心肌缺血综合征:协调不断发展的国际临床实践指南的新术语。

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-09-29 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae278
William E Boden, Raffaele De Caterina, Juan Carlos Kaski, Noel Bairey Merz, Colin Berry, Mario Marzilli, Carl J Pepine, Emanuele Barbato, Giulio Stefanini, Eva Prescott, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Deepak L Bhatt, Joseph A Hill, Filippo Crea
{"title":"心肌缺血综合征:协调不断发展的国际临床实践指南的新术语。","authors":"William E Boden, Raffaele De Caterina, Juan Carlos Kaski, Noel Bairey Merz, Colin Berry, Mario Marzilli, Carl J Pepine, Emanuele Barbato, Giulio Stefanini, Eva Prescott, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Deepak L Bhatt, Joseph A Hill, Filippo Crea","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-e.g. 'stable coronary artery disease' (CAD), 'stable ischaemic heart disease', and 'chronic coronary syndromes' (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with 'acute coronary syndromes' (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term 'chronic coronary disease'. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms 'coronary' and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of 'acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes' and 'non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes', which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Myocardial ischaemic syndromes: a new nomenclature to harmonize evolving international clinical practice guidelines.\",\"authors\":\"William E Boden, Raffaele De Caterina, Juan Carlos Kaski, Noel Bairey Merz, Colin Berry, Mario Marzilli, Carl J Pepine, Emanuele Barbato, Giulio Stefanini, Eva Prescott, Philippe Gabriel Steg, Deepak L Bhatt, Joseph A Hill, Filippo Crea\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-e.g. 'stable coronary artery disease' (CAD), 'stable ischaemic heart disease', and 'chronic coronary syndromes' (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with 'acute coronary syndromes' (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term 'chronic coronary disease'. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms 'coronary' and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of 'acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes' and 'non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes', which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":37.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae278\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae278","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自 20 世纪 60 年代以来,心脏病学家对急性心肌梗死(MI)采用了多种二元分类系统,从而改善了对患者的管理。相反,对于心肌缺血的慢性稳定表现,随着时间的推移出现了各种分类,术语往往相互冲突,例如 "稳定型冠状动脉疾病"(CAD)、"稳定型缺血性心脏病 "和 "慢性冠状动脉综合征"(CCS)。2019 年欧洲指南引入了 CCS,使其与 "急性冠状动脉综合征"(ACS)对称,而 2023 年美国指南则认可了 "慢性冠状动脉疾病 "这一替代术语。这些相互竞争的分类方法带来了一个意想不到的后果,那就是 "冠状动脉 "和 "疾病 "这两个限制性术语的长期存在,往往只意味着单一的阻塞性 CAD 机制。现在,重要的是为心绞痛和心肌缺血的阻塞性和非阻塞性原因提供一个更具广泛包容性的术语,以促进概念的清晰性,并统一各指南中的非同步命名。因此,我们提出了一种新的二元分类法,即 "急性心肌缺血综合征 "和 "非急性心肌缺血综合征",其中包括阻塞性心外膜和非阻塞性致病机制,包括微血管功能障碍、血管痉挛性疾病和非冠状动脉原因。在此,我们保留了公认的 ACS、ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死等类别,将其作为重要的子集,对于这些子集,血管重建已被证实具有临床益处,同时还保留了缺血和非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死等新术语。总之,这种更全面的术语能更好地调整、统一和协调心肌缺血的不同病理生理原因,并能针对心绞痛、缺血和梗死的多种病理生理诱因制定更精细的诊断和治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Myocardial ischaemic syndromes: a new nomenclature to harmonize evolving international clinical practice guidelines.

Since the 1960s, cardiologists have adopted several binary classification systems for acute myocardial infarction (MI) that facilitated improved patient management. Conversely, for chronic stable manifestations of myocardial ischaemia, various classifications have emerged over time, often with conflicting terminology-e.g. 'stable coronary artery disease' (CAD), 'stable ischaemic heart disease', and 'chronic coronary syndromes' (CCS). While the 2019 European guidelines introduced CCS to impart symmetry with 'acute coronary syndromes' (ACS), the 2023 American guidelines endorsed the alternative term 'chronic coronary disease'. An unintended consequence of these competing classifications is perpetuation of the restrictive terms 'coronary' and 'disease', often connoting only a singular obstructive CAD mechanism. It is now important to advance a more broadly inclusive terminology for both obstructive and non-obstructive causes of angina and myocardial ischaemia that fosters conceptual clarity and unifies dyssynchronous nomenclatures across guidelines. We, therefore, propose a new binary classification of 'acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes' and 'non-acute myocardial ischaemic syndromes', which comprises both obstructive epicardial and non-obstructive pathogenetic mechanisms, including microvascular dysfunction, vasospastic disorders, and non-coronary causes. We herein retain accepted categories of ACS, ST-segment elevation MI, and non-ST-segment elevation MI, as important subsets for which revascularization is of proven clinical benefit, as well as new terms like ischaemia and MI with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Overall, such a more encompassing nomenclature better aligns, unifies, and harmonizes different pathophysiologic causes of myocardial ischaemia and should result in more refined diagnostic and therapeutic approaches targeted to the multiple pathobiological precipitants of angina pectoris, ischaemia and infarction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in low-risk tricuspid or bicuspid aortic stenosis: the NOTION-2 trial. Loop diuretic therapy with or without heart failure: impact on prognosis. Lumican promotes calcific aortic valve disease through H3 histone lactylation. Weekly Journal Scan: a 'thousand-mile' journey in obesity-related heart failure treatment begins with a few STEPs. Intracoronary polarimetric signatures of exercise-induced vasospastic angina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1