William Taylor Davis, Sterling DeShazo, Nicholas Rossi, Harold Pine
{"title":"网络上有关鼻甲整形术的质量和可读性分析。","authors":"William Taylor Davis, Sterling DeShazo, Nicholas Rossi, Harold Pine","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the quality, credibility, and readability of online health information concerning turbinoplasty, given the increasing reliance on internet resources for health education. Using four search terms related to turbinoplasty, we analyzed 71 text-based webpages from Google.com, Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning-Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Coleman-Liau Index were utilized. Web page quality was computed through the DISCERN Instrument (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA), Novel Turbinoplasty Index (NTI), and presence of code certification by Health on The Net (HON). Seventy-one text-based web pages were assessed. Information quality was measured by an average DISCERN score of 47.4±7.40, indicating \"fair\" quality. The average readability was a grade level of 9.7±1.57, notably higher than AMA and NIH recommendations. Of all web pages, only 11 (15.49%) proficiently met all 4 listed JAMA criteria. Significant correlations between web page classification and average DISCERN (P=0.0042), as well as JAMA score (P<0.001) were discovered. The web pages that had HON code certification revealed significantly higher quality metrics such as DISCERN scores (P<0.001), JAMA scores (P<0.001), and NTI scores (P=0.038). Online health information for turbinoplasty is of \"fair\" quality, and the average readability is several grade levels above current AMA and NIH recommendations. Health care providers should aim to guide their patients on finding appropriate educational resources and should improve the readability of their patient education materials.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality and Readability Analysis of Turbinoplasty on the Web.\",\"authors\":\"William Taylor Davis, Sterling DeShazo, Nicholas Rossi, Harold Pine\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010511\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to assess the quality, credibility, and readability of online health information concerning turbinoplasty, given the increasing reliance on internet resources for health education. Using four search terms related to turbinoplasty, we analyzed 71 text-based webpages from Google.com, Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning-Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Coleman-Liau Index were utilized. Web page quality was computed through the DISCERN Instrument (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA), Novel Turbinoplasty Index (NTI), and presence of code certification by Health on The Net (HON). Seventy-one text-based web pages were assessed. Information quality was measured by an average DISCERN score of 47.4±7.40, indicating \\\"fair\\\" quality. The average readability was a grade level of 9.7±1.57, notably higher than AMA and NIH recommendations. Of all web pages, only 11 (15.49%) proficiently met all 4 listed JAMA criteria. Significant correlations between web page classification and average DISCERN (P=0.0042), as well as JAMA score (P<0.001) were discovered. The web pages that had HON code certification revealed significantly higher quality metrics such as DISCERN scores (P<0.001), JAMA scores (P<0.001), and NTI scores (P=0.038). Online health information for turbinoplasty is of \\\"fair\\\" quality, and the average readability is several grade levels above current AMA and NIH recommendations. Health care providers should aim to guide their patients on finding appropriate educational resources and should improve the readability of their patient education materials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010511\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010511","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估有关鼻甲整形术的在线健康信息的质量、可信度和可读性,因为健康教育越来越依赖于互联网资源。我们使用与鼻甲整形术相关的四个搜索关键词,分析了来自 Google.com、Bing.com 和 Yahoo.com 的 71 个基于文本的网页。我们使用 Flesch-Kincaid 等级、Gunning-Fog 指数、SMOG 指数和 Coleman-Liau 指数对可读性进行了评估。网页质量通过 DISCERN 工具 (DISCERN)、《美国医学会杂志》基准标准 (JAMA)、Novel Turbinoplasty Index (NTI) 和 Health on The Net (HON) 的代码认证进行计算。对 71 个基于文本的网页进行了评估。信息质量以 DISCERN 平均得分为 47.4±7.40,表示质量 "一般"。平均可读性等级为 9.7±1.57,明显高于美国医学会和美国国立卫生研究院的建议。在所有网页中,只有 11 个网页(15.49%)完全符合 JAMA 列出的所有 4 项标准。网页分级与平均 DISCERN(P=0.0042)以及 JAMA 分数(P=0.0042)之间存在显著相关性。
Quality and Readability Analysis of Turbinoplasty on the Web.
This study aimed to assess the quality, credibility, and readability of online health information concerning turbinoplasty, given the increasing reliance on internet resources for health education. Using four search terms related to turbinoplasty, we analyzed 71 text-based webpages from Google.com, Bing.com, and Yahoo.com. Readability was evaluated using the Flesch-Kincaid grade level, Gunning-Fog Index, SMOG Index, and Coleman-Liau Index were utilized. Web page quality was computed through the DISCERN Instrument (DISCERN), the Journal of the American Medical Association benchmark criteria (JAMA), Novel Turbinoplasty Index (NTI), and presence of code certification by Health on The Net (HON). Seventy-one text-based web pages were assessed. Information quality was measured by an average DISCERN score of 47.4±7.40, indicating "fair" quality. The average readability was a grade level of 9.7±1.57, notably higher than AMA and NIH recommendations. Of all web pages, only 11 (15.49%) proficiently met all 4 listed JAMA criteria. Significant correlations between web page classification and average DISCERN (P=0.0042), as well as JAMA score (P<0.001) were discovered. The web pages that had HON code certification revealed significantly higher quality metrics such as DISCERN scores (P<0.001), JAMA scores (P<0.001), and NTI scores (P=0.038). Online health information for turbinoplasty is of "fair" quality, and the average readability is several grade levels above current AMA and NIH recommendations. Health care providers should aim to guide their patients on finding appropriate educational resources and should improve the readability of their patient education materials.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.