MA Holden , M. Murphy , J. Simkins , MJ Thomas , L. Huckfield , JG Quicke , N. Halliday , FN Birrell , B. Borrelli , MJ Callaghan , K. Dziedzic , D. Felson , NE Foster , C. Ingram , C. Jinks , S. Jowett , E. Nicholls , G. Peat
{"title":"膝关节骨性关节炎的膝关节支架:随机对照试验中干预措施的范围界定综述和叙述性综述。","authors":"MA Holden , M. Murphy , J. Simkins , MJ Thomas , L. Huckfield , JG Quicke , N. Halliday , FN Birrell , B. Borrelli , MJ Callaghan , K. Dziedzic , D. Felson , NE Foster , C. Ingram , C. Jinks , S. Jowett , E. Nicholls , G. Peat","doi":"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19654,"journal":{"name":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","volume":"32 11","pages":"Pages 1371-1396"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials\",\"authors\":\"MA Holden , M. Murphy , J. Simkins , MJ Thomas , L. Huckfield , JG Quicke , N. Halliday , FN Birrell , B. Borrelli , MJ Callaghan , K. Dziedzic , D. Felson , NE Foster , C. Ingram , C. Jinks , S. Jowett , E. Nicholls , G. Peat\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.joca.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19654,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"volume\":\"32 11\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1371-1396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424013657\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osteoarthritis and Cartilage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1063458424013657","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的确定并综合膝关节骨性关节炎(OA)随机对照试验(RCT)中膝关节支撑干预措施的内容:在此次范围界定综述中,检索了截至 2024 年 6 月 10 日的三个电子数据库(PubMed、Web of Science 和 Cochrane)。此外,还人工检索了之前关于膝关节支撑治疗膝关节 OA 的 19 篇系统性综述以及最近的 4 份国际临床实践指南。由两名独立审查员对确定的研究进行资格筛选。根据干预措施描述与复制模板(Template for Intervention Description and Replication,TIDieR)指南,从纳入的 RCT 报告中提取有关支撑干预措施的信息。对数据进行综合叙述:结果:共纳入了 31 项测试 47 种不同矫治干预措施的 RCT。支具大致分为外翻/内翻、髌股关节、套筒、中性铰链或对照/安慰剂膝关节支具。护具制造商和型号各不相同,推荐使用的护具数量也不尽相同。只有三项干预措施专门针对支架的依从性。有关支具提供者、环境、治疗次数以及干预措施随时间推移而改变的信息报告很少。有 32 项(68%)干预措施介绍了支架使用的依从性,最常见的是通过自我报告。研究人员提出了膝部支撑的几种作用机制,大致分为生物力学、神经肌肉和心理学三类:结论:针对膝关节 OA 测试了许多不同的膝关节护具干预措施,提出了几种作用机制,但缺乏对依从性的关注,也缺乏全面的报告。这些问题可能是导致迄今为止关于膝关节支撑治疗膝关节OA临床效果的研究结果不一和指南建议不一致的原因。
Knee braces for knee osteoarthritis: A scoping review and narrative synthesis of interventions in randomised controlled trials
Objective
To identify and synthesise the content of knee bracing interventions in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of knee osteoarthritis (OA).
Design
In this scoping review, three electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane) were searched up to 10th June 2024. Nineteen previous systematic reviews of knee bracing for knee OA and four recent international clinical practice guidelines were also hand searched. Identified studies were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Information on bracing interventions was extracted from included RCT reports, informed by Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) guidelines. Data were synthesised narratively.
Results
Thirty-one RCTs testing 47 different bracing interventions were included. Braces were broadly grouped as valgus/varus, patellofemoral, sleeve, neutral hinged, or control/placebo knee braces. Brace manufacturer and models varied, as did amount of recommended brace use. Only three interventions specifically targeted brace adherence. Information on brace providers, setting, number of treatment sessions, and intervention modification over time was poorly reported. Adherence to brace use was described for 32 (68%) interventions, most commonly via self-report. Several mechanisms of action for knee braces were proposed, broadly grouped as biomechanical, neuromuscular, and psychological.
Conclusions
Many different knee brace interventions have been tested for knee OA, with several proposed mechanisms of action, a lack of focus on adherence, and a lack of full reporting. These issues may be contributing to the heterogeneous findings and inconsistent guideline recommendations about the clinical effectiveness of knee bracing for knee OA to date.
期刊介绍:
Osteoarthritis and Cartilage is the official journal of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International.
It is an international, multidisciplinary journal that disseminates information for the many kinds of specialists and practitioners concerned with osteoarthritis.