新型防肠梗阻三角钉吻合术:克罗恩病患者术后短期疗效的技术报告。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2592
Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Hyun Gu Lee, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
{"title":"新型防肠梗阻三角钉吻合术:克罗恩病患者术后短期疗效的技术报告。","authors":"Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Hyun Gu Lee, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu","doi":"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) has continuously improved, which has led to a decrease in surgical recurrence rates. Despite these advancements, 25% of patients will undergo repeat intestinal surgery. Recurrence of CD commonly occurs on the mesentery side of the anastomosis site.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the new anti-mesenteric side-to-side delta-shaped stapled anastomosis (DSA) with the conventional stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis (CSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included CD patients who underwent ileo-ileal or ileo-colic anastomosis between January 2020 and December 2023. The DSA technique employed a stapler to maintain the concept of anti-mesentery side-to-side anastomosis by performing a 90° vertical closure of the open window compared with the CSA technique. At the corner where the open window is closed, the DSA avoids forming a pouch and creates an anastomosis resembling a delta shape within the intestinal lumen. We compared demographics, preoperative condition, operative findings, and operative outcomes for the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 175 patients, including 92 in the DSA group and 83 in the CSA group. The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and operative findings except for the Montreal classification location. The 30-days postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the DSA group compared with the CSA group (16.3% <i>vs</i> 32.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Ileus incidence was significantly lower in the DSA group than in the CSA group (4.3% <i>vs</i> 14.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.033), and the hospital stay was shorter in the DSA group than in the CSA group (5.67 ± 1.53 days <i>vs</i> 7.39 ± 3.68 days, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DSA technique was feasible and showed comparable postoperative outcomes with lower short-term complications compared with the CSA technique. Further studies on CD recurrence and long-term complications are warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":23759,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New anti-mesenteric delta-shaped stapled anastomosis: Technical report with short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Hyun Gu Lee, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) has continuously improved, which has led to a decrease in surgical recurrence rates. Despite these advancements, 25% of patients will undergo repeat intestinal surgery. Recurrence of CD commonly occurs on the mesentery side of the anastomosis site.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To compare the new anti-mesenteric side-to-side delta-shaped stapled anastomosis (DSA) with the conventional stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis (CSA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included CD patients who underwent ileo-ileal or ileo-colic anastomosis between January 2020 and December 2023. The DSA technique employed a stapler to maintain the concept of anti-mesentery side-to-side anastomosis by performing a 90° vertical closure of the open window compared with the CSA technique. At the corner where the open window is closed, the DSA avoids forming a pouch and creates an anastomosis resembling a delta shape within the intestinal lumen. We compared demographics, preoperative condition, operative findings, and operative outcomes for the two techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study included 175 patients, including 92 in the DSA group and 83 in the CSA group. The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and operative findings except for the Montreal classification location. The 30-days postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the DSA group compared with the CSA group (16.3% <i>vs</i> 32.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.009). Ileus incidence was significantly lower in the DSA group than in the CSA group (4.3% <i>vs</i> 14.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.033), and the hospital stay was shorter in the DSA group than in the CSA group (5.67 ± 1.53 days <i>vs</i> 7.39 ± 3.68 days, <i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The DSA technique was feasible and showed comparable postoperative outcomes with lower short-term complications compared with the CSA technique. Further studies on CD recurrence and long-term complications are warranted.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11362929/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v16.i8.2592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:克罗恩病(CD)的药物治疗不断改进,从而降低了手术复发率。尽管取得了这些进步,但仍有 25% 的患者需要再次接受肠道手术。目的:比较新的抗肠系膜侧对侧三角钉吻合术(DSA)与传统的功能性端对端钉吻合术(CSA):这项回顾性研究纳入了2020年1月至2023年12月期间接受回肠或回肠结肠吻合术的CD患者。与 CSA 技术相比,DSA 技术使用订书机对开窗进行 90° 垂直缝合,从而保持了反肠管侧对侧吻合的概念。在关闭开窗的一角,DSA 避免了形成肠袋,并在肠腔内形成类似三角洲形状的吻合口。我们比较了两种技术的人口统计学、术前情况、手术结果和手术效果:研究共包括 175 名患者,其中 DSA 组 92 人,CSA 组 83 人。除蒙特利尔分类位置外,两组患者的基线特征、术前药物治疗和手术结果相似。DSA 组的术后 30 天并发症发生率明显低于 CSA 组(16.3% vs 32.5%,P = 0.009)。DSA组的回肠梗阻发生率明显低于CSA组(4.3% vs 14.5%,P = 0.033),DSA组的住院时间短于CSA组(5.67 ± 1.53天 vs 7.39 ± 3.68天,P = 0.001):结论:DSA技术是可行的,术后效果与CSA技术相当,短期并发症较低。有必要对 CD 复发和长期并发症进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New anti-mesenteric delta-shaped stapled anastomosis: Technical report with short-term postoperative outcomes in patients with Crohn's disease.

Background: Medical treatment for Crohn's disease (CD) has continuously improved, which has led to a decrease in surgical recurrence rates. Despite these advancements, 25% of patients will undergo repeat intestinal surgery. Recurrence of CD commonly occurs on the mesentery side of the anastomosis site.

Aim: To compare the new anti-mesenteric side-to-side delta-shaped stapled anastomosis (DSA) with the conventional stapled functional end-to-end anastomosis (CSA).

Methods: This retrospective study included CD patients who underwent ileo-ileal or ileo-colic anastomosis between January 2020 and December 2023. The DSA technique employed a stapler to maintain the concept of anti-mesentery side-to-side anastomosis by performing a 90° vertical closure of the open window compared with the CSA technique. At the corner where the open window is closed, the DSA avoids forming a pouch and creates an anastomosis resembling a delta shape within the intestinal lumen. We compared demographics, preoperative condition, operative findings, and operative outcomes for the two techniques.

Results: The study included 175 patients, including 92 in the DSA group and 83 in the CSA group. The two groups were similar in baseline characteristics, preoperative medical treatment, and operative findings except for the Montreal classification location. The 30-days postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in the DSA group compared with the CSA group (16.3% vs 32.5%, P = 0.009). Ileus incidence was significantly lower in the DSA group than in the CSA group (4.3% vs 14.5%, P = 0.033), and the hospital stay was shorter in the DSA group than in the CSA group (5.67 ± 1.53 days vs 7.39 ± 3.68 days, P = 0.001).

Conclusion: The DSA technique was feasible and showed comparable postoperative outcomes with lower short-term complications compared with the CSA technique. Further studies on CD recurrence and long-term complications are warranted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
5.00%
发文量
111
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and safety of B-ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation in the treatment of primary liver cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopic clipping of gastrojejunostomy leakage following Whipple procedure: A case report. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage after failed endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: The road is open for almighty biliopancreatic endoscopists! Enhancing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt procedure efficiency with digital subtraction angiography image overlay technology in esophagogastric variceal bleeding. Establishment and evaluation of prediction model of recurrence after laparoscopic choledocholithotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1