无法切除的肝细胞癌患者在使用前一种免疫检查点抑制剂治疗进展后,对durvalumab加tremelimumab的治疗反应。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Investigational New Drugs Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y
Nami Mori, Nobuharu Tamaki, Shintaro Takaki, Keiji Tsuji, Toshifumi Tada, Shinichiro Nakamura, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Masao Doisaki, Hiroyuki Marusawa, Haruhiko Kobashi, Hideki Fujii, Chikara Ogawa, Michiko Nonogi, Hirotaka Arai, Yasushi Uchida, Naohito Urawa, Ryoichi Narita, Takehiro Akahane, Masahiko Kondo, Yutaka Yasui, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Namiki Izumi, Masayuki Kurosaki
{"title":"无法切除的肝细胞癌患者在使用前一种免疫检查点抑制剂治疗进展后,对durvalumab加tremelimumab的治疗反应。","authors":"Nami Mori, Nobuharu Tamaki, Shintaro Takaki, Keiji Tsuji, Toshifumi Tada, Shinichiro Nakamura, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Masao Doisaki, Hiroyuki Marusawa, Haruhiko Kobashi, Hideki Fujii, Chikara Ogawa, Michiko Nonogi, Hirotaka Arai, Yasushi Uchida, Naohito Urawa, Ryoichi Narita, Takehiro Akahane, Masahiko Kondo, Yutaka Yasui, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Namiki Izumi, Masayuki Kurosaki","doi":"10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":14513,"journal":{"name":"Investigational New Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.\",\"authors\":\"Nami Mori, Nobuharu Tamaki, Shintaro Takaki, Keiji Tsuji, Toshifumi Tada, Shinichiro Nakamura, Hironori Ochi, Toshie Mashiba, Masao Doisaki, Hiroyuki Marusawa, Haruhiko Kobashi, Hideki Fujii, Chikara Ogawa, Michiko Nonogi, Hirotaka Arai, Yasushi Uchida, Naohito Urawa, Ryoichi Narita, Takehiro Akahane, Masahiko Kondo, Yutaka Yasui, Kaoru Tsuchiya, Namiki Izumi, Masayuki Kurosaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigational New Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigational New Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigational New Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-024-01470-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)可用于治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC),但目前尚不清楚ICI序贯治疗--在阿特珠单抗加贝伐单抗(AB)治疗进展后的durvalumab加tremelimumab(DT)--对HCC是否有效。在这项全国性多中心研究中,我们旨在根据治疗时机调查DT治疗的效果。共有 85 名患者接受了 DT 治疗。主要终点是接受一线 DT 治疗的患者、接受二线或二线以上治疗但之前未接受 AB 治疗的患者以及接受二线或二线以上治疗但之前接受 AB 治疗的患者在第 8 周时的治疗反应。接受一线治疗、未接受 AB 治疗的二线治疗和接受二线治疗且之前接受过 AB 治疗的患者的客观反应率(ORR)分别为 44%、54% 和 5%(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treatment response to durvalumab plus tremelimumab after progression with previous immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are used for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is unclear whether sequential ICI treatment-durvalumab plus tremelimumab (DT) after progression on atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (AB)-is effective for HCC. In this nationwide multicenter study, we aimed to investigate the effect of DT treatment based on the timing of treatment. A total of 85 patients receiving DT treatment were enrolled. The primary endpoint is treatment response at week 8 among patients receiving first-line DT treatment, those receiving second-line or later treatment without prior AB therapy, and those receiving second-line or later treatment with prior AB therapy. Objective response rates (ORRs) in patients with first-line treatment, second-line treatment without AB, and second-line treatment with prior AB were 44%, 54%, and 5%, respectively (p < 0.001). Similarly, disease control rates (DCRs) were 69%, 91%, and 26%, respectively (p < 0.001). ORR and DCR were significantly lower in patients with prior AB treatment. Progression free survival (PFS) was significantly shortened in patients receiving second-line therapy following prior AB treatment and an adjusted hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) in those patients for PFS, using first-line therapy as a reference, was 2.35 (1.1-5.1, p = 0.03). In conclusion, the impact of DT sequencing following AB treatment was limited. However, even after second-line treatment, the treatment effect can be equivalent to that of first-line treatment in cases with no history of AB treatment. Thus, prior treatment history should be taken into account when initiating DT treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
121
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The development of new anticancer agents is one of the most rapidly changing aspects of cancer research. Investigational New Drugs provides a forum for the rapid dissemination of information on new anticancer agents. The papers published are of interest to the medical chemist, toxicologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, biostatistician and clinical oncologist. Investigational New Drugs provides the fastest possible publication of new discoveries and results for the whole community of scientists developing anticancer agents.
期刊最新文献
Phase II trial of multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor ESK981 in combination with PD-1 inhibitor nivolumab in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Modernizing the assessment and reporting of adverse events in oncology clinical trials using complementary statistical approaches: a case study of the MOTIVATE trial. A phase II study of ME2136 (Asenapine Maleate) plus standard antiemetic therapy for patients, including diabetic patients, receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Anti-ovarian cancer migration and toxicity characteristics of a platinum(IV) pro-drug with axial HDAC inhibitor ligands in zebrafish models. Unraveling the potential biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1