肾移植手术等待时间过长的决定因素。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Transplantation proceedings Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010
{"title":"肾移植手术等待时间过长的决定因素。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparity in waiting time to kidney transplantation led to new policy (KAS250). Our aims were to identify variables associated with long wait time (LWT); assess the impact of KAS250 on WT; and analyze modifiable transplant center behaviors correlated with WT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>SRTR data for adult deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed. Time-periods from 8/1/2018-7/31/2019 and 5/1/2021-4/30/2022 were chosen for pre- and post-KAS250 analyses. Transplant centers were categorized as LWT or SWT centers depending on whether pre-KAS250 median center waiting times were greater or less than the national pre-KAS250 median waiting time of 57.8 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In multivariate analysis, transplantation with HCV NAT negative kidneys was associated with an additional 21.3 months of WT (CI: 18.5-24.2, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and transplantation with KDPI &lt;85% kidneys was associated with an additional 10.8 months (CI: 8.2-13.3, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Post-KAS250 national kidney transplant waiting time decreased from 61-58 months (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and waiting time at LWT centers decreased from 74-69 months (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Cold ischemic times (CIT) increased (20.2 hours vs 18.3 hours, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and DGF rates also increased (32.7% vs 31.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Centers generally displayed more aggressive transplantation practices post-KAS250 however significant differences in DCD utilization, organ offer acceptance ratios and tolerance for long CIT persist between SWT and LWT centers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>KAS250 has reduced waiting time disparities between SWT and LWT centers at the cost of increased CIT and DGF and reduced allocation efficiency. Significant differences in transplant practice persist between SWT and LWT centers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":23246,"journal":{"name":"Transplantation proceedings","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004470/pdfft?md5=f6c3e0df55e713cd1cd2ea08084e0daa&pid=1-s2.0-S0041134524004470-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determinants of Long Waiting Time to Kidney Transplantation\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.08.010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Disparity in waiting time to kidney transplantation led to new policy (KAS250). Our aims were to identify variables associated with long wait time (LWT); assess the impact of KAS250 on WT; and analyze modifiable transplant center behaviors correlated with WT.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>SRTR data for adult deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed. Time-periods from 8/1/2018-7/31/2019 and 5/1/2021-4/30/2022 were chosen for pre- and post-KAS250 analyses. Transplant centers were categorized as LWT or SWT centers depending on whether pre-KAS250 median center waiting times were greater or less than the national pre-KAS250 median waiting time of 57.8 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In multivariate analysis, transplantation with HCV NAT negative kidneys was associated with an additional 21.3 months of WT (CI: 18.5-24.2, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), and transplantation with KDPI &lt;85% kidneys was associated with an additional 10.8 months (CI: 8.2-13.3, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Post-KAS250 national kidney transplant waiting time decreased from 61-58 months (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and waiting time at LWT centers decreased from 74-69 months (<em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Cold ischemic times (CIT) increased (20.2 hours vs 18.3 hours, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001) and DGF rates also increased (32.7% vs 31.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001). Centers generally displayed more aggressive transplantation practices post-KAS250 however significant differences in DCD utilization, organ offer acceptance ratios and tolerance for long CIT persist between SWT and LWT centers.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>KAS250 has reduced waiting time disparities between SWT and LWT centers at the cost of increased CIT and DGF and reduced allocation efficiency. Significant differences in transplant practice persist between SWT and LWT centers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004470/pdfft?md5=f6c3e0df55e713cd1cd2ea08084e0daa&pid=1-s2.0-S0041134524004470-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplantation proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004470\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplantation proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041134524004470","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肾移植等待时间的差异导致了新政策(KAS250)的出台。我们的目的是确定与漫长等待时间(LWT)相关的变量;评估 KAS250 对 WT 的影响;分析与 WT 相关的移植中心可修改的行为:分析了成人死亡供肾移植的 SRTR 数据。选择 2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2019 年 7 月 31 日和 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日这两个时间段进行 KAS250 之前和之后的分析。根据KAS250前中心等待时间中位数是大于还是小于KAS250前全国等待时间中位数57.8个月,移植中心被分为LWT中心和SWT中心:在多变量分析中,HCV NAT阴性肾脏移植与额外21.3个月的WT相关(CI:18.5-24.2,P < .0001),KDPI移植与额外21.3个月的WT相关:KAS250 以增加 CIT 和 DGF 以及降低分配效率为代价,缩小了西南移植中心和西北移植中心之间等待时间的差距。SWT中心和LWT中心在移植实践方面仍存在显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Determinants of Long Waiting Time to Kidney Transplantation

Background

Disparity in waiting time to kidney transplantation led to new policy (KAS250). Our aims were to identify variables associated with long wait time (LWT); assess the impact of KAS250 on WT; and analyze modifiable transplant center behaviors correlated with WT.

Methods

SRTR data for adult deceased donor kidney transplants were analyzed. Time-periods from 8/1/2018-7/31/2019 and 5/1/2021-4/30/2022 were chosen for pre- and post-KAS250 analyses. Transplant centers were categorized as LWT or SWT centers depending on whether pre-KAS250 median center waiting times were greater or less than the national pre-KAS250 median waiting time of 57.8 months.

Results

In multivariate analysis, transplantation with HCV NAT negative kidneys was associated with an additional 21.3 months of WT (CI: 18.5-24.2, P < .0001), and transplantation with KDPI <85% kidneys was associated with an additional 10.8 months (CI: 8.2-13.3, P < .0001). Post-KAS250 national kidney transplant waiting time decreased from 61-58 months (P < .0001) and waiting time at LWT centers decreased from 74-69 months (P < .0001). Cold ischemic times (CIT) increased (20.2 hours vs 18.3 hours, P < .0001) and DGF rates also increased (32.7% vs 31.0%, P < .0001). Centers generally displayed more aggressive transplantation practices post-KAS250 however significant differences in DCD utilization, organ offer acceptance ratios and tolerance for long CIT persist between SWT and LWT centers.

Conclusion

KAS250 has reduced waiting time disparities between SWT and LWT centers at the cost of increased CIT and DGF and reduced allocation efficiency. Significant differences in transplant practice persist between SWT and LWT centers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplantation proceedings
Transplantation proceedings 医学-免疫学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
502
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Transplantation Proceedings publishes several different categories of manuscripts, all of which undergo extensive peer review by recognized authorities in the field prior to their acceptance for publication. The first type of manuscripts consists of sets of papers providing an in-depth expression of the current state of the art in various rapidly developing components of world transplantation biology and medicine. These manuscripts emanate from congresses of the affiliated transplantation societies, from Symposia sponsored by the Societies, as well as special Conferences and Workshops covering related topics. Transplantation Proceedings also publishes several special sections including publication of Clinical Transplantation Proceedings, being rapid original contributions of preclinical and clinical experiences. These manuscripts undergo review by members of the Editorial Board. Original basic or clinical science articles, clinical trials and case studies can be submitted to the journal?s open access companion title Transplantation Reports.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Author Index Advancing Cardiac Care: A Registry of Heart Transplantation in Latin America (1968-2022) Assessing Frailty, Rational Use of Medications, and Adherence to Immunosuppressive Therapy in Liver Transplant Recipients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1