腹股沟疝修补手术中预防性抗生素使用不当的风险因素。

Q3 Medicine Medical Journal of Malaysia Pub Date : 2024-08-01
F Hendrawan, D A A Nugrahningsih, E Purnomo, N A Azdy
{"title":"腹股沟疝修补手术中预防性抗生素使用不当的风险因素。","authors":"F Hendrawan, D A A Nugrahningsih, E Purnomo, N A Azdy","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are some complications that can arise after surgery, like surgical site infection (SSI). In hernia repair, SSI incidence is low. Hence, the clinical practice guideline (CPG) published by the HerniaSurge Group (THG) does not recommend prophylactic antibiotics for hernia repair. Despite the unnecessary use of prophylactic antibiotics, regarding patient safety, prophylactic antibiotics can be used. However, each hospital has its own CPG and recommended antimicrobials based on the infection cases in its site. Regarding antimicrobial resistances, evaluating prophylactic antibiotics is essential to prevent increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of prophylactic antibiotics in hernia inguinal cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analytic study used patients' medical records between 2015 to 2020. Demographic data, surgery data and the used antimicrobial data were extracted and written in case report form. Identification of risk factors for inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics was done using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 55 inappropriate times of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic therapy cases out of 80 cases and 63 cases in post-operative antibiotics were different from the guideline. Statistical analysis did not find any factor related to inappropriate therapy time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The misuse of prophylactic antibiotics was frequently found regarding the duration of prophylactic antibiotics in both pre- and post-surgery setting. Nonetheless, no risk factor was identified with the inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics.</p>","PeriodicalId":39388,"journal":{"name":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk factor for inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics in inguinal hernia repair surgery.\",\"authors\":\"F Hendrawan, D A A Nugrahningsih, E Purnomo, N A Azdy\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are some complications that can arise after surgery, like surgical site infection (SSI). In hernia repair, SSI incidence is low. Hence, the clinical practice guideline (CPG) published by the HerniaSurge Group (THG) does not recommend prophylactic antibiotics for hernia repair. Despite the unnecessary use of prophylactic antibiotics, regarding patient safety, prophylactic antibiotics can be used. However, each hospital has its own CPG and recommended antimicrobials based on the infection cases in its site. Regarding antimicrobial resistances, evaluating prophylactic antibiotics is essential to prevent increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of prophylactic antibiotics in hernia inguinal cases.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This cross-sectional analytic study used patients' medical records between 2015 to 2020. Demographic data, surgery data and the used antimicrobial data were extracted and written in case report form. Identification of risk factors for inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics was done using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 55 inappropriate times of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic therapy cases out of 80 cases and 63 cases in post-operative antibiotics were different from the guideline. Statistical analysis did not find any factor related to inappropriate therapy time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The misuse of prophylactic antibiotics was frequently found regarding the duration of prophylactic antibiotics in both pre- and post-surgery setting. Nonetheless, no risk factor was identified with the inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39388,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Journal of Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Journal of Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:手术后可能会出现一些并发症,如手术部位感染(SSI):手术后可能会出现一些并发症,如手术部位感染(SSI)。在疝修补术中,SSI 的发生率很低。因此,疝气小组(THG)发布的临床实践指南(CPG)不建议在疝气修补术中预防性使用抗生素。尽管预防性抗生素的使用是不必要的,但考虑到患者的安全,预防性抗生素还是可以使用的。不过,每家医院都有自己的 CPG,并根据本医院的感染病例推荐抗菌药物。关于抗菌药耐药性,评估预防性抗生素对防止抗菌药耐药性病例的增加至关重要。本研究旨在评估疝气腹股沟病例中预防性抗生素的使用情况:这项横断面分析研究使用了患者在 2015 年至 2020 年期间的病历。提取人口统计学数据、手术数据和使用抗菌药物的数据,并以病例报告的形式撰写。采用逻辑回归法确定预防性抗生素使用不当的风险因素:结果:在 80 个病例中,我们发现 55 例术前预防性抗生素治疗时间不当,63 例术后抗生素使用与指南不同。统计分析未发现任何与治疗时间不当有关的因素:结论:在手术前和手术后的预防性抗生素使用时间方面,经常出现滥用抗生素的情况。然而,并没有发现与预防性抗生素使用不当有关的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk factor for inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics in inguinal hernia repair surgery.

Introduction: There are some complications that can arise after surgery, like surgical site infection (SSI). In hernia repair, SSI incidence is low. Hence, the clinical practice guideline (CPG) published by the HerniaSurge Group (THG) does not recommend prophylactic antibiotics for hernia repair. Despite the unnecessary use of prophylactic antibiotics, regarding patient safety, prophylactic antibiotics can be used. However, each hospital has its own CPG and recommended antimicrobials based on the infection cases in its site. Regarding antimicrobial resistances, evaluating prophylactic antibiotics is essential to prevent increasing incidence of antimicrobial resistance cases. The aim of this study is to evaluate the use of prophylactic antibiotics in hernia inguinal cases.

Materials and methods: This cross-sectional analytic study used patients' medical records between 2015 to 2020. Demographic data, surgery data and the used antimicrobial data were extracted and written in case report form. Identification of risk factors for inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics was done using logistic regression.

Results: We identified 55 inappropriate times of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic therapy cases out of 80 cases and 63 cases in post-operative antibiotics were different from the guideline. Statistical analysis did not find any factor related to inappropriate therapy time.

Conclusion: The misuse of prophylactic antibiotics was frequently found regarding the duration of prophylactic antibiotics in both pre- and post-surgery setting. Nonetheless, no risk factor was identified with the inappropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Journal of Malaysia
Medical Journal of Malaysia Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
165
期刊介绍: Published since 1890 this journal originated as the Journal of the Straits Medical Association. With the formation of the Malaysian Medical Association (MMA), the Journal became the official organ, supervised by an editorial board. Some of the early Hon. Editors were Mr. H.M. McGladdery (1960 - 1964), Dr. A.A. Sandosham (1965 - 1977), Prof. Paul C.Y. Chen (1977 - 1987). It is a scientific journal, published quarterly and can be found in medical libraries in many parts of the world. The Journal also enjoys the status of being listed in the Index Medicus, the internationally accepted reference index of medical journals. The editorial columns often reflect the Association''s views and attitudes towards medical problems in the country. The MJM aims to be a peer reviewed scientific journal of the highest quality. We want to ensure that whatever data is published is true and any opinion expressed important to medical science. We believe being Malaysian is our unique niche; our priority will be for scientific knowledge about diseases found in Malaysia and for the practice of medicine in Malaysia. The MJM will archive knowledge about the changing pattern of human diseases and our endeavours to overcome them. It will also document how medicine develops as a profession in the nation. We will communicate and co-operate with other scientific journals in Malaysia. We seek articles that are of educational value to doctors. We will consider all unsolicited articles submitted to the journal and will commission distinguished Malaysians to write relevant review articles. We want to help doctors make better decisions and be good at judging the value of scientific data. We want to help doctors write better, to be articulate and precise.
期刊最新文献
Adverse event following immunisation of adsorbed-inactivated Coronavac (Sinovac) and ChAdOx1 nCOV-19 (Astra Zeneca) of COVID-19 vaccines. Comparison of outcomes in epithelial ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer and primary peritoneal serous carcinoma between a multidisciplinary and a single-speciality centre. Contact sensitisation pattern of patients with eczema at the face and neck region: A retrospective study in Kuala Lumpur. Eating disorders among physically disabled national athletes in Malaysia. Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in postoperative nausea and vomiting in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1