甲状腺 FNA 的诊断效果:白俄罗斯国家甲状腺癌转诊中心的经验。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Diagnostic Cytopathology Pub Date : 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1002/dc.25391
Siarhei U Yakubouski, Henadz H Kandratsenka, Michael V Fridman, Viktor A Kondratovich, Olga A Perkhova
{"title":"甲状腺 FNA 的诊断效果:白俄罗斯国家甲状腺癌转诊中心的经验。","authors":"Siarhei U Yakubouski, Henadz H Kandratsenka, Michael V Fridman, Viktor A Kondratovich, Olga A Perkhova","doi":"10.1002/dc.25391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is a basic procedure to verify the morphology of thyroid nodules. However, significant variations in the diagnostic performance of FNA, as well as fluctuations in the rate of malignancy (ROM) in different categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, have been discovered in many studies. The development and employment of additional molecular tests in daily clinical practice require an understanding of the prevalence and structure of thyroid malignancy in each category of the Bethesda system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Current research is a continuous retrospective cohort study of the results of the examination and treatment of 1652 patients with thyroid tumors who have undergone primary surgery in 2021 at a national referral thyroid cancer center. FNA diagnostic performance was studied by comparing cytological diagnoses with histological outcomes. The authors evaluated ROM in each Bethesda category and identified the tumors representing a diagnostic pitfall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall ROM was 72.4%. When considering ROM in each Bethesda category, it was 16.7% in Bethesda I, 10.1% in Bethesda II, 23.0% in Bethesda IV, 74.8% in Bethesda V, 99.4% in Bethesda VI. The false-positive rate was 65.0%, false negative-0.67%. Follicular and oncocytic adenomas, as well as the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer, were the most troublesome entities for patients' management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROM was comparable to the values implied by the Bethesda system. Follicular tumors were the main source of high false-positive rates. This necessitates the refinement of existing tests and the development of new diagnostic tests to overcome the abovementioned problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid FNA: Experience of Belarusian National Referral Thyroid Cancer Center.\",\"authors\":\"Siarhei U Yakubouski, Henadz H Kandratsenka, Michael V Fridman, Viktor A Kondratovich, Olga A Perkhova\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dc.25391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is a basic procedure to verify the morphology of thyroid nodules. However, significant variations in the diagnostic performance of FNA, as well as fluctuations in the rate of malignancy (ROM) in different categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, have been discovered in many studies. The development and employment of additional molecular tests in daily clinical practice require an understanding of the prevalence and structure of thyroid malignancy in each category of the Bethesda system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Current research is a continuous retrospective cohort study of the results of the examination and treatment of 1652 patients with thyroid tumors who have undergone primary surgery in 2021 at a national referral thyroid cancer center. FNA diagnostic performance was studied by comparing cytological diagnoses with histological outcomes. The authors evaluated ROM in each Bethesda category and identified the tumors representing a diagnostic pitfall.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall ROM was 72.4%. When considering ROM in each Bethesda category, it was 16.7% in Bethesda I, 10.1% in Bethesda II, 23.0% in Bethesda IV, 74.8% in Bethesda V, 99.4% in Bethesda VI. The false-positive rate was 65.0%, false negative-0.67%. Follicular and oncocytic adenomas, as well as the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer, were the most troublesome entities for patients' management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROM was comparable to the values implied by the Bethesda system. Follicular tumors were the main source of high false-positive rates. This necessitates the refinement of existing tests and the development of new diagnostic tests to overcome the abovementioned problems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11349,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostic Cytopathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25391\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25391","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:细针穿刺活检(FNA)是验证甲状腺结节形态的基本方法。然而,在许多研究中发现,FNA 的诊断效果存在很大差异,而且在贝塞斯达甲状腺细胞病理学报告系统的不同类别中,恶性率(ROM)也存在波动。要在日常临床实践中开发和使用更多的分子检验方法,就必须了解贝塞斯达系统中各类甲状腺恶性肿瘤的发病率和结构:目前的研究是一项连续的回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2021年在一家国家级甲状腺癌转诊中心接受初治手术的1652名甲状腺肿瘤患者的检查和治疗结果。通过比较细胞学诊断和组织学结果,研究了 FNA 的诊断性能。作者评估了每个贝塞斯达类别的ROM,并确定了代表诊断陷阱的肿瘤:结果:总体ROM为72.4%。如果考虑到每个贝塞斯达类别的 ROM,贝塞斯达 I 级为 16.7%,贝塞斯达 II 级为 10.1%,贝塞斯达 IV 级为 23.0%,贝塞斯达 V 级为 74.8%,贝塞斯达 VI 级为 99.4%。假阳性率为 65.0%,假阴性率为 0.67%。滤泡性腺瘤和肿瘤性腺瘤以及甲状腺乳头状癌的滤泡变异型是患者管理中最棘手的实体:ROM与贝塞斯达系统所暗示的数值相当。滤泡性肿瘤是假阳性率高的主要原因。因此,有必要改进现有检测方法并开发新的诊断检测方法,以克服上述问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diagnostic Performance of Thyroid FNA: Experience of Belarusian National Referral Thyroid Cancer Center.

Background: A fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy is a basic procedure to verify the morphology of thyroid nodules. However, significant variations in the diagnostic performance of FNA, as well as fluctuations in the rate of malignancy (ROM) in different categories of the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, have been discovered in many studies. The development and employment of additional molecular tests in daily clinical practice require an understanding of the prevalence and structure of thyroid malignancy in each category of the Bethesda system.

Methods: Current research is a continuous retrospective cohort study of the results of the examination and treatment of 1652 patients with thyroid tumors who have undergone primary surgery in 2021 at a national referral thyroid cancer center. FNA diagnostic performance was studied by comparing cytological diagnoses with histological outcomes. The authors evaluated ROM in each Bethesda category and identified the tumors representing a diagnostic pitfall.

Results: The overall ROM was 72.4%. When considering ROM in each Bethesda category, it was 16.7% in Bethesda I, 10.1% in Bethesda II, 23.0% in Bethesda IV, 74.8% in Bethesda V, 99.4% in Bethesda VI. The false-positive rate was 65.0%, false negative-0.67%. Follicular and oncocytic adenomas, as well as the follicular variant of papillary thyroid cancer, were the most troublesome entities for patients' management.

Conclusion: ROM was comparable to the values implied by the Bethesda system. Follicular tumors were the main source of high false-positive rates. This necessitates the refinement of existing tests and the development of new diagnostic tests to overcome the abovementioned problems.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
期刊最新文献
From sampling to cellblock: The fully automated journey of cytological specimens. Reproducibility assessment of WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology: A single institution experience. Cytological diagnosis of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma with a unique pattern of D2-40 immunoexpression. THADA-IGF2BP3 gene fusions in thyroid fine needle aspiration is involved in the pathway to "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features". Extracranial metastasis from a frontal embryonal tumor to the parotid: Cytomorphologic features of a rare occurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1