前臂、手腕和手部的虚拟动态关节角度测量:数字动态关节角度计的双盲心理测量研究。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001
Busra Guvenc, Cigdem Ayhan Kuru, Seda Namaldi, Ilhami Kuru
{"title":"前臂、手腕和手部的虚拟动态关节角度测量:数字动态关节角度计的双盲心理测量研究。","authors":"Busra Guvenc, Cigdem Ayhan Kuru, Seda Namaldi, Ilhami Kuru","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various virtual goniometers have been used for photographic measurements. However, there is no single method that is both reliable and valid for measuring the forearm, wrist, and finger joints.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the criterion validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of a virtual goniometer for assessing forearm, wrist, and finger joints using screenshots from video recordings and to calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a clinical measurement study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Goniometric measurements were performed independently by two observers in 26 healthy participants (49 hands) using a virtual goniometer. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the agreement between virtual and manual goniometer measurements. Reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess agreement between virtual and manual goniometers and interobserver agreement for virtual measurements. The difference between measurements was analyzed using the Student test and Bland-Altman plots. SEM and MDC were both used to determine the error associated with the measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong agreement between measurements (ICC = 0.69-0.98) and positive moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.96; p < 0.001) were observed. Bland-Altman plots showed the agreement between the two measurement methods. Intra-rater (ICC = 0.80-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.99) were high. SEM was low (2°-4°) and MDC ranged from 4°-12°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The virtual goniometer proved to be a valid and reliable method for measuring joint angles from screenshots. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the virtual goniometer was high. The average bias between the virtual and manual goniometer was small. Measurement errors were low for forearm, wrist, and hand movements, with the largest measurement errors observed for the second and third fingers.</p>","PeriodicalId":54814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.\",\"authors\":\"Busra Guvenc, Cigdem Ayhan Kuru, Seda Namaldi, Ilhami Kuru\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Various virtual goniometers have been used for photographic measurements. However, there is no single method that is both reliable and valid for measuring the forearm, wrist, and finger joints.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the criterion validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of a virtual goniometer for assessing forearm, wrist, and finger joints using screenshots from video recordings and to calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This is a clinical measurement study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Goniometric measurements were performed independently by two observers in 26 healthy participants (49 hands) using a virtual goniometer. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the agreement between virtual and manual goniometer measurements. Reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess agreement between virtual and manual goniometers and interobserver agreement for virtual measurements. The difference between measurements was analyzed using the Student test and Bland-Altman plots. SEM and MDC were both used to determine the error associated with the measurements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Strong agreement between measurements (ICC = 0.69-0.98) and positive moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.96; p < 0.001) were observed. Bland-Altman plots showed the agreement between the two measurement methods. Intra-rater (ICC = 0.80-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.99) were high. SEM was low (2°-4°) and MDC ranged from 4°-12°.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The virtual goniometer proved to be a valid and reliable method for measuring joint angles from screenshots. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the virtual goniometer was high. The average bias between the virtual and manual goniometer was small. Measurement errors were low for forearm, wrist, and hand movements, with the largest measurement errors observed for the second and third fingers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Hand Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jht.2024.05.001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:各种虚拟关节角度计已被用于摄影测量。目的:本研究旨在调查使用视频记录截图评估前臂、手腕和手指关节的虚拟测角器的标准效度、评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性,并计算测量标准误差(SEM)和最小可检测变化(MDC):研究设计:这是一项临床测量研究:研究设计:这是一项临床测量研究。方法:由两名观察者使用虚拟动态关节角度计对 26 名健康参与者(49 只手)进行独立的动态关节角度测量。通过检查虚拟测角器和手动测角器测量之间的一致性来评估标准有效性。使用类内相关系数(ICC)计算可靠性,以评估虚拟和手动动态关节角度计之间的一致性,以及虚拟测量的观察者之间的一致性。测量结果之间的差异采用学生测试和布兰德-阿尔特曼图进行分析。SEM和MDC均用于确定与测量相关的误差:结果:测量结果之间具有很强的一致性(ICC = 0.69-0.98)和中高度正相关性(r = 0.52-0.96;p 结论:虚拟动态关节角度计的测量结果与实际测量结果之间具有很强的一致性(ICC = 0.69-0.98)和中高度正相关性:事实证明,虚拟关节角度计是一种通过截图测量关节角度的有效而可靠的方法。虚拟关节角度计的评分者之间和评分者内部的可靠性都很高。虚拟关节角度计和手动关节角度计之间的平均偏差很小。前臂、手腕和手部运动的测量误差较小,第二和第三指的测量误差最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Virtual goniometric measurement of the forearm, wrist, and hand: A double-blind psychometric study of a digital goniometer.

Background: Various virtual goniometers have been used for photographic measurements. However, there is no single method that is both reliable and valid for measuring the forearm, wrist, and finger joints.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the criterion validity and intra- and inter-rater reliability of a virtual goniometer for assessing forearm, wrist, and finger joints using screenshots from video recordings and to calculate the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimum detectable change (MDC).

Study design: This is a clinical measurement study.

Methods: Goniometric measurements were performed independently by two observers in 26 healthy participants (49 hands) using a virtual goniometer. Criterion validity was assessed by examining the agreement between virtual and manual goniometer measurements. Reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) to assess agreement between virtual and manual goniometers and interobserver agreement for virtual measurements. The difference between measurements was analyzed using the Student test and Bland-Altman plots. SEM and MDC were both used to determine the error associated with the measurements.

Results: Strong agreement between measurements (ICC = 0.69-0.98) and positive moderate to high correlation (r = 0.52-0.96; p < 0.001) were observed. Bland-Altman plots showed the agreement between the two measurement methods. Intra-rater (ICC = 0.80-0.99) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.76-0.99) were high. SEM was low (2°-4°) and MDC ranged from 4°-12°.

Conclusions: The virtual goniometer proved to be a valid and reliable method for measuring joint angles from screenshots. The inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of the virtual goniometer was high. The average bias between the virtual and manual goniometer was small. Measurement errors were low for forearm, wrist, and hand movements, with the largest measurement errors observed for the second and third fingers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hand Therapy
Journal of Hand Therapy 医学-外科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
19.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Hand Therapy is designed for hand therapists, occupational and physical therapists, and other hand specialists involved in the rehabilitation of disabling hand problems. The Journal functions as a source of education and information by publishing scientific and clinical articles. Regular features include original reports, clinical reviews, case studies, editorials, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
The outcome difference between acute bony and tendinous mallet fingers treated conservatively in children. Force control of pinch grip: Normative data of a holistic evaluation. Digital wound assessment by hand specialists is moderately reliable. Dorsal blocking orthoses for proximal interphalangeal joint volar plate injuries: A retrospective cohort study investigating the impact of joint angle on patient outcomes. Understanding the implications of hand impairments in light of the International Classification of Function model.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1