Philip Perez, Tsung-Heng Tsai, John Hawks, Heather Malyuk Barbone, Joey Pinkl, Partha Thirumala, Jianxin Bao
{"title":"耳科和颅底手术中高速钻孔后未手术耳的听力损失。","authors":"Philip Perez, Tsung-Heng Tsai, John Hawks, Heather Malyuk Barbone, Joey Pinkl, Partha Thirumala, Jianxin Bao","doi":"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if permanent hearing loss occurred in the unoperated ear of patients undergoing otologic and skull base surgery with high-speed otologic drilling.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrospectively studied 250 patients (mean age 57.8 yr; 120 males, and 130 females) undergoing otologic or skull base surgery with high-speed drilling between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We evaluated preoperative and postoperative audiograms for patients undergoing surgery for cochlear implantation (95 patients, 38.0%), cholesteatoma or chronic ear disease (88 patients, 35.2%), repair of lateral skull base encephalocele (26 patients, 10.4%), resection of vestibular schwannoma or meningioma of the cerebellopontine angle (23 patients, 9.2%), lateral temporal bone resection (8 patients, 3.2%), microvascular decompression (7 patients, 2.8%), or other operations involving a high-speed otologic drill (3 patients, 1.2%).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hearing threshold shift, measured as the difference between postoperative threshold and preoperative threshold for each frequency. The association of age, gender, tested frequency, and surgery type with hearing threshold shift was investigated with analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients (40.8%) had a 10-dB or greater worsening of their hearing in at least one frequency on their postoperative audiogram in the contralateral, unoperated ear. One hundred six subjects (42.4%) had no change in hearing of 10 dB or greater at any frequency. Among patients with longitudinal postoperative audiograms, accelerated age-related hearing loss was observed in low frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant number of patients demonstrated poorer hearing thresholds in the contralateral, unoperated ear after otologic and skull base surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19732,"journal":{"name":"Otology & Neurotology","volume":" ","pages":"993-997"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hearing Loss in the Unoperated Ear After High-Speed Drilling in Otologic and Skull Base Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Philip Perez, Tsung-Heng Tsai, John Hawks, Heather Malyuk Barbone, Joey Pinkl, Partha Thirumala, Jianxin Bao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/MAO.0000000000004316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate if permanent hearing loss occurred in the unoperated ear of patients undergoing otologic and skull base surgery with high-speed otologic drilling.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We retrospectively studied 250 patients (mean age 57.8 yr; 120 males, and 130 females) undergoing otologic or skull base surgery with high-speed drilling between 2013 and 2019.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We evaluated preoperative and postoperative audiograms for patients undergoing surgery for cochlear implantation (95 patients, 38.0%), cholesteatoma or chronic ear disease (88 patients, 35.2%), repair of lateral skull base encephalocele (26 patients, 10.4%), resection of vestibular schwannoma or meningioma of the cerebellopontine angle (23 patients, 9.2%), lateral temporal bone resection (8 patients, 3.2%), microvascular decompression (7 patients, 2.8%), or other operations involving a high-speed otologic drill (3 patients, 1.2%).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Hearing threshold shift, measured as the difference between postoperative threshold and preoperative threshold for each frequency. The association of age, gender, tested frequency, and surgery type with hearing threshold shift was investigated with analysis of covariance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients (40.8%) had a 10-dB or greater worsening of their hearing in at least one frequency on their postoperative audiogram in the contralateral, unoperated ear. One hundred six subjects (42.4%) had no change in hearing of 10 dB or greater at any frequency. Among patients with longitudinal postoperative audiograms, accelerated age-related hearing loss was observed in low frequencies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A significant number of patients demonstrated poorer hearing thresholds in the contralateral, unoperated ear after otologic and skull base surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"993-997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Otology & Neurotology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004316\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Otology & Neurotology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000004316","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Hearing Loss in the Unoperated Ear After High-Speed Drilling in Otologic and Skull Base Surgery.
Objective: To evaluate if permanent hearing loss occurred in the unoperated ear of patients undergoing otologic and skull base surgery with high-speed otologic drilling.
Study design: We retrospectively studied 250 patients (mean age 57.8 yr; 120 males, and 130 females) undergoing otologic or skull base surgery with high-speed drilling between 2013 and 2019.
Setting: The University of Pittsburgh Medical Center.
Patients: We evaluated preoperative and postoperative audiograms for patients undergoing surgery for cochlear implantation (95 patients, 38.0%), cholesteatoma or chronic ear disease (88 patients, 35.2%), repair of lateral skull base encephalocele (26 patients, 10.4%), resection of vestibular schwannoma or meningioma of the cerebellopontine angle (23 patients, 9.2%), lateral temporal bone resection (8 patients, 3.2%), microvascular decompression (7 patients, 2.8%), or other operations involving a high-speed otologic drill (3 patients, 1.2%).
Main outcome measures: Hearing threshold shift, measured as the difference between postoperative threshold and preoperative threshold for each frequency. The association of age, gender, tested frequency, and surgery type with hearing threshold shift was investigated with analysis of covariance.
Results: A total of 102 patients (40.8%) had a 10-dB or greater worsening of their hearing in at least one frequency on their postoperative audiogram in the contralateral, unoperated ear. One hundred six subjects (42.4%) had no change in hearing of 10 dB or greater at any frequency. Among patients with longitudinal postoperative audiograms, accelerated age-related hearing loss was observed in low frequencies.
Conclusions: A significant number of patients demonstrated poorer hearing thresholds in the contralateral, unoperated ear after otologic and skull base surgery.
期刊介绍:
Otology & Neurotology publishes original articles relating to both clinical and basic science aspects of otology, neurotology, and cranial base surgery. As the foremost journal in its field, it has become the favored place for publishing the best of new science relating to the human ear and its diseases. The broadly international character of its contributing authors, editorial board, and readership provides the Journal its decidedly global perspective.