多语言噪声中数字(DIN)测试:开发与评估。

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY International Journal of Audiology Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068
Marcin Masalski, Krzysztof Morawski
{"title":"多语言噪声中数字(DIN)测试:开发与评估。","authors":"Marcin Masalski, Krzysztof Morawski","doi":"10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a methodologically uniform digits-in-noise (DIN) test in 17 different languages.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The DIN test was developed for Android devices as an extension to the open-access Hearing Test<sup>™</sup> app, available on the Google Play store. It utilised professionally recorded female speech, speech-shaped noise, a digit scoring method and a variable step size. The test was adaptively optimised and evaluated as the results of tests taken online by users of the app became available.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Optimisation using 35,534 ears, evaluation using 6012 ears.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimisation improved the slopes of the psychometric functions for all languages by an average of 6.8%/dB. Evaluation included calculation of normative speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and estimation of test-retest standard deviations. Normative values for SRTs ranged from -14.2 dB SNR (95% CI -14.3 to -14.0) for Chinese to -11.2 dB SNR (95% CI -11.3 to -11.1) for Japanese, with reliability estimates ranging from 0.48 dB (95% CI 0.36-0.64) for Portuguese to 0.91 dB (95% CI 0.73-1.21) for Romanian.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimisation of each language version was confirmed by the improvement in the slopes of the psychometric functions. The normative values obtained from the test evaluation were in agreement with literature data.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Science Support Centre of Wroclaw Medical University BW-59/2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":13759,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The multilingual digits-in-noise (DIN) test: development and evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Marcin Masalski, Krzysztof Morawski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a methodologically uniform digits-in-noise (DIN) test in 17 different languages.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The DIN test was developed for Android devices as an extension to the open-access Hearing Test<sup>™</sup> app, available on the Google Play store. It utilised professionally recorded female speech, speech-shaped noise, a digit scoring method and a variable step size. The test was adaptively optimised and evaluated as the results of tests taken online by users of the app became available.</p><p><strong>Study sample: </strong>Optimisation using 35,534 ears, evaluation using 6012 ears.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Optimisation improved the slopes of the psychometric functions for all languages by an average of 6.8%/dB. Evaluation included calculation of normative speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and estimation of test-retest standard deviations. Normative values for SRTs ranged from -14.2 dB SNR (95% CI -14.3 to -14.0) for Chinese to -11.2 dB SNR (95% CI -11.3 to -11.1) for Japanese, with reliability estimates ranging from 0.48 dB (95% CI 0.36-0.64) for Portuguese to 0.91 dB (95% CI 0.73-1.21) for Romanian.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The optimisation of each language version was confirmed by the improvement in the slopes of the psychometric functions. The normative values obtained from the test evaluation were in agreement with literature data.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Science Support Centre of Wroclaw Medical University BW-59/2020.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-11\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2024.2397068","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标用 17 种不同的语言开发一种方法统一的噪声中数字(DIN)测试:DIN测试是为安卓设备开发的,是对谷歌Play商店中开放的Hearing Test™应用程序的扩展。它采用了专业录制的女性语音、语音噪声、数字评分法和可变步长。随着应用程序用户在线测试结果的公布,该测试进行了自适应优化和评估:研究样本:使用 35534 只耳朵进行优化,使用 6012 只耳朵进行评估:结果:优化后,所有语言的心理测量函数斜率平均提高了 6.8%/dB。评估包括计算标准语音接收阈值 (SRT) 和估计测试-再测试标准偏差。SRT 的标准值从中文的 -14.2 dB SNR(95% CI -14.3 至 -14.0)到日文的 -11.2 dB SNR(95% CI -11.3 至 -11.1)不等,可靠性估计值从葡萄牙文的 0.48 dB(95% CI 0.36 至 0.64)到罗马尼亚文的 0.91 dB(95% CI 0.73 至 1.21)不等:心理测量函数斜率的改善证实了每种语言版本的优化。从测试评估中获得的标准值与文献数据一致:试验注册:弗罗茨瓦夫医科大学科学支持中心 BW-59/2020。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The multilingual digits-in-noise (DIN) test: development and evaluation.

Objective: To develop a methodologically uniform digits-in-noise (DIN) test in 17 different languages.

Design: The DIN test was developed for Android devices as an extension to the open-access Hearing Test app, available on the Google Play store. It utilised professionally recorded female speech, speech-shaped noise, a digit scoring method and a variable step size. The test was adaptively optimised and evaluated as the results of tests taken online by users of the app became available.

Study sample: Optimisation using 35,534 ears, evaluation using 6012 ears.

Results: Optimisation improved the slopes of the psychometric functions for all languages by an average of 6.8%/dB. Evaluation included calculation of normative speech reception thresholds (SRTs) and estimation of test-retest standard deviations. Normative values for SRTs ranged from -14.2 dB SNR (95% CI -14.3 to -14.0) for Chinese to -11.2 dB SNR (95% CI -11.3 to -11.1) for Japanese, with reliability estimates ranging from 0.48 dB (95% CI 0.36-0.64) for Portuguese to 0.91 dB (95% CI 0.73-1.21) for Romanian.

Conclusions: The optimisation of each language version was confirmed by the improvement in the slopes of the psychometric functions. The normative values obtained from the test evaluation were in agreement with literature data.

Trial registration: Science Support Centre of Wroclaw Medical University BW-59/2020.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Audiology
International Journal of Audiology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
14.80%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Audiology is committed to furthering development of a scientifically robust evidence base for audiology. The journal is published by the British Society of Audiology, the International Society of Audiology and the Nordic Audiological Society.
期刊最新文献
The influence of age and hearing loss on thresholds measured using the TFS-AF test. Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing. "Can physical activity reduce the risk of having tinnitus?" Risky leisure noise exposure during the transition to adulthood and the impact of major life events - results of the OHRKAN cohort study. Applications of automatic speech recognition and text-to-speech technologies for hearing assessment: a scoping review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1