体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中新鲜胚胎移植与冷冻胚胎移植的比较:新生儿结局的系统回顾和元分析》。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicina-Lithuania Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.3390/medicina60081373
Raluca Tocariu, Lucia Elena Niculae, Alexandru Ștefan Niculae, Andreea Carp-Velișcu, Elvira Brătilă
{"title":"体外受精/卵胞浆内单精子注射周期中新鲜胚胎移植与冷冻胚胎移植的比较:新生儿结局的系统回顾和元分析》。","authors":"Raluca Tocariu, Lucia Elena Niculae, Alexandru Ștefan Niculae, Andreea Carp-Velișcu, Elvira Brătilă","doi":"10.3390/medicina60081373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. <i>Results</i>: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. <i>Conclusions</i>: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.</p>","PeriodicalId":49830,"journal":{"name":"Medicina-Lithuania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Raluca Tocariu, Lucia Elena Niculae, Alexandru Ștefan Niculae, Andreea Carp-Velișcu, Elvira Brătilă\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/medicina60081373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background and Objectives</i>: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. <i>Materials and Methods</i>: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. <i>Results</i>: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, <i>p</i> < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, <i>p</i> < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, <i>p</i> < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. <i>Conclusions</i>: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49830,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11356234/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicina-Lithuania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081373\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina-Lithuania","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60081373","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管已有大量研究致力于探讨新鲜胚胎移植和冷冻胚胎移植在产科结果和妊娠成功率方面的区别,但专门研究新生儿结果的全面分析仍然很少。我们的研究旨在深入分析试管婴儿/卵胞浆内单精子显微注射(IVF/ICSI)周期中移植新鲜胚胎和冷冻胚胎(ET 与 FET)后的新生儿结局。材料与方法:检索了 1980 年 1 月至 2024 年 2 月期间的多个数据库(PubMed/MEDLINE、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Wiley、Scopus、Ovid 和 Science Direct)。两名审稿人根据纳入和排除标准对文章进行了识别和数据提取。方法学质量采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)或修订版 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具进行评估。荟萃分析使用 RevMan 5.4 进行。结果对 20 项研究进行了定性和定量分析,共有 171 481 人参与。在整个试管婴儿/ICSI人群中,新鲜胚胎移植比冷冻胚胎移植的早产率明显增加(OR 1.26,95% CI 1.18-1.35,p < 0.00001),而且这组人群中出现低出生体重儿(OR 1.37,95% CI 1.27-1.48,p < 0.00001)和小胎龄儿(OR 1.81,95% CI 1.63-2.00,p < 0.00001)的几率更大。与此相反,冷冻胚胎移植可导致巨大儿(OR 0.59,95% CI 0.54-0.65,p < 0.00001)或大胎龄儿(OR 0.64,95% CI 0.60-0.69,p < 0.00001)。在先天性畸形或新生儿死亡率方面没有观察到明显差异。结论该系统性综述证实,通过冷冻胚胎移植受孕的单胎婴儿与通过新鲜胚胎移植受孕的单胎婴儿相比,早产、低出生体重和胎龄偏小的风险较低。数据支持胚胎冷冻保存,但建议选择性冷冻应仅限于有明确适应症或在临床研究框架内的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Fresh versus Frozen Embryo Transfer in In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Neonatal Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Although considerable research has been devoted to examining the distinctions between fresh and frozen embryo transfer regarding obstetric outcomes and rates of pregnancy success, there is still a scarcity of thorough analyses that specifically examine neonatal outcomes. The objective of our study was to provide an in-depth analysis of neonatal outcomes that occur after the transfer of fresh and frozen embryos (ET vs. FET) in IVF/ICSI cycles. Materials and Methods: Multiple databases (PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Wiley, Scopus, Ovid and Science Direct) were searched from January 1980 to February 2024. Two reviewers conducted the article identification and data extraction, meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. The methodological quality was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Results: Twenty studies, including 171,481 participants in total, were subjected to qualitative and quantitative analyses. A significant increase in preterm birth rates was noted with fresh embryo transfer compared to FET in the overall IVF/ICSI population (OR 1.26, 95% CI 1.18-1.35, p < 0.00001), as well as greater odds of a low birth weight (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.48, p < 0.00001) and small-for-gestational-age infants in this group (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.63-2.00, p < 0.00001). In contrast, frozen embryo transfer can result in macrosomic (OR 0.59, 95% CI 0.54-0.65, p < 0.00001) or large-for-gestational-age infants (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.60-0.69, p < 0.00001). No significant difference was observed regarding congenital malformations or neonatal death rates. Conclusions: This systematic review confirmed that singleton babies conceived by frozen embryo transfer are at lower risk of preterm delivery, low birthweight and being small for gestational age than their counterparts conceived by fresh embryo transfer. The data support embryo cryopreservation but suggest that elective freezing should be limited to cases with a proven indication or within the framework of a clinical study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicina-Lithuania
Medicina-Lithuania 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1578
审稿时长
25.04 days
期刊介绍: The journal’s main focus is on reviews as well as clinical and experimental investigations. The journal aims to advance knowledge related to problems in medicine in developing countries as well as developed economies, to disseminate research on global health, and to promote and foster prevention and treatment of diseases worldwide. MEDICINA publications cater to clinicians, diagnosticians and researchers, and serve as a forum to discuss the current status of health-related matters and their impact on a global and local scale.
期刊最新文献
A Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study on Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Feasibility and Clinical Correlation. Anterior Sacroiliac Fracture Dislocation: A Comparative Radiologic analysis of Crescent Fractures in Pelvic Ring Injuries: A Retrospective Study. Determinants of Depression in Caregivers of Geriatric Patients in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Does Adjuvant Chemotherapy Benefit Patients with T4 N0 Colon Cancer? Endovascular Interventions of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism with Symptomatic Iliocaval Venous Thrombosis: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1