产科中心血糖仪对比研究

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2024-07-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2024.0030
Rihab Ayadi, Monia Tlig, Imène Ben Jdida, Kaouther Zribi, Linda Khefacha, Mouna Sassi, Balsam Kacem, Amani Chérif
{"title":"产科中心血糖仪对比研究","authors":"Rihab Ayadi, Monia Tlig, Imène Ben Jdida, Kaouther Zribi, Linda Khefacha, Mouna Sassi, Balsam Kacem, Amani Chérif","doi":"10.1089/whr.2024.0030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring of diabetes by measuring capillary blood glucose using a glucometer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the three most used glucose meters in diabetic patients in a maternity and neonatal center in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and stability.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comparative study on 100 diabetic patients admitted to the various departments of a maternity and neonatal center. For each patient, a capillary measurement was made using each of the three glucometers to be tested (Accucheck<sup>®</sup>, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Bionime<sup>®</sup>) as well as a blood glucose on venous blood, performed in the laboratory using the Siemens X brand plus<sup>®</sup> PLC (reference method). The same sample was used to carry out all measurements.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand reader and the On Call<sup>®</sup> brand thus, show a better correlation for open and closed bottles of test strips'storage, compared with the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We found that the Accucheck<sup>®</sup> and On Call<sup>®</sup> readers are comparable in terms of reliability of results and are better than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We have found that, first using closed vials give more accurate results for glycemia readers and also, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand readers are more reliable and accurate than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"5 1","pages":"572-578"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347866/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Study Between Blood Glucose Meters in a Maternity Center.\",\"authors\":\"Rihab Ayadi, Monia Tlig, Imène Ben Jdida, Kaouther Zribi, Linda Khefacha, Mouna Sassi, Balsam Kacem, Amani Chérif\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/whr.2024.0030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Monitoring of diabetes by measuring capillary blood glucose using a glucometer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare the three most used glucose meters in diabetic patients in a maternity and neonatal center in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and stability.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A comparative study on 100 diabetic patients admitted to the various departments of a maternity and neonatal center. For each patient, a capillary measurement was made using each of the three glucometers to be tested (Accucheck<sup>®</sup>, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Bionime<sup>®</sup>) as well as a blood glucose on venous blood, performed in the laboratory using the Siemens X brand plus<sup>®</sup> PLC (reference method). The same sample was used to carry out all measurements.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand reader and the On Call<sup>®</sup> brand thus, show a better correlation for open and closed bottles of test strips'storage, compared with the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We found that the Accucheck<sup>®</sup> and On Call<sup>®</sup> readers are comparable in terms of reliability of results and are better than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader. We have found that, first using closed vials give more accurate results for glycemia readers and also, On Call<sup>®</sup> and Accucheck<sup>®</sup> brand readers are more reliable and accurate than the Bionime<sup>®</sup> brand reader.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":75329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"572-578\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11347866/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0030\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2024.0030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:通过使用血糖仪测量毛细血管血糖来监测糖尿病:通过使用血糖仪测量毛细血管血糖来监测糖尿病:比较产科和新生儿中心糖尿病患者最常用的三种血糖仪的重复性、准确性和稳定性:对一家妇产和新生儿中心各科室收治的 100 名糖尿病患者进行比较研究。对每位患者分别使用三种待测血糖仪(Accucheck®、On Call® 和 Bionime®)进行毛细血管血糖测量,并在实验室使用西门子 X brand plus® PLC(参考方法)进行静脉血血糖测量。所有测量均使用同一样本:因此,与 Bionime® 品牌读数器相比,Accucheck® 品牌读数器和 On Call® 品牌读数器对开瓶和闭瓶储存的试纸显示出更好的相关性。我们发现,就结果的可靠性而言,Accucheck® 和 On Call® 读取器不相上下,且优于 Bionime® 品牌读取器。我们发现,首先使用封闭式血糖仪能得到更准确的结果,On Call® 和 Accucheck® 品牌的血糖仪也比 Bionime® 品牌的血糖仪更可靠、更准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Study Between Blood Glucose Meters in a Maternity Center.

Background: Monitoring of diabetes by measuring capillary blood glucose using a glucometer.

Objectives: To compare the three most used glucose meters in diabetic patients in a maternity and neonatal center in terms of repeatability, accuracy, and stability.

Methodology: A comparative study on 100 diabetic patients admitted to the various departments of a maternity and neonatal center. For each patient, a capillary measurement was made using each of the three glucometers to be tested (Accucheck®, On Call® and Bionime®) as well as a blood glucose on venous blood, performed in the laboratory using the Siemens X brand plus® PLC (reference method). The same sample was used to carry out all measurements.

Results and conclusions: The Accucheck® brand reader and the On Call® brand thus, show a better correlation for open and closed bottles of test strips'storage, compared with the Bionime® brand reader. We found that the Accucheck® and On Call® readers are comparable in terms of reliability of results and are better than the Bionime® brand reader. We have found that, first using closed vials give more accurate results for glycemia readers and also, On Call® and Accucheck® brand readers are more reliable and accurate than the Bionime® brand reader.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Young Adults' Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Increased risks of Maternal Mental Health Conditions Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila, Prevotellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae spp. as Possible Markers in Women-Related Nutritional and Clinical Trials: Familial Mediterranean Fever Disease. Impact of Illness Perception in Overweight and Obesity on Bio-Functional Age and Eating/Movement Behavior-A Follow-Up Study. Web-Based Development of Standard Operating Procedures and Midwifery Trainings at Ugandan Birth Clinic in the Framework of Implementing a Quality Improvement System for the MEWU-Midwife Exchange with Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1