在早孕期使用米非司酮后再使用两剂米索前列醇进行药物流产的成功案例。

Lindsay Burton, Rachel Perry, Janet Jacobson
{"title":"在早孕期使用米非司酮后再使用两剂米索前列醇进行药物流产的成功案例。","authors":"Lindsay Burton, Rachel Perry, Janet Jacobson","doi":"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare medication abortion (MAB) success in very early pregnancy (VEP) with mifepristone followed by either one or two doses of misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of VEP MABs from July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by a single dose of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal 24 to 48 hours later and MABs from June 21, 2022 to October 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal spaced 4 hours apart, with first dose taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone. Serum BhCG was collected at the time of mifepristone treatment with additional BhCG collected 48 to 72 hours after misoprostol treatment in both groups. Success was defined as a BhCG decline of ≥50%. MAB failure was defined as ongoing, viable pregnancy determined by follow-up ultrasound or procedural intervention with aspiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 423 patients in the single-dose misoprostol group and 262 patients in the two-dose misoprostol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. In the single-dose group, 372 (87.9%) were treated successfully; in the two-dose group, 224 (85.5%) were treated successfully. There was no significant difference in MAB success between the groups (p = 0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of a second dose of misoprostol does not improve the success of MAB in VEP.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Additional research is needed to identify interventions to improve the success of MAB in VEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":93955,"journal":{"name":"Contraception","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Success of medication abortion with mifepristone followed by two doses of misoprostol in very early pregnancy.\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay Burton, Rachel Perry, Janet Jacobson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare medication abortion (MAB) success in very early pregnancy (VEP) with mifepristone followed by either one or two doses of misoprostol.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of VEP MABs from July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by a single dose of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal 24 to 48 hours later and MABs from June 21, 2022 to October 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal spaced 4 hours apart, with first dose taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone. Serum BhCG was collected at the time of mifepristone treatment with additional BhCG collected 48 to 72 hours after misoprostol treatment in both groups. Success was defined as a BhCG decline of ≥50%. MAB failure was defined as ongoing, viable pregnancy determined by follow-up ultrasound or procedural intervention with aspiration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 423 patients in the single-dose misoprostol group and 262 patients in the two-dose misoprostol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. In the single-dose group, 372 (87.9%) were treated successfully; in the two-dose group, 224 (85.5%) were treated successfully. There was no significant difference in MAB success between the groups (p = 0.73).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The addition of a second dose of misoprostol does not improve the success of MAB in VEP.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>Additional research is needed to identify interventions to improve the success of MAB in VEP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contraception\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contraception\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraception","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较药物流产(MAB)在极早期妊娠(VEP)中的成功率:比较使用米非司酮后再使用一剂或两剂米索前列醇的药物流产(MAB)在极早期妊娠(VEP)中的成功率:研究设计:我们对 2021 年 1 月 7 日至 2022 年 5 月 31 日期间使用米非司酮 200 毫克口服并在 24-48 小时后使用单剂量米索前列醇 800 毫微克口服液的 VEP 药物流产病例和 2022 年 6 月 21 日至 2022 年 10 月 31 日期间使用米非司酮 200 毫克口服并在 4 小时内间隔使用两剂量米索前列醇 800 毫微克口服液的药物流产病例进行了回顾性队列分析,第一剂在米非司酮使用 24-48 小时后服用。在米非司酮治疗时采集血清 BhCG,在米索前列醇治疗后 48-72 小时再采集血清 BhCG。成功的定义是 BhCG 下降大于或等于 50%。米索前列醇治疗失败的定义是通过随访超声波检查或吸宫术进行程序性干预而确定的持续存活妊娠:单剂量米索前列醇组共有 423 名患者,双剂量米索前列醇组共有 262 名患者。两组患者的基线特征无明显差异。单剂量组中,372 例(87.9%)患者治疗成功;双剂量组中,224 例(85.5%)患者治疗成功。两组的 MAB 成功率无明显差异(P=0.73):临床试验注册号:临床试验注册号:不详。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Success of medication abortion with mifepristone followed by two doses of misoprostol in very early pregnancy.

Objectives: To compare medication abortion (MAB) success in very early pregnancy (VEP) with mifepristone followed by either one or two doses of misoprostol.

Study design: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of VEP MABs from July 1, 2021 to May 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by a single dose of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal 24 to 48 hours later and MABs from June 21, 2022 to October 31, 2022 treated with mifepristone 200 mg oral followed by two doses of misoprostol 800 mcg buccal spaced 4 hours apart, with first dose taken 24 to 48 hours after mifepristone. Serum BhCG was collected at the time of mifepristone treatment with additional BhCG collected 48 to 72 hours after misoprostol treatment in both groups. Success was defined as a BhCG decline of ≥50%. MAB failure was defined as ongoing, viable pregnancy determined by follow-up ultrasound or procedural intervention with aspiration.

Results: There were 423 patients in the single-dose misoprostol group and 262 patients in the two-dose misoprostol group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in baseline characteristics. In the single-dose group, 372 (87.9%) were treated successfully; in the two-dose group, 224 (85.5%) were treated successfully. There was no significant difference in MAB success between the groups (p = 0.73).

Conclusions: The addition of a second dose of misoprostol does not improve the success of MAB in VEP.

Implications: Additional research is needed to identify interventions to improve the success of MAB in VEP.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Economic analysis of foregoing Rh immunoglobulin for bleeding in pregnancy <12 weeks gestation. Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study. Ongoing contraceptive goals of patients who did not achieve desired postpartum permanent contraception prior to hospital discharge. The association of insertion methods on immediate postpartum intrauterine device expulsion rates: A retrospective cohort study. Society of Family Planning Research Practice Support: Strategies and considerations for addressing race and racism in quantitative family planning studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1