7 T 腰骶丛神经造影术:脊髓神经可视化的可行性及与 3 T MRI 的比较。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001113
Adrian A Marth, Georg Constantin Feuerriegel, Florian Wanivenhaus, Daniel Nanz, Reto Sutter
{"title":"7 T 腰骶丛神经造影术:脊髓神经可视化的可行性及与 3 T MRI 的比较。","authors":"Adrian A Marth, Georg Constantin Feuerriegel, Florian Wanivenhaus, Daniel Nanz, Reto Sutter","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>7 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can offer superior spatial resolution compared with lower field strengths. However, its use for imaging of the lumbosacral plexus has been constrained by technical challenges and therefore remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, this study investigated the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography by means of comparing the visibility of the spinal nerves and image quality to 3 T MR neurography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this monocentric, institutional review board-approved, prospective study, 30 healthy subjects underwent acquisition time-matched 7 T MR neurography and 3 T MR neurography of the lumbar spine using a 3-dimensional dual-echo steady-state sequence. Visibility of the nerve root, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles of L1-S1, along with image artifacts and overall image quality, were compared between the different field strengths by 2 radiologists using 4-point Likert scales (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Comparisons between field strengths were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and interobserver agreement was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 T MR neurography enabled significantly improved visualization of the lumbar nerve roots, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles (P ≤ 0.002). Compared with 3 T MR neurography, no difference in overall image quality was observed (P = 0.211), although 7 T MR imaging exhibited significantly increased image artifacts (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement (κ) for qualitative measures ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 for 7 T, and from 0.75 to 0.91 for 3 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>7 T MR neurography allowed for improved visualization of lumbar spinal nerves, whereas overall image quality was comparable to 3 T MR neurography. This supports the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus, even though image artifacts at 7 T were significantly increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"7 T Lumbosacral Plexus Neurography: Feasibility and Comparison of Spinal Nerve Visualization With 3 T MRI.\",\"authors\":\"Adrian A Marth, Georg Constantin Feuerriegel, Florian Wanivenhaus, Daniel Nanz, Reto Sutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>7 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can offer superior spatial resolution compared with lower field strengths. However, its use for imaging of the lumbosacral plexus has been constrained by technical challenges and therefore remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, this study investigated the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography by means of comparing the visibility of the spinal nerves and image quality to 3 T MR neurography.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this monocentric, institutional review board-approved, prospective study, 30 healthy subjects underwent acquisition time-matched 7 T MR neurography and 3 T MR neurography of the lumbar spine using a 3-dimensional dual-echo steady-state sequence. Visibility of the nerve root, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles of L1-S1, along with image artifacts and overall image quality, were compared between the different field strengths by 2 radiologists using 4-point Likert scales (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Comparisons between field strengths were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and interobserver agreement was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>7 T MR neurography enabled significantly improved visualization of the lumbar nerve roots, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles (P ≤ 0.002). Compared with 3 T MR neurography, no difference in overall image quality was observed (P = 0.211), although 7 T MR imaging exhibited significantly increased image artifacts (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement (κ) for qualitative measures ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 for 7 T, and from 0.75 to 0.91 for 3 T.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>7 T MR neurography allowed for improved visualization of lumbar spinal nerves, whereas overall image quality was comparable to 3 T MR neurography. This supports the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus, even though image artifacts at 7 T were significantly increased.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001113\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001113","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:与较低的磁场强度相比,7 T 磁共振成像具有更高的空间分辨率。然而,将其用于腰骶神经丛成像一直受到技术难题的限制,因此相对来说仍未得到探索。因此,本研究通过比较脊神经的可见度和图像质量与 3 T MR 神经造影,研究 7 T MR 神经造影的可行性:在这项经机构审查委员会批准的单中心前瞻性研究中,30 名健康受试者使用三维双回波稳态序列对腰椎进行了采集时间匹配的 7 T MR 神经影像学检查和 3 T MR 神经影像学检查。两名放射科医生使用 4 点李克特量表(1 = 差,4 = 优)比较了不同场强下 L1-S1 神经根、背根神经节和脊神经束的可见度、图像伪影和整体图像质量。采用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验对不同场强进行比较,并评估观察者之间的一致性:结果:7 T 磁共振神经成像可显著提高腰神经根、背根神经节和脊神经束的可视性(P ≤ 0.002)。与 3 T MR 神经造影相比,虽然 7 T MR 成像显示的图像伪影明显增加(P < 0.001),但总体图像质量未见差异(P = 0.211)。定性测量的观察者间一致性(κ)为:7 T 0.71 至 0.88,3 T 0.75 至 0.91:结论:7 T MR 神经造影可改善腰椎神经的可视化,而整体图像质量与 3 T MR 神经造影相当。这支持了腰骶丛 7 T 磁共振神经成像的可行性,尽管 7 T 的图像伪影明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
7 T Lumbosacral Plexus Neurography: Feasibility and Comparison of Spinal Nerve Visualization With 3 T MRI.

Objectives: 7 T magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can offer superior spatial resolution compared with lower field strengths. However, its use for imaging of the lumbosacral plexus has been constrained by technical challenges and therefore remained relatively unexplored. Therefore, this study investigated the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography by means of comparing the visibility of the spinal nerves and image quality to 3 T MR neurography.

Materials and methods: In this monocentric, institutional review board-approved, prospective study, 30 healthy subjects underwent acquisition time-matched 7 T MR neurography and 3 T MR neurography of the lumbar spine using a 3-dimensional dual-echo steady-state sequence. Visibility of the nerve root, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles of L1-S1, along with image artifacts and overall image quality, were compared between the different field strengths by 2 radiologists using 4-point Likert scales (1 = poor, 4 = excellent). Comparisons between field strengths were made using the Wilcoxon signed rank test, and interobserver agreement was assessed.

Results: 7 T MR neurography enabled significantly improved visualization of the lumbar nerve roots, dorsal root ganglia, and spinal nerve fascicles (P ≤ 0.002). Compared with 3 T MR neurography, no difference in overall image quality was observed (P = 0.211), although 7 T MR imaging exhibited significantly increased image artifacts (P < 0.001). Interobserver agreement (κ) for qualitative measures ranged from 0.71 to 0.88 for 7 T, and from 0.75 to 0.91 for 3 T.

Conclusions: 7 T MR neurography allowed for improved visualization of lumbar spinal nerves, whereas overall image quality was comparable to 3 T MR neurography. This supports the feasibility of 7 T MR neurography of the lumbosacral plexus, even though image artifacts at 7 T were significantly increased.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
期刊最新文献
Deep Learning Reconstructed New-Generation 0.55 T MRI of the Knee-A Prospective Comparison With Conventional 3 T MRI. Free-Breathing High-Resolution, Swap-Free, and Motion-Corrected Water/Fat Separation in Pediatric Abdominal MRI. Relationship of Dose and Signal Enhancement Properties of Gadoquatrane, a New Tetrameric, Macrocyclic Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent, Compared With Gadobutrol: A Randomized Crossover Study in Healthy Adults. Metabolic MRI With Hyperpolarized 13 C-Pyruvate for Early Detection of Fibrogenic Kidney Metabolism. Dedicated Photon-Counting CT for Detection and Classification of Microcalcifications: An Intraindividual Comparison With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1