based measures can help quickly assess QOC for children with ARI. There is an urgent need to invest more in implementation research to identify sustainable and effective interventions to ensure that all children receive high QOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9069,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the WHO standards to assess quality of care for children with acute respiratory infections: findings of a baseline multicentre assessment (CHOICE) in Italy.\",\"authors\":\"Marzia Lazzerini, Massimo Dagnelut, Paolo Dalena, Idanna Sforzi, Maristella Toniutti, Enrico Felici, Silvia Bressan, Gian Luca Trobia, Stefano Martelossi, Riccardo Lubrano, Silvia Fasoli, Federico Marchetti, Andrea Iuorio, Chiara Grisaffi, Silvia Galiazzo, Francesca Patanè, Chiara Stefani, Maria Luisa Casciana, Angela Troisi, Egidio Barbi\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Experience is lacking on the implementation of the WHO standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at facility level. We describe the use of 10 prioritised WHO standard-based quality measures to assess provision of care for children with acute respiratory infections (ARI) in Italy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a multicentre observational study across 11 emergency departments with different characteristics, we collected 10 WHO standard-based quality measures related to case management of children with ARI and no emergency/priority signs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 3145 children were collected. Major differences in QOC across facilities were observed: documentation of saturation level and respiratory rate varied from 34.3% to 100% and from 10.7% to 62.7%, respectively (p<0.001); antibiotic prescription rates ranged from 22.6% to 80.0% (p<0.001), with significant differences in the pattern of prescribed antibiotic; hospitalisations rates ranged between 2.3% and 30.6% (p<0.001). When corrected for children's individual sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the variable more consistently associated with each analysed outcome was the individual facility where the child was managed. Higher rates of antibiotics prescription (+33.1%, p<0.001) and hospitalisation (+24.7%, p<0.001) were observed for facilities in Southern Italy, while university centres were associated with lower hospitalisation rates (-13.1%, p<0.001), independently from children's characteristics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of 10 WHO standard-based measures can help quickly assess QOC for children with ARI. There is an urgent need to invest more in implementation research to identify sustainable and effective interventions to ensure that all children receive high QOC.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Paediatrics Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002552\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Paediatrics Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2024-002552","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在设施层面实施世界卫生组织标准以提高儿童护理质量(QOC)方面缺乏经验。我们介绍了在意大利使用 10 项基于世界卫生组织标准的优先质量措施来评估急性呼吸道感染(ARI)患儿护理工作的情况:在一项多中心观察研究中,我们在 11 个具有不同特点的急诊科收集了 10 项与急性呼吸道感染患儿病例管理相关的世界卫生组织标准质量标准,这些患儿没有急诊/优先征兆。研究进行了单变量和多变量分析:结果:收集了 3145 名儿童的数据。结果:收集到的 3145 名儿童的数据显示,各医疗机构的 QOC 存在较大差异:对饱和度和呼吸频率的记录分别从 34.3% 到 100%,以及从 10.7% 到 62.7% 不等(p 结论:使用 10 项基于世界卫生组织标准的测量方法有助于快速评估急性呼吸道感染患儿的 QOC。当务之急是加大对实施研究的投入,以确定可持续的有效干预措施,确保所有儿童都能获得高QOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of the WHO standards to assess quality of care for children with acute respiratory infections: findings of a baseline multicentre assessment (CHOICE) in Italy.

Background: Experience is lacking on the implementation of the WHO standards for improving the quality of care (QOC) for children at facility level. We describe the use of 10 prioritised WHO standard-based quality measures to assess provision of care for children with acute respiratory infections (ARI) in Italy.

Methods: In a multicentre observational study across 11 emergency departments with different characteristics, we collected 10 WHO standard-based quality measures related to case management of children with ARI and no emergency/priority signs. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted.

Results: Data from 3145 children were collected. Major differences in QOC across facilities were observed: documentation of saturation level and respiratory rate varied from 34.3% to 100% and from 10.7% to 62.7%, respectively (p<0.001); antibiotic prescription rates ranged from 22.6% to 80.0% (p<0.001), with significant differences in the pattern of prescribed antibiotic; hospitalisations rates ranged between 2.3% and 30.6% (p<0.001). When corrected for children's individual sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, the variable more consistently associated with each analysed outcome was the individual facility where the child was managed. Higher rates of antibiotics prescription (+33.1%, p<0.001) and hospitalisation (+24.7%, p<0.001) were observed for facilities in Southern Italy, while university centres were associated with lower hospitalisation rates (-13.1%, p<0.001), independently from children's characteristics.

Conclusions: The use of 10 WHO standard-based measures can help quickly assess QOC for children with ARI. There is an urgent need to invest more in implementation research to identify sustainable and effective interventions to ensure that all children receive high QOC.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Paediatrics Open
BMJ Paediatrics Open Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
124
期刊最新文献
Burden of the COVID-19 pandemic on adolescent mental health in the Lombardy Region, Italy: a retrospective database review. Non-invasive detection of bilirubin concentrations during the first week of life in a low-resource setting along the Thailand-Myanmar border. Prevalence, symptomatology and factors associated with asthma in adolescents aged 13-14 years from rural Sri Lanka: an analytical cross-sectional study. Spatiotemporal analysis of the association between Kawasaki disease incidence and PM2.5 exposure: a nationwide database study in Japan. Infectious acute respiratory failure in patients under 5 years of age: a retrospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1