坦桑尼亚卫生专业人员对产科超声波的经验和看法:横断面研究。

Cecilia Bergström, Matilda Ngarina, Muzdalifat Abeid, Hussein Kidanto, Kristina Edvardsson, Sophia Holmlund, Rhonda Small, Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma, Joseph Ntaganira, Pham Thi Lan, Ingrid Mogren
{"title":"坦桑尼亚卫生专业人员对产科超声波的经验和看法:横断面研究。","authors":"Cecilia Bergström, Matilda Ngarina, Muzdalifat Abeid, Hussein Kidanto, Kristina Edvardsson, Sophia Holmlund, Rhonda Small, Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma, Joseph Ntaganira, Pham Thi Lan, Ingrid Mogren","doi":"10.1177/17455057241273675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore health professionals' perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, <i>n</i> = 307 and midwives/nurses, <i>n</i> = 329).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26-3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10-4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30-4.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":75327,"journal":{"name":"Women's health (London, England)","volume":"20 ","pages":"17455057241273675"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"Cecilia Bergström, Matilda Ngarina, Muzdalifat Abeid, Hussein Kidanto, Kristina Edvardsson, Sophia Holmlund, Rhonda Small, Jean Paul Semasaka Sengoma, Joseph Ntaganira, Pham Thi Lan, Ingrid Mogren\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17455057241273675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To explore health professionals' perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, <i>n</i> = 307 and midwives/nurses, <i>n</i> = 329).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26-3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10-4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30-4.87).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"volume\":\"20 \",\"pages\":\"17455057241273675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363060/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health (London, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241273675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health (London, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17455057241273675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:产科超声波被认为对确定胎龄、识别单胎或多胎妊娠、定位胎盘和胎儿畸形以及监测胎儿生长和妊娠相关并发症以改善患者管理非常重要:目的:探讨坦桑尼亚医疗专业人员对产科超声检查不同方面的看法,包括自我报告的超声检查技能,以及在临床环境中如何提高产科超声检查的可及性和利用率:横断面研究:数据收集于2017年11月至12月进行,采用的调查问卷基于之前CROss国家超声研究(CROCUS研究)的定性研究成果。达累斯萨拉姆地区5个城市和半城市的17个医疗机构被纳入其中,636名医疗专业人员参与其中(医生,n = 307;助产士/护士,n = 329):大多数医疗专业人员(82% 的医生,81% 的助产士/护士)认为产科超声波在妊娠临床管理中具有决定性作用。结果表明各学科之间存在能力差距:51%的医生和 48.8%的助产士/护士表示没有评估宫颈长度的技能或技能水平较低。同样,在评估胎儿心脏四腔切面(医生:51%,助产士/护士:61%)、主动脉、肺动脉(医生:60.5%,助产士/护士:65%)和多普勒评估(脐动脉:医生:60.6%,助产士/护士:56.1%)方面也存在不足。与助产士/护士相比,医生更倾向于同意或非常同意超声波设备越多,利用率越高(几率比(OR)2.13;95% 置信区间(CI)1.26-3.61),超声波质量越好,利用率越高。61)、提高超声波机的质量(OR 2.27;95% CI 1.10-4.69)、对目前从事超声波检查的医疗专业人员进行更多培训(OR 2.11;95% CI 1.08-4.17)以及对更多医生进行超声波检查培训(OR 2.51;95% CI 1.30-4.87):结论:要改善坦桑尼亚产科超声波检查的提供情况,需要更多和更高质量的超声波机、加强对医疗专业人员的培训以及增加接受过超声波使用培训的医生人数。为了进一步提高产科超声波在坦桑尼亚孕产妇护理中的可及性和利用率,必须对助产士进行产科超声波基本技术培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Health professionals' experiences and views on obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania: A cross-sectional study.

Background: Obstetric ultrasound is considered important for determining gestational age, identifying single or multiple pregnancies, locating the placenta and fetal anomalies and monitoring fetal growth and pregnancy-related complications in order to improve patient management.

Objectives: To explore health professionals' perspectives on different aspects of obstetric ultrasound in Tanzania regarding self-reported skills in performing ultrasound examinations and what could improve access to and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in the clinical setting.

Design: Cross-sectional study.

Material and methods: Data was collected between November and December 2017 using a questionnaire based on previous qualitative research results from the CROss Country UltraSound Study (CROCUS Study). Seventeen healthcare facilities in 5 urban and semiurban municipalities in the Dar-es-Salaam region were included, with 636 health professionals participating (physicians, n = 307 and midwives/nurses, n = 329).

Results: Most health professionals (82% physicians, 81% midwives/nurses) believed that obstetric ultrasound was decisive in the clinical management of pregnancy. Results indicate proficiency gaps across disciplines: 51% of physicians and 48.8% of midwives/nurses reported no or low-level skills in assessing cervical length. Similarly, deficiencies were observed in evaluating the four-chamber view of the fetal heart (physicians: 51%, midwives/nurses: 61%), aorta, pulmonary artery (physicians: 60.5%, midwives/nurses: 65%) and Doppler assessments (umbilical artery: physicians 60.6%, midwives/nurses 56.1%). Compared to midwives/nurses, physicians were significantly more likely to agree or strongly agree that utilization would improve with more ultrasound machines (odds ratio (OR) 2.13; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.26-3.61), better quality of ultrasound machines (OR 2.27; 95% CI 1.10-4.69), more training for health professionals currently performing ultrasound (OR 2.11; 95% CI 1.08-4.17) and more physicians trained in ultrasound (OR 2.51; 95% CI 1.30-4.87).

Conclusions: Improving the provision of obstetric ultrasound examinations in Tanzania requires more and better-quality ultrasound machines, enhanced training for health professionals and an increased number of physicians trained in ultrasound use. To further increase the accessibility and utilization of obstetric ultrasound in maternity care in Tanzania, it is essential to provide training for midwives in basic obstetric ultrasound techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical violence and its associations: Insights from nationally representative data in India. Unlocking breast cancer in Brazilian public health system: Using tissue microarray for accurate immunohistochemical evaluation with limitations in subtyping. Adapting and validating the satisfaction, alertness, timing, efficiency, and duration-breast cancer (SATED-BC) scale for measuring sleep health in Spanish women treated for breast cancer. "Listening to understand," exploring postpartum women's perceptions of their social networks and social support in relation to their health behaviors and weight: A qualitative exploratory study. Evaluation of mental disorder related to colposcopy procedure during the COVID period: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1