微创二尖瓣手术中复杂解剖和患者风险特征的影响

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Annals of Thoracic Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050
Paolo Berretta, Antonios Pitsis, Nikolaos Bonaros, Jorg Kempfert, Manuel Wilbring, Pierluigi Stefano, Frank Van Praet, Joseph Lamelas, Pietro G Malvindi, Marc Gerdisch, Davide Pacini, Tristan Yan, Mauro Rinaldi, Loris Salvador, Antonio Fiore, Torsten Doenst, Nguyen Hoang Dinh, Tom C Nguyen, Marco Di Eusanio
{"title":"微创二尖瓣手术中复杂解剖和患者风险特征的影响","authors":"Paolo Berretta, Antonios Pitsis, Nikolaos Bonaros, Jorg Kempfert, Manuel Wilbring, Pierluigi Stefano, Frank Van Praet, Joseph Lamelas, Pietro G Malvindi, Marc Gerdisch, Davide Pacini, Tristan Yan, Mauro Rinaldi, Loris Salvador, Antonio Fiore, Torsten Doenst, Nguyen Hoang Dinh, Tom C Nguyen, Marco Di Eusanio","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were assigned to categories of complex degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (DMR; bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low-risk (EuroSCORE II <8%) and high-risk (EuroSCORE II >8%) cohorts. A logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR, 1296; simple DMR, 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex DMR and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female sex, age, and reoperation, whereas Barlow disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex DMR and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed by minimally invasive techniques. However, whereas complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"137-144"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Complex Anatomy and Patient Risk Profile in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Paolo Berretta, Antonios Pitsis, Nikolaos Bonaros, Jorg Kempfert, Manuel Wilbring, Pierluigi Stefano, Frank Van Praet, Joseph Lamelas, Pietro G Malvindi, Marc Gerdisch, Davide Pacini, Tristan Yan, Mauro Rinaldi, Loris Salvador, Antonio Fiore, Torsten Doenst, Nguyen Hoang Dinh, Tom C Nguyen, Marco Di Eusanio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We aimed to assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients were assigned to categories of complex degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (DMR; bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low-risk (EuroSCORE II <8%) and high-risk (EuroSCORE II >8%) cohorts. A logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR, 1296; simple DMR, 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex DMR and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female sex, age, and reoperation, whereas Barlow disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex DMR and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed by minimally invasive techniques. However, whereas complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"137-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Thoracic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/8/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2024.07.050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:评估二尖瓣复杂性疾病和患者风险状况对手术结果的影响:在迷你二尖瓣国际注册(MMIR)的大型队列中,评估复杂二尖瓣疾病和患者风险状况对手术结果的影响:将患者分为复杂退行性二尖瓣反流(DMR)(双叶或二尖瓣前叶脱垂/瓣膜缺损)和单纯二尖瓣反流(二尖瓣后叶脱垂/瓣膜缺损)两类。对低风险(EuroSCORE II8%)队列进行了分组分析。应用逻辑回归模型研究了瓣膜解剖结构和患者风险因素对瓣膜修复率和手术风险的影响:研究队列包括4524名DMR患者(复杂DMR 1296人,简单DMR 3228人)。复杂DMR和简单DMR的瓣膜修复率分别为87.3%和91%。瓣膜置换的预测因素包括前叶脱垂/瓣膜脱垂、双叶瓣膜脱垂、女性性别、年龄和再次手术,而巴洛氏病具有保护作用。复杂瓣膜置换术和简单瓣膜置换术的临床效果相当。在亚组分析中,高风险患者在瓣膜修复和手术死亡率方面的结果都不尽如人意:我们的研究结果表明,使用微创技术可以令人满意地治疗复杂 DMR。然而,虽然复杂疾病的手术风险较低,但前叶病变和双叶瓣外翻仍是瓣膜修复成功的负面预测因素。相反,无论DMR的复杂程度如何,高风险患者的瓣膜修复率都不尽如人意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Impact of Complex Anatomy and Patient Risk Profile in Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery.

Background: We aimed to assess the impact of complex mitral valve disease and patient risk profile on operative outcomes in the large cohort of the Mini-Mitral International Registry.

Methods: Patients were assigned to categories of complex degenerative mitral valve regurgitation (DMR; bileaflet or anterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail) and simple DMR (posterior mitral leaflet prolapse/flail). Subgroup analyses was performed in low-risk (EuroSCORE II <8%) and high-risk (EuroSCORE II >8%) cohorts. A logistic regression model was applied to investigate the impact of valve anatomy and patient risk factors on valve repair rate and operative risk.

Results: The study cohort consisted of 4524 patients with DMR (complex DMR, 1296; simple DMR, 3228). Valve repair rate was 87.3% and 91% in complex DMR and simple DMR, respectively. Predictors of valve replacement were anterior leaflet prolapse/flail, bileaflet flail, female sex, age, and reoperation, whereas Barlow disease was protective. Clinical results were comparable between complex DMR and simple DMR. On subgroup analyses, high-risk patients showed less satisfactory outcomes with respect to both the valve repair and operative mortality rates.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that complex DMR can be satisfactorily addressed by minimally invasive techniques. However, whereas complex disease was associated with low operative risk, anterior leaflet lesions and bileaflet flail remain negative predictors of successful valve repair. Conversely, valve repair rate was less satisfactory in high-risk patients, regardless of DMR complexity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
期刊最新文献
Rerepair for Mitral Insufficiency. Concomitant Surgical Ablation in Paroxysmal vs Persistent Atrial Fibrillation During Mitral Surgery. Long-term Outcome After Repair of Transposition of the Great Arteries With Aortic Arch Obstruction. Impact of Margin Distance on Locoregional Recurrence and Survival After Thoracoscopic Segmentectomy. Outcomes in Children Who Undergo Postcardiotomy Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Report From the STS-CHSD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1