卫生工作者抗议与 COVID-19 大流行:间断时间序列分析。

IF 8.4 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Bulletin of the World Health Organization Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.2471/BLT.23.290330
Kartik Sharma, Sorcha Brophy, Michael Law, Veena Sriram
{"title":"卫生工作者抗议与 COVID-19 大流行:间断时间序列分析。","authors":"Kartik Sharma, Sorcha Brophy, Michael Law, Veena Sriram","doi":"10.2471/BLT.23.290330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on protests by health workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of data from 159 countries for 2 years before and after the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a pandemic in March 2020, thus between 2018 and 2022. We produced models examining two main outcomes: (i) the total weekly number of health worker protests globally; and (ii) the number of countries with one or more health worker protests in a given week.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, there were 18 322 health worker protests in 133 countries between 2018 and 2022. The number of weekly health worker protests globally increased by 47% (30.1/63.5), an increase of 30.1 protests per week (95% confidence interval, CI: 11.7-48.6) at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the number of countries experiencing such protests in a given week increased by 24% (5.7/24.1) following the declaration of the pandemic (an increase of 5.7 countries; 95% CI: 3.5-7.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic increased the overall level of health worker protests globally as well as the number of countries experiencing such protests. These protests highlight discontent in the health workforce. Given the ongoing global health workforce crisis, understanding and addressing the drivers of health worker discontent is important for global health policy and security.</p>","PeriodicalId":9465,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","volume":"102 9","pages":"650-656"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health worker protests and the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Kartik Sharma, Sorcha Brophy, Michael Law, Veena Sriram\",\"doi\":\"10.2471/BLT.23.290330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on protests by health workers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of data from 159 countries for 2 years before and after the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a pandemic in March 2020, thus between 2018 and 2022. We produced models examining two main outcomes: (i) the total weekly number of health worker protests globally; and (ii) the number of countries with one or more health worker protests in a given week.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>In total, there were 18 322 health worker protests in 133 countries between 2018 and 2022. The number of weekly health worker protests globally increased by 47% (30.1/63.5), an increase of 30.1 protests per week (95% confidence interval, CI: 11.7-48.6) at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the number of countries experiencing such protests in a given week increased by 24% (5.7/24.1) following the declaration of the pandemic (an increase of 5.7 countries; 95% CI: 3.5-7.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The pandemic increased the overall level of health worker protests globally as well as the number of countries experiencing such protests. These protests highlight discontent in the health workforce. Given the ongoing global health workforce crisis, understanding and addressing the drivers of health worker discontent is important for global health policy and security.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9465,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"volume\":\"102 9\",\"pages\":\"650-656\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362691/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the World Health Organization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290330\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the World Health Organization","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.23.290330","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对卫生工作者抗议活动的影响:评估 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对卫生工作者抗议活动的影响:我们对世界卫生组织于 2020 年 3 月将 COVID-19 列为大流行病前后两年(即 2018 年至 2022 年)159 个国家的数据进行了间断时间序列分析。我们建立了两个主要结果模型:(i) 全球每周卫生工作者抗议活动的总数;(ii) 在某一周内发生一次或多次卫生工作者抗议活动的国家数量:2018 年至 2022 年期间,133 个国家共发生了 18 322 次卫生工作者抗议活动。在 COVID-19 大流行开始时,全球每周卫生工作者抗议活动的数量增加了 47%(30.1/63.5),每周抗议活动增加了 30.1 次(95% 置信区间,CI:11.7-48.6)。此外,疫情宣布后,一周内发生此类抗议活动的国家数量增加了 24%(5.7/24.1)(增加了 5.7 个国家;95% 置信区间:3.5-7.8):结论:大流行病增加了全球医务工作者抗议的总体水平,也增加了发生此类抗议的国家数量。这些抗议凸显了医务工作者的不满情绪。鉴于全球卫生工作者队伍的危机仍在持续,了解和解决卫生工作者不满情绪的驱动因素对全球卫生政策和安全非常重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health worker protests and the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Objective: To assess the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on protests by health workers.

Methods: We conducted an interrupted time series analysis of data from 159 countries for 2 years before and after the World Health Organization classified COVID-19 as a pandemic in March 2020, thus between 2018 and 2022. We produced models examining two main outcomes: (i) the total weekly number of health worker protests globally; and (ii) the number of countries with one or more health worker protests in a given week.

Findings: In total, there were 18 322 health worker protests in 133 countries between 2018 and 2022. The number of weekly health worker protests globally increased by 47% (30.1/63.5), an increase of 30.1 protests per week (95% confidence interval, CI: 11.7-48.6) at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the number of countries experiencing such protests in a given week increased by 24% (5.7/24.1) following the declaration of the pandemic (an increase of 5.7 countries; 95% CI: 3.5-7.8).

Conclusion: The pandemic increased the overall level of health worker protests globally as well as the number of countries experiencing such protests. These protests highlight discontent in the health workforce. Given the ongoing global health workforce crisis, understanding and addressing the drivers of health worker discontent is important for global health policy and security.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the World Health Organization
Bulletin of the World Health Organization 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
0.90%
发文量
317
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Bulletin of the World Health Organization Journal Overview: Leading public health journal Peer-reviewed monthly journal Special focus on developing countries Global scope and authority Top public and environmental health journal Impact factor of 6.818 (2018), according to Web of Science ranking Audience: Essential reading for public health decision-makers and researchers Provides blend of research, well-informed opinion, and news
期刊最新文献
A health system assessment approach to analysis of political parties' health proposals, Portugal. Barriers to WHO prequalification of similar biotherapeutic insulin. Behaviour of motorcyclists and bicyclists before and after a road safety campaign, China. Inequalities in geographical access to emergency obstetric and newborn care. Legal changes and evidence on unmet need for contraception, Philippines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1